Vertical Soft Tissue Augmentation With CTG vs ADM

Vertical Soft Tissue Augmentation With Dermal Matrix and Enamel Matrix Derivative vs Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized, Controlled, Clinical, Trial

The study aims at comparing two different approaches for vertical soft tissue augmentation at implant sites exhibiting soft tissue dehiscences: autogenous connective tissue graft vs acellular dermal matrix + enamel matrix derivative

The present randomized clinical trial aims at investigating two approaches (autogenous connective tissue graft vs acellular dermal matrix + enamel matrix derivative) when performed for vertical soft tissue augmentation at sites with peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences. Clinical, volumetric, ultrasonographic, and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated at different time points up to 1 year.

Inclusion criteria:

• Age ≥ 18 years
• Periodontally and systemically healthy
• Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score ≤ 20% (measured at four sites per tooth)
• Presence of single functional dental implant in the anterior with a PSTD
• Implants diagnosed as healthy (Berglundh et al., 2018)

Exclusion criteria are:

• Contraindications for surgery
• Systemic condition (e.g. diabetes mellitus, HIV, cancer, etc) that could compromise wound healing
• Patients pregnant or attempting to get pregnant (self-reported)
• Untreated periodontitis
• Untreated peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis (Berglundh et al., 2018)
• Smoking, defined as self-reported daily habit. Occasional smokers won't be excluded
• History of soft tissue grafting at the implant site within the last 6 months