Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health Ltd | OTHER |
| Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation | OTHER |
| London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
DIAGNOSTIC Study
Design:
The study is a multicentre, multidisciplinary, cross sectional, prospective clinically based research project.
The first component is a diagnostic study which will enrol 225 women attending family planning services in each of the three study sites in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Madagascar. Vaginal samples from the women will be applied to the GIFT device and results will be compared with the composite NAAT reference test for STIs and Nugent score test for BV to determine the performance of the device to detect STIs/BV. Women will attend only one study visit but will be recalled for treatment if required.
The second component to develop a feasible, acceptable and economically feasible STI/BV management algorithm which includes the use of the GIFT device to be integrated into national guidelines (hereafter referred to as the "integration study") is composed of four activities with different study designs: 1.User experiences and/or perceptions of the GIFT device involving qualitative focus group discussions and in-depth interviews, and a quantitative questionnaire for health care professionals; 2. Discrete choice experiment; 3 Development of a decision tree classification algorithm; 4. Economic evaluation of the defined management algorithms.
Study Sites:
Diagnostic Device:
The GIFT device is an immune-based lateral flow test for reproductive-aged, non-pregnant in resource-limited settings attending sexual reproductive health (family planning) clinics, community health centers, hospitals, and mobile clinics. The test involves the qualitative detection of genital inflammation caused by asymptomatic STIs and BV in self- or clinician-collected lateral vaginal wall swabs, with results available in less than 20 minutes.
Diagnostic Study Objectives:
Primary objectives To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the GIFT device at the point-of-care in non-pregnant sexually active women aged 18-35 years accessing family planning services in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Madagascar.
Secondary objectives To assess the predictive values of the GIFT device at the point-of-care in non-pregnant sexually active women aged 18-35 years accessing family planning services in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Madagascar; To assess the performance of the GIFT device at the point-of-care in non-pregnant sexually active women aged 18-35 years accessing family planning services in each of the countries; To assess the performance of the device versus syndromic management without any laboratory testing (standard of care in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Madagascar); To determine the robustness of the device by comparing results read by clinicians with those read by laboratory professionals, and with the results obtained using an automated reader; To evaluate the accuracy of the GIFT device by comparing the GIFT device results with ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) results using previously validated concentration cut-offs as the gold standard, including validation of the GIFT cytokine concentration cut-offs for each cytokine biomarker.
Exploratory objectives Determine if other determinants (such as intermediate microbiota (Nugent 4-6), age, parity, sexual activity) improve the prediction of STI/BV status in women; To use 16S rRNA gene sequencing and vaginal bacteria specific quantitative NAATs to evaluate the proportion of cases of genital inflammation explained by vaginal dysbiosis that was not diagnosed as an STI or BV by NAATs or Nugent scoring; To explore the performance of the device in the presence of vaginal Candida spp colonisation.
INTEGRATION Study To evaluate how the GIFT device can be integrated in a feasible, acceptable, and cost-effective way into routine care (the "integration study"), four activities will be conducted: 1. User experiences and/or perceptions of the GIFT device; 2. Discrete choice experiment; 3 Development of a decision tree classification algorithm; 4. Economic evaluation of the defined management algorithms.
Objectives:
Primary objective To evaluate how the GIFT device could be integrated into routine care.
Secondary objectives To qualitatively and quantitatively assess the user-experience, usability, and acceptability of the GIFT device at the point of care; To examine patient preferences for various STI management aspects (attributes) to inform the development of STI management algorithms that integrate the GIFT device; To generate algorithms that integrate the GIFT device to optimise case finding and STIs/vaginal infection management in women, using the complete dataset from the study; To determine the cost and budget impact of the identified screening or diagnostic algorithm with the GIFT device, and to model the cost- effectiveness of different strategies of integration of GIFT into care.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIFT Device | Device | The GIFT device - immune-based lateral flow test for reproductive-aged, non-pregnant in resource-limited settings attending sexual reproductive health (family planning) clinics, community health centers, hospitals, and mobile clinics. The test involves the qualitative detection of genital inflammation caused by asymptomatic STIs and BV in self- or clinician-collected lateral vaginal wall swabs, with results available in less than 20 minutes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Estimates of sensitivity and specificity for the GIFT device | Detecting the presence of any STI or BV with 95% confidence intervals, using NAATs and Nugent scoring in a composite reference standard. | Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023 |
| How the GIFT device could be integrated into routine care | Integration into healthcare guidelines | Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Positive and negative predictive values of the GIFT device | predictive values of the GIFT device in each country and likelihood ratios, using NAATs and Nugent scoring as a composite reference standard | Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023 |
| Overall sensitivity of NAAT and Nugent scoring |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Expository Endpoint: Post-estimation classifications | (% of women correctly classified, fit of the model) from logistic regression models. | Start- quarter 3/2023; End- quarter 4/2024 |
Diagnostic Inclusion Criteria:
Integration Inclusion Criteria:
For all: Willing and able to provide informed consent to participate in the study
User experiences/perceptions activity:
Discrete choice experiments:
Decision tree classification algorithm:
Economic evaluation:
Diagnostic Exclusion Criteria:
Integration Exclusion Criteria:
For all: Not willing or able to provide informed consent to participate in the study
User experiences/perceptions activity:
Women who are:
Discrete choice experiments:
Women who are:
Decision tree classification algorithm:
Economic evaluation:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Diagnostic:
Non-pregnant, sexually active women aged 18-35 years accessing family planning services.
Integration:
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jo-Ann Passmore, Professor | University of Cape Town | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Gynéco-Obstétrique de Befelatanana | Antananarivo | Madagascar | ||||
| Desmond Tutu Health Foundation |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38692732 | Derived | Ramboarina S, Crucitti T, Gill K, Bekker LG, Harding-Esch EM, van de Wijgert JHHM, Huynh BT, Fortas C, Harimanana A, Mayouya Gamana T, Randremanana RV, Mangahasimbola R, Dziva Chikwari C, Kranzer K, Mackworth-Young CRS, Bernays S, Thomas N, Anderson D, Tanko FR, Manhanzva M, Lurie M, Khumalo F, Sinanovic E, Honda A, Pidwell T, Francis SC, Masson L, Passmore JA; GIFT study group. Novel point-of-care cytokine biomarker lateral flow test for the screening for sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis: study protocol of a multicentre multidisciplinary prospective observational clinical study to evaluate the performance and feasibility of the Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT). BMJ Open. 2024 May 1;14(5):e084918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084918. |
Not provided
Not provided
De-identified study data will be made available to the study team only.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| UMC Utrecht |
| OTHER |
| Institut Pasteur | INDUSTRY |
| Institut Pasteur de Madagascar | OTHER |
| Hitotsubashi University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Urine - Pregnancy test Finger prick blood - HIV testing Dacron vaginal swab-SWAB 1 - GIFT device Dacron vaginal swab- SWAB 2 - Cytokine ELISA Dacron vaginal swab- SWAB 3 - pH Dacron vaginal swab-SWAB 3 - Nugent score Copan flocked vaginal swab- SWAB 4 - STI NAAT Copan flocked vaginal swab- SWAB 5 - STI NAAT Copan flocked vaginal swab- SWAB 5 - Quantitative PCR for Lactobacilli, Gardnerella vaginalis and Fannyhessea vaginae; Semen NAAT/ELISA Copan flocked vaginal swab-SWAB 6 and 7 - 16S rRNA sequencing
Specificity and predictive values in each country using NAATs and Nugent scoring |
| Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023 |
| Overall sensitivity | Specificity and predictive values in each country and likelihood ratios of syndromic management, using NAATs and Nugent scoring as composite reference standards | Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023 |
| Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values in each country and likelihood ratios calculated with both methods | GIFT device and syndromic management using NAATs and Nugent scoring as composite reference standards | Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023 |
| Positive and negative agreement proportion and Kappa coefficient between results readings of 1/clinician and technician | 2/clinician and automated reader; 3/technician and automated reader | Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023 |
| Positive and negative agreement proportion and Kappa coefficient between results readings of GIFT device and cytokine ELISA measurements | GIFT device and cytokine ELISA measurements | Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023 |
| User experiences | Perceptions of GIFT device | Start- quarter 1/2023; End- quarter 4/2023 |
| User preferences | different STI management strategies based on patient preferences for various attributes of STI management using GIFT device | Start- quarter 2/2023; End- quarter 1/2024 |
| Optimal case finding and STI management strategies | Using diagnostic study results | Start: - quarter 1/2024; End- quarter 4/2024 |
| Cost and budget impact | Economic evaluation for the budget impact analysis to create strategies of integrating the GIFT device into standard of care | Start- quarter 3/2023; End- quarter 2/2024 |
| Cape Town |
| Western Cape |
| 7975 |
| South Africa |
| Chitungwiza Primary Health Care Clinics | Harare | Zimbabwe |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided