Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Consorci Sanitari del Maresme | OTHER |
| Instituto de Salud Carlos III | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
According WHO, oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is a prevalent post-stroke (PS) condition involving the digestive system (ICD-10: I69.391) and an independent risk factor for malnutrition and pulmonary infection; and leads to greater morbimortality and healthcare costs and poorer quality of life (QoL). Currently, OD therapy is mainly compensatory, with low rates of compliance and small benefit, and there is no pharmacological treatment, so new treatments that improve patients' condition are crucial. PS-OD patients present both oropharyngeal sensory and motor deficits, so neurorehabilitation treatments which target both could be optimum. Benefits of paired peripheral sensory stimulation with oral capsaicin and of central motor noninvasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) will be studied. Pairing pharmacological peripheral and central stimulation may produce greater benefits. The main aim of the project is to study the efficacy of two novel protocols of paired stimulation on PS-OD patients. The investigators will assess whether 5-day application of tDCS/capsaicin or rTMS/capsaicin in the chronic phase of stroke, will improve PS-OD. One RCT (200 patients in the chronic stroke phase divided in 4 study arms) will assess changes in swallow safety, biomechanics and neurophysiology of the swallow response, hospital stay, respiratory and nutritional complications, mortality and QoL.
tDCS: G1: Active treatment consists of swallowing 10mL capsaicin (150μM) and, just after, of applying 30min of 2.0mA tDCS (DC-Stimulator Plus, NeuroConn, Germany) with the anode placed over the pharyngeal primary motor cortex (M1) of the unaffected hemisphere (3.5cm lateral / 1cm anterior to the vertex) and the cathode over the opposite supraorbital region. Treatment applied over 5 consecutive days.
rTMS: G1: each session (5 consecutive days) of active treatment consists of swallowing 10mL capsaicin (150μM) and, just after, of applying focal (alpha D70 coil) rTMS (Magstim Rapid2, UK) over the pharyngeal M1 hotspot of the unaffected hemisphere. Neuronavigation (Brainsight TMS navigation, UK) ensures the exact hotspot over 5 days. A total of 500 pulses/session are delivered consisting of 10 5Hz-trains of 10s of 50 pulses each (total 2500 pulses), with a 1min interval between trains at an intensity of 90% of the resting motor threshold (RMT). G2: Sham rTMS+oral placebo (10mL of potassium sorbate). The same protocol will be applied, but with the coil tilted 90º from the tangent of the skull, as a standard method for sham rTMS application.
Primary outcomes: Pre- vs post-intervention changes in VFS signs of safety and efficacy of swallow, PAS scoring, timing of swallow response and amplitude and latency of pSEPs and pMEPs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active rTMS + capsaicin 150μM | Experimental | Each session (5 consecutive days) of active treatment consists of swallowing 10mL capsaicin (150μM) and, just after, of applying focal (alpha D70 coil) rTMS (Magstim Rapid2, UK) over the pharyngeal M1 hotspot of the unaffected hemisphere. |
|
| sham rTMS + placebo | Other | The same protocol will be applied, swallowing 10mL of placebo (potassium sorbate) but with the coil tilted 90º from the tangent of the skull, as a standard method for sham rTMS application. |
|
| active tDCS + capsaicin 150μM | Experimental | Active treatment consists of swallowing 10mL capsaicin (150μM) and, just after, of applying 30min of 2.0mA tDCS (DC-Stimulator Plus, NeuroConn, Germany) with the anode placed over the pharyngeal primary motor cortex (M1) of the unaffected hemisphere (3.5cm lateral / 1cm anterior to the vertex) and the cathode over the opposite supraorbital region. |
|
| sham tDCS + placebo | Other | The same protocol will be applied, swallowing 10mL of placebo (potassium sorbate) but tDCS current is ramped up over 30s in order to simulate the active tDCS and then turned off for 30min23. Setup characteristics otherwise invariable. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rTMS + capsaicin 150μM (natural TRPV1 agonist) | Device | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (non-invasive brain stimulation) + Capsaicin. 5 consecutive days of active treatment consists of swallowing 10mL capsaicin (150μM) and, just after, of applying focal (alpha D70 coil) rTMS (Magstim Rapid2, UK) over the pharyngeal M1 hotspot of the unaffected hemisphere. A total of 500 pulses/session are delivered consisting of 10 5Hz-trains of 10s of 50 pulses each (total 2500 pulses), with a 1min interval between trains at an intensity of 90% of the resting motor threshold (RMT). The intervention has its respective sham rTMS+placebo group that is also applied over 5 consecutive days. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in the videofluoroscopy (signs of safety and efficacy of swallow) | Pre- vs post-intervention changes in: - Frequency of videofluoroscopic (VFS) signs of safety and efficacy of swallow. | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Changes in the videofluoroscopy (Penetration-Aspiration scale) | Pre- vs post-intervention changes in: - Penetration-Aspiration scale (PAS). The scales goes from 1 (safe swallow) to 8 (silent aspiration). The severity increases as the score increases. | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Timing of oropharyngeal swallow response (total deglutition time) with videofluoroscopy | - Total deglutition time (ms). | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Timing of oropharyngeal swallow response (time to laryngeal vestibule closure) with videofluoroscopy | - Time to laryngeal vestibule closure (ms). | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Timing of oropharyngeal swallow response (time to upper esophageal sphincter opening) with videofluoroscopy | - Time to upper esophageal sphincter opening (ms). | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Timing of oropharyngeal swallow response (bolus velocity) with videofluoroscopy | - Bolus velocity (m·s-1). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in spontaneous swallowing frequency | Pre/post-intervention changes in spontaneous swallowing frequency (swallows/minute) | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Safety of the treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pere Clavé, MD, PhD | Contact | +34937417700 | 1046 | pclave@csdm.cat |
| Omar Ortega, PhD | Contact | +34937417700 | 2284 | oortega@csdm.cat |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pere Clavé, MD, PhD | Consorci Sanitari del Maresme | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital de Mataró. Consorci Sanitari del Mareme. | Recruiting | Mataró | Barcelona | 08304 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27398981 | Result | Cabib C, Ortega O, Kumru H, Palomeras E, Vilardell N, Alvarez-Berdugo D, Muriana D, Rofes L, Terre R, Mearin F, Clave P. Neurorehabilitation strategies for poststroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: from compensation to the recovery of swallowing function. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Sep;1380(1):121-138. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13135. Epub 2016 Jul 11. | |
| 32449296 |
Not provided
Not provided
No IPD will be available to other researchers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003680 | Deglutition Disorders |
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D010608 | Pharyngeal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050781 | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| D065908 | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055909 | Magnetic Field Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D003295 | Convulsive Therapy |
Not provided
Not provided
Single-center, double-blinded, two-arm, double-randomization RCT to assess the effect of paired sensory (capsaicin vs placebo) and motor stimulation (rTMS vs tDCS) for post-stroke patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.
Not provided
Not provided
Double-blinded. Blinding will be applicable for clinical and instrumental assessments for investigators, and for intervention condition for patients.
|
|
| tDCS + capsaicin 150μM (natural TRPV1 agonist) | Device | Transcranial direct current stimulation (non-invasive brain stimulation) + Capsaicin. Treatment consists of swallowing 10mL capsaicin (150μM) and, just after, of applying 30min of 2.0mA tDCS (DC-Stimulator Plus, NeuroConn, Germany) with the anode placed over the pharyngeal primary motor cortex (M1) of the unaffected hemisphere (3.5cm lateral / 1cm anterior to the vertex) and the cathode over the opposite supraorbital region. The intervention has its respective sham tDCS+placebo group that is also applied over 5 consecutive days. |
|
|
| 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Timing of oropharyngeal swallow response (Kinetic energy) with videofluoroscopy | - Kinetic energy of the bolus (mJ). | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Changes in neurophysiology of swallow (sensory pathway) latency | - Latency of pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials to intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation. | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Changes in neurophysiology of swallow (sensory pathway) amplitude | - Amplitude of pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials to intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation. | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Changes in neurophysiology of swallow (motor pathway) latency | - Latency of pharyngeal motor evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation. | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
| Changes in neurophysiology of swallow (motor pathway) amplitude | - Amplitude of pharyngeal motor evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation. | 5 days (changes between basal visit, time 0, and post-treatment visit, time + 5 days) |
Safety of the treatment applied (adverse events rate) during all the study period.
| Baseline (basal visit) to 3 months follow-up |
| Length of stay | Length of hospital stay. | Baseline (basal visit) to 3 months follow-up |
| Aspiration pneumonia admission | Admissions due to aspiration pneumonia during the study and at 3-month follow-up. | Baseline (basal visit) to 3 months follow-up |
| Nutritional status | Nutritional status (MNA-sf) at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. | Baseline (basal visit) to 3 months follow-up |
| Functional status | Functional status (Barthel index) at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. | Baseline (basal visit) to 3 months follow-up |
| Functional status associated to stroke | Rankin scale at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. | Baseline (basal visit) to 3 months follow-up |
| General hospital readmissions for any cause | Hospital readmissions during the study (from baseline (basal visit) to 3 months follow-up). | Baseline (basal visit) to 3 months follow-up |
| Mortality | Mortality over the study period (from baseline (basal visit) to 3 months follow-up). | Baseline (basal visit) to 3 months follow-up |
| Swallowing clinical evaluation | Volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST) parameters comparison between post-treatment visit (+5 days) and 3 months follow-up visit. | Immediately after the intervention to 3 months follow-up visit |
| Cabib C, Nascimento W, Rofes L, Arreola V, Tomsen N, Mundet L, Palomeras E, Michou E, Clave P, Ortega O. Short-term neurophysiological effects of sensory pathway neurorehabilitation strategies on chronic poststroke oropharyngeal dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Sep;32(9):e13887. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13887. Epub 2020 May 24. |
| 30941716 | Result | Cabib C, Nascimento W, Rofes L, Arreola V, Tomsen N, Mundet L, Muriana D, Palomeras E, Michou E, Clave P, Ortega O. Neurophysiological and Biomechanical Evaluation of the Mechanisms Which Impair Safety of Swallow in Chronic Post-stroke Patients. Transl Stroke Res. 2020 Feb;11(1):16-28. doi: 10.1007/s12975-019-00701-2. Epub 2019 Apr 2. |
| 28872738 | Result | Cabib C, Ortega O, Vilardell N, Mundet L, Clave P, Rofes L. Chronic post-stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia is associated with impaired cortical activation to pharyngeal sensory inputs. Eur J Neurol. 2017 Nov;24(11):1355-1362. doi: 10.1111/ene.13392. Epub 2017 Sep 5. |
| 33799960 | Result | Nascimento W, Tomsen N, Acedo S, Campos-Alcantara C, Cabib C, Alvarez-Larruy M, Clave P. Effect of Aging, Gender and Sensory Stimulation of TRPV1 Receptors with Capsaicin on Spontaneous Swallowing Frequency in Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 7;11(3):461. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030461. |
| 30956054 | Result | Wang Z, Wu L, Fang Q, Shen M, Zhang L, Liu X. Effects of capsaicin on swallowing function in stroke patients with dysphagia: A randomized controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Jun;28(6):1744-1751. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Apr 5. |
| 36142680 | Result | Tomsen N, Ortega O, Alvarez-Berdugo D, Rofes L, Clave P. A Comparative Study on the Effect of Acute Pharyngeal Stimulation with TRP Agonists on the Biomechanics and Neurophysiology of Swallow Response in Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 15;23(18):10773. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810773. |
| 31068978 | Result | Tomsen N, Ortega O, Rofes L, Arreola V, Martin A, Mundet L, Clave P. Acute and subacute effects of oropharyngeal sensory stimulation with TRPV1 agonists in older patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a biomechanical and neurophysiological randomized pilot study. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr 30;12:1756284819842043. doi: 10.1177/1756284819842043. eCollection 2019. |
| 9291902 | Result | Hamdy S, Aziz Q, Rothwell JC, Crone R, Hughes D, Tallis RC, Thompson DG. Explaining oropharyngeal dysphagia after unilateral hemispheric stroke. Lancet. 1997 Sep 6;350(9079):686-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02068-0. |
| 21441148 | Result | Kumar S, Wagner CW, Frayne C, Zhu L, Selim M, Feng W, Schlaug G. Noninvasive brain stimulation may improve stroke-related dysphagia: a pilot study. Stroke. 2011 Apr;42(4):1035-40. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.602128. Epub 2011 Mar 24. |
| 23279198 | Result | Park JW, Oh JC, Lee JW, Yeo JS, Ryu KH. The effect of 5Hz high-frequency rTMS over contralesional pharyngeal motor cortex in post-stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: a randomized controlled study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Apr;25(4):324-e250. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12063. Epub 2012 Dec 23. |
| 12849236 | Result | Kobayashi M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol. 2003 Mar;2(3):145-56. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00321-1. |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D013000 |
| Psychiatric Somatic Therapies |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D004597 | Electroshock |
| D011580 | Psychological Techniques |