Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to test whether an adaptive radiation therapy (RT), two-phase approach in participants with glioblastoma impacts local control compared to standard non-adaptive RT approach. The main questions of the study are to see how this adaptive, two-phase RT approach compares to standard RT in terms of:
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a high grade glioma (brain tumor) that is treated with surgery or biopsy followed by radiotherapy (RT) given daily over 6 weeks with or without an oral chemotherapy. Radiation is targeted to the visible residual tumor on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images plus a large margin of 15 to 30 mm to account for possible cancer cells outside the visible tumor and for potential growth or shifts in tumor position throughout the prolonged RT course. Standard RT uses MRI to create a reference plan (with large margins) and treats that same volume every day. This exposes a large amount of healthy brain tissue to radiation leading to toxicity and reduced quality of life.
A new technology, the MR-Linac, combines an MRI scanner and a Linac (radiation delivery machine) into one unit. This allows for "adaptive" RT by obtaining an updated MRI scan each day just prior to treatment, adapting the RT plan to take into account any changes in the tumor or the patient's anatomy on that given day. This allows for a smaller (5 mm) margin on the visible tumor as its position can be tracked daily. The goal of this study is to use adaptive RT with small margins with a two-phase approach to test the impact on local control of the visible tumor compared to the large volumes used with standard non-adaptive RT, as well as impacts on neurocognitive function and quality of life.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive, two-phase RT | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive, two-phase RT | Radiation | Participants in this arm will be treated with an adaptive, two-phase radiation therapy approach |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of marginal failure (if 20-80% of the recurrent GTV (rGTV) falls within the 95% isodose line) | Through study completion, anticipated 6-12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival | Through study completion, anticipated 6-24 months | |
| Progression-free survival | Through study completion, anticipated ~5 months | |
| Rate of local control, in accordance with RANO-HGG criteria |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Histopathologically confirmed, based on biopsy or surgical resection, glioblastoma, or grade 4 astrocytoma, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO)
Deemed clinically appropriate for long course radiation therapy concurrent with systemic therapy
Biopsy or surgical resection performed ≤ 12 weeks prior to study entry
Adequate hematological, renal and hepatic functions as defined by the following required laboratory values obtained within 14 days prior to study entry:
Expected survival ≥ 12 weeks
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
Able (sufficiently fluent in English) and willing to complete quality of life questionnaires; however, inability to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study
Sufficient estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥ 30 mL / min/1.73 m2 to allow administration of gadolinium-based contrast agent; patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 not on dialysis may be allowed on the study after discussion of risks and benefits and approval by study neuroradiologist(s)
Completed written informed consent
Patient must be accessible for treatment and follow-up
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre | Toronto | Ontario | M4N3M5 | Canada |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005909 | Glioblastoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001254 | Astrocytoma |
| D005910 | Glioma |
| D018302 | Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial |
| D017599 | Neuroectodermal Tumors |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Through study completion, anticipated ~5 months |
| Patterns of failure | Through study completion, anticipated 6-24 months |
| Rate of toxicity | Assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute toxicity scale, which assesses acute toxicity using a scale of 0-5, and late toxicity using a scale of 1-4. In both scales, a higher score means a worse outcome. | Through study completion, anticipated 6-24 months |
| Health-related Quality of Life | Assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 to measure quality of life | Through study completion, anticipated 6-24 months |
| Changes in neurologic function | Assessed through the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale | Through study completion, anticipated 6-24 months |
| Adaptive Radiation Dosimetry | 6 weeks |
| Functional Imaging Kinetics as a Correlate of Treatment Response | Through study completion, anticipated 12-24 months |
| D009373 |
| Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009380 | Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue |