Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is being conducted to learn more about a procedure, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube, in treating patients with eustachian tube dysfunction. Traditionally, eustachian tube dysfunction is treated with nasal steroid sprays and decongestants, or by placement of ear tubes. However, current evidence suggest that medical options are ineffective, and placement of ear tubes is not risk-free. The investigators are carrying out this research study with the following goals:
What does participation in this study involve? Participants in this study will:
Agree to be randomly assigned to undergo either: balloon dilation of the eustachian tube, or a placebo procedure, with the option to undergo dilation of the eustachian tube 6 weeks later
Agree to allowing the investigators access to their personal health information
Complete the following assessments and questionnaires in clinic before undergoing balloon dilation or placebo procedure:
Repeat the above assessments and questionnaires over the course of four follow-up appointments at 6-, 24-, and 52-weeks after the procedure.
Adult eustachian tube dilatory dysfunction (ETDD) accounts for over 2 million healthcare visits annually. It can cause longstanding negative middle ear pressure which may lead to otitis media with effusion, tympanic membrane retraction, perforation, middle ear atelectasis and cholesteatoma. Despite this, effective treatments for ETDD are unavailable. Recently, balloon dilation of the eustachian tube (BDET) has gained popularity, where the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube undergoes local dilation with balloon inflation. This technique underwent industry-funded clinical trials in the United States demonstrating its safety and it's superiority to medical management. However, these studies are confounded by industry funding and lack of a blinded control group, the latter of which is critical in a condition where patient-reported outcome measures are relied on. Furthermore, the randomized studies to date do not include patients with baro-challenge ETDD, where symptoms are limited to the context of ambient pressure changes. As such, the investigators opted to perform a non-industry-funded, placebo-controlled trial including both chronic and baro-challenge ETDD patients in a Canadian setting.
Potential participants will be identified as possible study candidates with either chronic ETDD or baro-challenge ETDD, who have failed conservative management. At baseline, participants would undergo pure tone audiometry, tympanometry, and otoscopy. An ETDQ7, ad hoc work/activity impairment questionnaire, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire would be completed. The patient's ability to equalize their middle ear pressure would be assessed by direct visualization of the tympanic membrane as the patient equalizes their middle ear pressure. For patients with baro-challenge ETDD, a baseline ad hoc questionnaire to quantify their symptoms will be completed as well.
Patients would then be randomized into BDET versus placebo groups. Patients in the experimental group undergoing BDET in-office will undergo dilation after anxiolytic pre-medication, nasal decongestion, as well as topical anesthesia of the lateral tympanic membrane, the eustachian tube orifice, and the nasal cavity. Patients randomized to the placebo group would undergo a similar procedure in-office, but without dilation of the eustachian tube. Patients in the experimental group with contraindication to in-office BDET will undergo BDET under general anesthetic in an operating room setting. The participants' first follow-up visit with the surgeon is at 6 weeks post-procedure, where patients in the placebo control group would be offered the option to cross-over into the BDET group. Follow up would also be repeated at 24 weeks and 52 weeks post-procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balloon dilation of eustachian tube | Experimental | These patient will undergo balloon dilation dilation of the eustachian tube. |
|
| Sham procedure | Sham Comparator | These patients will undergo a sham procedure, where the motions of balloon dilation of the eustachian tube will be simulated. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balloon dilation of eustachian tube | Device | Patients in the intervention group would undergo balloon dilation of the eustachian tube under local anesthetic in clinic. The Stryker XprESS LoProfile ENT dilation system or the Stryker Audion ET dilation system will be used. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in mean Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ7) score | Score range 1-7, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms | 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention |
| Change in symptoms (ad hoc baro-challenge ETDD symptom questionnaire) | Composite of quantitative and qualitative data points | 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in tympanogram type and pressure at peak compliance | Change from type C to A or type B to C or type B to A is considered improvement, and vice versa is considered deterioration. Pressure at peak compliance (continuous variable, where a value of zero is normal, and more negative values indicate worse ET function). | 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria (Chronic ETDD):
Inclusion criteria (baro-challenge ETDD):
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaimi Workun | Contact | 403-764-4755 | 4 | jaimi.workun@albertahealthservices.ca |
| Mohammad Aleinati, MD | Contact | 587-573-4364 | maleinat@ucalgary.ca |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Justin Lui, MD, FRCSC | University of Calgary | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otology Clinic, Clinic 7A, South Health Campus | Recruiting | Calgary | Alberta | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42310698 | Derived | Aleinati M, Spiegel JL, Le TN, Lui JT. In-office balloon dilation for baro-challenge-induced Eustachian tube dysfunction: study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled trial. Trials. 2026 Jun 17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09853-7. Online ahead of print. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Parallel design with optional crossover from control to intervention at 6 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Sham procedure | Other | Patients in the sham group will undergo the motions of an in-office dilation of the eustachian tube, without actually dilating the eustachian tube. |
|
| Change in audiogram (pure tone average thresholds) | Pure tone average thresholds measured at 500hz, 1khz, 2khz, and 4khz, where values below 25dB are normal, and higher values indicate worse hearing. Air-bone gap at 500hz, 1khz, 2khz, 4khz where normal value is 0dB, and higher values indicate worse conductive hearing. | 24 weeks |
| Improvement in ability to equalize middle ear pressure | Qualitative measure where inability to equalize middle ear pressures is a negative outcome. | 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention |
| Tympanic membrane position on otoscopy | Qualitative measure where the tympanic membrane will be in a normal position, or in an abnormal retracted position. | 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention |
| Ad hoc work/activity impairment questionnaire score | Score range 1-7, with higher score indicating more severe symptoms | 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks post-intervention |
| Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center | Recruiting | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
|