Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
At present, endoscopic therapy is the preferred method to solve biliary or pancreatic diseases. And EUS-guided stent implantation and drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst is the main method in Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst. However, blockage of stent is a problem that has puzzled endoscopists for a long time. The mechanism of stent blockage is related to the reflux of gastrointestinal contents into the stent. Although plastic stents are widely used in patients who needed drainage. However, the average free time for stent is only 77 to 126 days, leading to the need for stent replacement in most patients within 3 months. As one end of the double pigtail stent used for drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst may be located in the stomach, it may cause the stent to be blocked by the contents of the stomach. Therefore, multiple stents or additional stents or drainage tube are often needed to further strengthen the drainage.
It seems that the mechanism of stent blockage are associated with gastrointestinal contents reflux. And stents required be replaced again by endoscopic approach when jamming. However, EUS and ERCP are difficult, costly, and may be with complications. Additional operations will increase the risks and costs. Therefore, a stent that can effectively prevent reflux, solve clinical problems, and effectively prolong stent patency time is urgently needed.
At present, endoscopic therapy is the preferred method to solve biliary or pancreatic diseases. And EUS-guided stent implantation and drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst is the main method in Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst. However, blockage of stent is a problem that has puzzled endoscopists for a long time. The mechanism of stent blockage is related to the reflux of gastrointestinal contents into the stent. Although plastic stents are widely used in patients who needed drainage. However, the average free time for stent is only 77 to 126 days, leading to the need for stent replacement in most patients within 3 months. As one end of the double pigtail stent used for drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst may be located in the stomach, it may cause the stent to be blocked by the contents of the stomach. Therefore, multiple stents or additional stents or drainage tube are often needed to further strengthen the drainage.
It seems that the mechanism of stent blockage are associated with gastrointestinal contents reflux. And stents required be replaced again by endoscopic approach when jamming. However, EUS and ERCP are difficult, costly, and may be with complications. Additional operations will increase the risks and costs. Therefore, a stent that can effectively prevent reflux, solve clinical problems, and effectively prolong stent patency time is urgently needed.
The extended enteral anti-reflux stent developed by our research team has potential advantages in prolonging the patency period of the stent and preventing secondary infection of pseudocysts. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effect of the stent on the drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enteral-extended Anti-reflux Stents Group | Experimental | Patients are going to implant enteral-extended anti-reflux stents |
|
| Traditional Stents Group | Active Comparator | Patients are going to implant traditional stents |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant enteral-extended anti-reflux stents | Combination Product | Plant enteral-extended anti-reflux stents in EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disappearance rate of pseudocyst(PDR) after stent implantation | PDR=1-(Postoperative pseudocyst area/Preoperative pseudocyst area)×100% | in 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time of disappearance of pseudocyst after stent implantation | Time of disappearance of pseudocyst after stent implantation | in 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yonghui Huang, archiater | Contact | 13911765322 | chengzhuopku@163.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yonghui Huang, archiater | Peking University Third Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peking University Third Hospital | Recruiting | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100101 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16533479 | Background | Reddy DN, Banerjee R, Choung OW. Antireflux biliary stents: are they the solution to stent occlusions? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006 Apr;8(2):156-60. doi: 10.1007/s11894-006-0012-x. | |
| 9852446 | Background | Pedersen FM, Lassen AT, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. Randomized trial of stent placed above and across the sphincter of Oddi in malignant bile duct obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Dec;48(6):574-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70038-0. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010192 | Pancreatic Pseudocyst |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010181 | Pancreatic Cyst |
| D003560 | Cysts |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Plant traditional stents | Combination Product | Plant traditional stents in EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts |
|
| 9865556 | Background | van Berkel AM, Boland C, Redekop WK, Bergman JJ, Groen AK, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. A prospective randomized trial of Teflon versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy. 1998 Oct;30(8):681-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001388. |
| 25268308 | Background | Walter D, Will U, Sanchez-Yague A, Brenke D, Hampe J, Wollny H, Lopez-Jamar JM, Jechart G, Vilmann P, Gornals JB, Ullrich S, Fahndrich M, de Tejada AH, Junquera F, Gonzalez-Huix F, Siersema PD, Vleggaar FP. A novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a prospective cohort study. Endoscopy. 2015 Jan;47(1):63-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1378113. Epub 2014 Sep 30. |
| 29233670 | Background | Aburajab M, Smith Z, Khan A, Dua K. Safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents with and without simultaneous double-pigtail plastic stents for draining pancreatic pseudocyst. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1248-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.033. Epub 2017 Dec 9. |
| 29474970 | Background | Brimhall B, Han S, Tatman PD, Clark TJ, Wani S, Brauer B, Edmundowicz S, Wagh MS, Attwell A, Hammad H, Shah RJ. Increased Incidence of Pseudoaneurysm Bleeding With Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Compared to Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents in Patients With Peripancreatic Fluid Collections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep;16(9):1521-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Feb 21. |
| D004066 |
| Digestive System Diseases |