Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Marmara University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To compare the efficacies of two different interventional techniques (Caudal epidural steroid injection and S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection) for the treatment of unilateral S1 radiculopathy.
Epidural steroid injections are commonly performed for the treatment of radicular pain resulting from a disc herniation. There are 3 different methods to deliver steroids to epidural area which are caudal, interlaminar and transforaminal routes. Lower lumbar and sacral radiculopathies can be managed with caudal epidural steroid injection which is generally quite easier to perform in comparison to transforaminal injection. Transforaminal epidural injection provides injectate to reach anterior epidural area and is the most target specific technique among others. In the present study investigators aim is to compare the success rates of these two different procedures regarding unilateral S1 radiculopathy. The patients referring to the pain medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital for unilateral radicular pain and diagnosed S1 radiculopathy were planned to be randomized into these two different intervention groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 transforaminal | Active Comparator | The group receiving S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection |
|
| Caudal | Active Comparator | The group receiving caudal epidural steroid injection |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transforaminal epidural steroid injection | Procedure | Fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal epidural injection for radicular pain resulting from a disc herniation. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 50 percent pain relief | Number of patients having at least 50 percent pain relief | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oswestry Disability Index | Improvement in disability scores, 0 is the best, 100 is the worst score. | 3 months |
| Procedure time | The overall ease of application regarding procedure time. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekim Can Ozturk, M.D. | Contact | +905448294239 | ekimtrilogy@gmail.com | |
| Savas Sencan, Assoc. Prof. | Contact | +905370665713 | savas-44@hotmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Osman Hakan Gunduz, Prof. | Marmara University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marmara University School of Medicine | Recruiting | Istanbul | Pendik | 34899 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Patient data, statistics and study protocol can be shared.
1 week
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007405 | Intervertebral Disc Displacement |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D006547 | Hernia |
Not provided
Not provided
Patients having radicular pain were randomized to either caudal or transforaminal epidural injection group
Not provided
Not provided
Patients and the investigator assessing the treatment results were blinded to the injection technique.
| Caudal epidural steroid injection | Procedure | Fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural injection for radicular pain resulting from a disc herniation. |
|
| during procedure |
| Radiation exposure | The exposed radiation dose during the procedures | during procedure |
| D020763 |
| Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |