Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Portsmouth | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A third of older people take five or more regular medications (polypharmacy) potentially increasing the risk of side-effects, hospital admission and death, with higher risk among people living with frailty. National recommendations suggest that medications taken by frail older people should be reviewed annually by GPs to identify and reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (deprescribing). Yet this does not happen routinely due to GPs' lack of time, increased workloads and worries about stopping medicines. Recent recommendations suggest involving other non-medical prescribers such as practice-pharmacists and advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) in reviewing medications. However, it is unknown how staff could work together most effectively and whether they have any training needs.
This research will investigate how practice-pharmacists, ANPs and GPs could best work together with patients living with frailty to perform regular medication reviews. There are four work packages (WPs).
Background A third of older people take five or more regular medications (polypharmacy) potentially increasing the risk of side-effects, hospital admission and death. These effects are higher among people living with frailty who lose their in-built reserves and become vulnerable to changes triggered by small events such as a change in medication. National recommendations suggest that medications taken by frail older people should be reviewed annually by their GPs to identify and reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (deprescribing). Yet this does not happen routinely due to GPs' lack of time, increased workloads and worries about stopping medicines.
Recent recommendations suggest involving other non-medical prescribers such as practice-pharmacists and advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) in reviewing medications. However, it is unknown how staff could work together most effectively and whether they have any training needs.
Aim This research will investigate how practice-pharmacists, ANPs and GPs could best work together with patients living with frailty to perform regular medication review.
Methods The study involves four work packages (WPs). The research team will review previous literature to identify what makes a successful medication review and how to safely reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (WP1).
Interviews with GPs, practice-pharmacists, ANPs, frail older patients and carers will be conducted (WP2). These will discover views about where medication review should take place, the role of each of the involved parties in the process, type of medications that could be deprescribed, staff development and training needs, barriers and facilitators for implementation, and strategies to address these barriers.
Information gathered from WP1&2 will be used to develop the intervention: a structured medication review process using pharmacists, ANPs and GPs most effectively and involving frail patients and their families in decisions about medications (WP3). The intervention will be refined further through a series of workshops with service users, clinicians and commissioners. A training programme to implement the intervention and increase staff confidence in reducing/ stopping medications safely will be developed and delivered to GPs, practice-pharmacists and ANPs based on the Polypharmacy Action Learning Sets approach adopted by the Wessex Academic Health Science Network (AHSN) .
Finally, the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention to staff and patients in four GP practices will be assessed (WP4).
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Three PPI members have been involved in protocol development and refinement and will continue to contribute to the research study by for example being involved in developing research instruments and monitoring recruitment.
Dissemination and impact Working with colleagues in the Wessex AHSN and local clinical commissioners, the research team will be able to share our findings and training programme to the wider research and clinical community in Wessex and potentially influence practices and policies both locally and nationally.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients participating in structured multidisciplinary medication review | Experimental | Patients participating in structured multidisciplinary medication review |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structured multidisciplinary medication review | Other | Multidisciplinary process for medication review/deprescribing: The intervention will be a structured process for performing a shared-decision, person-centred medication review among those living with frailty involving GPs, PCN-pharmacist and ANPs. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of recruitment | proportion of staff recruited and trained in each GP practice | Baseline |
| Number of medications | Total number of medications taken by each patient | change in scores between baseline and 3 months follow up |
| Rates of adverse events | rates of adverse drug events due to deprescribing (including self-reported dizziness, falls, drowsiness, confusion, hallucinations, blurred vision, constipation, diarrhoea, dry mouth or other) during 3 months follow up. | at 3 months |
| Rates of hospitalisation | rates of hospitalisation 3 months post intervention | 3 months |
| Mortality rates | mortality rates 3 months post intervention | 3 months |
| frailty status | Frailty score using the electronic frailty index (e-FI) | changes between baseline and 3 months |
| rates of falls | number of falls reported and proportion of fallers (self-reported) | changes between baseline and 3 months |
| Rates of fractures | number of fractures and proportion of people sustained fractures (self-reported) |
Not provided
Not provided
Eligibility criteria for WP2
Patients:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Informal carers/ relatives eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
Health care professional eligibility criteria
• A health care professional based in GP surgeries in Wessex (eg. GPs, practice-pharmacists, advanced nurse prescriber (ANPs) who works with older people living with frailty, who are prescribed multiple medications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eloise Radcliffe, PhD | Contact | (023) 8120 4656 | e.radcliffe@soton.ac.uk | |
| Kinda Ibrahim, PhD | Contact | (023) 8120 4656 | k.ibrahim@soton.ac.uk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kinda Ibrahim, PhD | University of Southampton | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Research Network in Primary Care | Recruiting | Southampton | United Kingdom |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| The development and iMplementation Of a multidisciplinary medication review and Deprescribing Intervention among Frail older people in primarY care | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multidisciplinary process for medication review/deprescribing: The intervention will be a structured process for performing a shared-decision, person-centred medication review among those living with frailty involving GPs, PCN-pharmacist and ANPs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| changes between baseline and 3 months |
| function | Activity of daily living using Barthel | changes between baseline and 3 months |
| cognition | - cognition using the abbreviated mental test (AMT) | changes between baseline and 3 months |
| depression | - depression using the geriatric depression scale (GDS) | changes between baseline and 3 months |
| healthcare utilisation | number of visits to GP/specialists and number of unplanned hospitalisations | at 3 months follow up |
| Acceptability | Interviews or focus groups will be conducted at the end of the feasibility study with a purposive sample of (n=6-8) GPs, pharmacists, ANPs in the four GP practices who received the training and implemented the intervention, and 8-10 patients and carers who received the intervention | at 3 months follow up |
| Feasibility of deprescribing | number of recommendations in the medication reviews made to each patient (stop, reduce, switch or start). | 3 months follow up |
| number of potentially inappropriate medications | total number of potentially inappropriate medications months using the STOPP/START criteria. | Change between baseline and 3 months follow up |