Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to compare the microbiologic diagnostic yield of pre-aspiration agitated pleural fluid versus that of conventionally aspirated fluid in pleural infection patients. The main question it aims to answer is, whether fluid agitation helps to increase the microbiological yield.
In pleural infection, It is suggested that the bacteria being diagnostically targeted, might more likely be residing on the pleural surface with a better blood supply and nutrition rather than being planktonic in the acidic, glucose deficient pleural fluid. The investigators thus hypothesize that an agitation of the pleural fluid prior to sample aspiration would aid in achieving a better cellular representation of the pleural space. This could have the effect of washing bacterial cells off the pleural surface as well as moving sedimented cells in the aspirated sample. This study aims to investigate whether an increase in the microbiological yield for infected pleural fluid could be achieved by a pre-aspiration agitation of the pleural fluid which would have a positive effect on management and eventual patient outcomes. Adult participants with pleural infection will undergo thoracentesis via both the standard and agitated fluid techniques guided by thoracic ultrasound. Microbiological yields will be compared.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard thoracentesis followed by pre-aspiration fluid agitation | Experimental | Participants will undergo the standard thoracentesis followed by the experimental pre-aspiration fluid agitation technique |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agitated Pleural Fluid Thoracentesis | Procedure | Using a 16-18 gauge cannula, a standard thoracentesis will be performed then a sample of pleural fluid will be aspirated and rapidly flushed into the pleural space and redrawn again for a few cycles before a sample is finally drawn into the collection syringe |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic yield of the microbiologic analysis | Percentage of samples with a positive microbiologic result among both aspiration techniques | results within 1 week of sampling |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| LDH level difference between both aspiration methods | Difference in LDH levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques | results within 1 day of sampling |
| Glucose level difference between both aspiration methods |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chest Diseases Department, Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine | Alexandria | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40251602 | Derived | Sadaka A, Said R, Ashmawy H, Okasha H, Gharraf H. Pleural fluid agitation for improving the microbiologic diagnostic yield in pleural infection: a feasibility study. Respir Res. 2025 Apr 18;26(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03208-7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All participants will undergo both thoracentesis techniques; the standard and the experimental pre-aspiration agitated fluid techniques
Not provided
Not provided
Laboratory personnel responsible for the microbiological and biochemical analysis will be blinded to the identity of the paired samples.
Not provided
|
Difference in glucose levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
| results within 1 day of sampling |
| Protein level difference between both aspiration methods | Difference in protein levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques | results within 1 day of sampling |
| Neutrophilic count difference between both aspiration methods | Difference in neutrophilic count in the aspirated fluid via both techniques | results within 1 day of sampling |
| Lymphocytic count difference between both aspiration methods | Difference in lymphocytic count in the aspirated fluid via both techniques | results within 1 day of sampling |