Intravenous Tenecteplase Plus Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Endovascular Thrombectomy Alone on 4.5 to 24 Hours After Stroke Due to Basilar Artery Occlusion -a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial
Intravenous Tenecteplase Plus Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Endovascular Thrombectomy Alone on 4.5 to 24 Hours After Stroke Due to Basilar Artery Occlusion -a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial
To assess the effect of intravenous tenecteplase plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) compared to EVT alone on 4.5 to 24 hours after stroke due to basilar artery occlusion.
Background and Rationale: Recently, two prospective multicenter RCT (ATTENTION and BAOCHE trials) have shown a significantly beneficial effect of EVT in patients with an acute symptomatic basilar artery occlusion. The EXTEND-IA TNK trial demonstrated that intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase is superior to alteplase before EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion strokes. However, it is unclear whether intravenous tenecteplase bridging with EVT is superior to EVT alone in the extended window patients with basilar artery occlusion. Therefore, additional studies are needed to explore the potential benefit of intravenous tenecteplase in these patients.
Study design: Multicenter, prospective, controlled clinical trial with open-label treatment and blind outcome assessment (PROBE) of intravenous tenecteplase plus EVT versus EVT alone. The trial has observer blinded assessment of the primary outcome and neuroimaging at baseline and follow up.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: