Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University Ghent | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the rehabilitation by use of a smartphone-app with the usual care of physical therapy in patients, 60 years and older, who underwent a primary shoulder arthroplasty.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| APP-GROUP | Experimental | Patients allocated in the app-group will use the app to rehabilitate. |
|
| PHYSIO-GROUP | Active Comparator | Patients allocated in the physio-group will rehabilitate according to the usual care protocol |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APP | Device | Patients allocated in the app-group will use the newly developed smartphone app te rehabilitate. 5 exercises are provided daily. Daily questionnaires will monitor exercise performance, VAS pain, household activities. Information modules will be sent at specific times. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| SHOULDER PAIN AND DISABILITY INDEX (SPADI)_baseline pre-operative | Content: 5 questions for the subscale pain and 8 questions for the disability subscale. Scoring: numeric rating scale from 1 to 10, with a maximum of 130. The total score is the sum of the sub-scores. Interpretation: The higher the score the more pain and disability. The lower the score, the better patients perceive their shoulder | Prior to surgery |
| SHOULDER PAIN AND DISABILITY INDEX (SPADI)_baseline post-operative | Content: 5 questions for the subscale pain and 8 questions for the disability subscale. Scoring: numeric rating scale from 1 to 10, with a maximum of 130. The total score is the sum of the sub-scores. Interpretation: The higher the score the more pain and disability. The lower the score, the better patients perceive their shoulder | week 0 |
| SHOULDER PAIN AND DISABILITY INDEX (SPADI) | Content: 5 questions for the subscale pain and 8 questions for the disability subscale. Scoring: numeric rating scale from 1 to 10, with a maximum of 130. The total score is the sum of the sub-scores. Interpretation: The higher the score the more pain and disability. The lower the score, the better patients perceive their shoulder | week 3 |
| SHOULDER PAIN AND DISABILITY INDEX (SPADI) | Content: 5 questions for the subscale pain and 8 questions for the disability subscale. Scoring: numeric rating scale from 1 to 10, with a maximum of 130. The total score is the sum of the sub-scores. Interpretation: The higher the score the more pain and disability. The lower the score, the better patients perceive their shoulder | week 6 |
| SHOULDER PAIN AND DISABILITY INDEX (SPADI) | Content: 5 questions for the subscale pain and 8 questions for the disability subscale. Scoring: numeric rating scale from 1 to 10, with a maximum of 130. The total score is the sum of the sub-scores. Interpretation: The higher the score the more pain and disability. The lower the score, the better patients perceive their shoulder |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ACTIVE MOBILITY (ROM) OF THE SHOULDER | ACTIVE ROM: forward flexion and abduction with extended elbow, functional internal and external rotation in standing position.
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| M-HEALTH APP USABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE (MAUQ) | Content: 21 questions in 3 categories: ease of use and satisfaction, system information arrangement, usefulness (version for interactive app, user patient and provider). Scoring: between 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree) => average score. Interpretation: the higher the score the higher the usability. | Week 12 |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominiek Vandenbosch, MSc | Contact | +32 9 332 16 69 | dominiek.vandenbosch@ugent.be |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Van Tongel, PhD | University Ghent, University Hospital Ghent | Principal Investigator |
| Ann Cools, PhD | University Ghent | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ghent University Hospital | Recruiting | Ghent | 9000 | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| PHYSICAL THERAPY | Other | Patients allocated in the physio-group will go, twice a week, to a physical therapist of their choice to rehabilitate. The physical therapist will follow the general guidelines provided by the hospital (surgeon). |
|
|
| week 12 |
| SHOULDER PAIN AND DISABILITY INDEX (SPADI) | Content: 5 questions for the subscale pain and 8 questions for the disability subscale. Scoring: numeric rating scale from 1 to 10, with a maximum of 130. The total score is the sum of the sub-scores. Interpretation: The higher the score the more pain and disability. The lower the score, the better patients perceive their shoulder | week 52 |
| Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| PASSIVE MOBILITY (ROM) OF THE SHOULDER | PASSIVE: forward flexion, abduction, external and internal rotation in supine position.
| Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| STRENGTH | Forward flexion, extension, ab- and adduction, external and internal rotation.
| Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| CONSTANT-MURLEY SCORE | Content: partially clinical (65 points) and partially PROM (35 points) assessed. Scoring: The formula to calculate the total score is:" pain (0-15) + ADL (4x (0-5) = 0-20) + mobility (4 x (0-10) = 0-40) + strength (0 -25)". Strength will be measured with the arm elevated to 90 ° in the scapular plane using an IDOmeter. Interpretation: 0-55 points = bad, 56-70 points = mediocre, 71-85 points = good, 86-100 points = excellent score | Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ROTATIONS (ADLEIR) | Content: 12 questions about specific ADL tasks that require external or internal rotation while performing. Scoring: Each activity is scored between 0 (unable to do) and 3 (not difficult at all). All activities should be performed without the help of flexing the neck or bending the trunk and without the help of first abducting the elbow (i.e., without doing a hornblower sign). Interpretation: The maximal score is 36. A higher score means that the patient is able to perform ADL activities with enough strength in external and internal rotation | Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| SINGLE ASSESSMENT NUMERIC EVALUATION (SANE) | Content: 1 question: 'how would you rate your shoulder today as a percentage of normal?'. Scoring: percentage between 0 and 100% Interpretation: 100% being a normal shoulder. | Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| EUROQOL 5-DIMENSIONS 5-LEVEL (EQ-5D-5L) | Content: 5 questions + EQ-5D VAS for general health. Scoring: 5-response scale (from 'no problems' to 'extreme problems') + VAS percentage between 0 (worst imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). Interpretation: VAS score for general health indicates how a patient perceives his general health, Other questions are descriptive for problems in mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/ discomfort, anxiety/depression. | Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| GRONINGEN ACTIVITY RESTRICTION SCALE (GARS-4) | Content: 18 questions to identify problems with self-sufficiency in self-care and housekeeping. Patients do not respond if they do that activity but rather if they could do that activity. Scoring: ordinal scale from 1 (Yes, I can do that on my own without any effort) up to 4 (No, I can't do that on my own, but only with the help of others). Interpretation: A higher score (max 72) is related to a lower self-sufficiency. | Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| EXERCISE ADHERENCE RATING SCALE (EARS) | Content: 3 sections section A: 6 questions to evaluate the prescribed exercises. section B: 6 questions on how a patient does the recommended exercises or activities. section C: 10 statements on why a patient does or does not do the recommended exercises or activities. Scoring: sections B and C: 5-point Likert scale (0 - 4) (some questions scored reversed). Interpretation: section B (range 0 - 24): a higher score indicates a better compliance/adherence . section C (range 0 - 40): a higher score indicates a better adherence. | Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| EXERCISE DIARY | Content: performed exercises, household activities, VAS pain. Diary on paper for physio-group, by the app for the app-group. | Daily post-surgery (week 0 - week 12) |
| SELF-EFFICACY FOR EXERCISES (SEE) | Content: 9 questions about 'confidence in engaging in exercise 3 times a week for 20 minutes if faced with a barrier'. Scoring: 'not very confident' (0) and 'very confident' (10). Interpretation: The higher the score , the patient feel more confident in performing prescribed exercises. | Week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| GLOBAL RATING OF CHANGE SCALE (GROC) | Content: A single question (How would you currently describe the change in your operated shoulder compared to just before surgery) is scored on a scale, ranging from 'very much worse' through 'unchanged' to 'completely recovered'. Scoring: The scale used is divided in 11 points ( very much worse -5, the same 0, very much better + 5) Interpretation: the number given indicates how a patient perceives the change after surgery. | Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| GLOBAL PERCEIVED EFFECT (GPE/GEE) | Content: 2 questions: To what extent have you recovered from your symptoms?, How satisfied are you with your treatment?. Scoring: a 7-point rating scale. Interpretation: The higher the score , the better. | Prior to surgery, week 3, week 6, week 12, week 52 |
| SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE (SUS) | Content: 10 questions about system satisfaction, usability and learnability. Scoring: 5 response options ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Interpretation: A score above 68 (/100) is considered above average, while a score lower than 68 is considered a below average score. | Week 12 |
| SINGLE EASE QUESTION (SEQ) | Content: 1 question to assess how difficult users find a task. Scoring: 7-point rating scale ranging from very difficult (1) to very easy (7). Interpretation: The average SEQ score is 5.5 (between 5.3 and 5.6). It is advised to ask a more detailed information/ explanation if a score <5 is given. | Week 12 |
| AGE | Content: specify age of participant | Pre-surgery |
| GENDER | Content: specify gender of participant | Pre-surgery |
| DIAGNOSTICS | Content: specify why patient needed a shoulder arthroplasty | Pre-surgery |