Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients hospitalized in ICU with sepsis (infection with life-threatening organ dysfunction according to sepsis 3.0 definitions) or septic shock presumably due to MDR-GNB (multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria). The study will be a prospective multicentre, randomized, open-label comparative continuous vs. intermittent pivotal βL (Beta Lactamine) antibiotic infusion strategies and combination vs. monotherapy trial conducted with a 2X2 factorial design.
The study will be a prospective multicentre, randomized, open-label comparative continuous vs. intermittent pivotal βL antibiotic infusion strategies and combination vs. monotherapy trial conducted with a 2X2 factorial design.
Patients will be randomized to one of four of the following treatment groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified on the centre and the initial βL administered (meropenem versus other) to receive (i) βL antibiotic either as a continuous infusion: CID group or as intermittent infusion: IID group, and (ii) either at most 1 dose (short duration) : AMT group or 5 days (long duration) : ACT group of aminoglycoside
The primary objective of the study is to compare the 30-day mortality of patients with hospital-acquired sepsis in the ICU according to the mode of administration of the pivotal βL antibiotic (CID group vs. IID group).
The primary endpoint is the mortality rate at day 30 between CID and IID groups while the Co-primary objective is to compare the MAKE 30 (Major Adverse Kidney Events within 30 days) between patients that will receive an appropriate monotherapy with βL (AMT group) or an appropriate combination therapy with βL and 5 days of AG (ACT group).
moreover, The co-primary criterion is the percentage of patients with a MAKE 30, i.e. when patients met one of the following criteria within day 30: in-hospital mortality, receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT) or persistent renal dysfunction (discharge serum creatinine/baseline serum creatinine ≥200%) between AMT and ACT groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| continuous infusion dosing of a pivotal AND AG infusion for 5 days | Experimental | continuous infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (CID group) AND AG infusion for 5 days (long duration) as appropriate combination therapy (ACT group) |
|
| intermittent infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB ND AG infusion for 5 days | Experimental | intermittent infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (IID = control group) AND AG infusion for 5 days (long duration) as appropriate combination therapy (ACT = group) |
|
| continuous infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB AND AG infusion at most 1 dose | Experimental | continuous infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (CID group) AND AG infusion at most 1 dose (AMT group ) |
|
| intermittent infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB AND AG infusion at most 1 dose | Experimental | intermittent infusion dosing of a pivotal βL-AB (IID = group) AND AG infusion at most 1 dose (AMT group) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| continuous pivotal βL-AB | Drug | continuous pivotal βL-AB |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To compare the 30-day mortality of patients with hospital-acquired sepsis in the ICU | the primary objective is to compare the 30-day mortality of patients with hospital-acquired sepsis in the ICU according to the mode of administration of the pivotal βL antibiotic (CID group vs. IID group). | 30 days after acquiring sepsis |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| New carriage, colonization or infection with one of the following BMR-GNB: at days 3, 7 and 30: | Percentage of patients with new carriage of MDR-GNB(taking into account all clinical samples and rectal surveillance swabs performed routinely each week),i.e one of the following ticarcillin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Acinetobacter baumannii,or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; extended-spectrum β-lactam-producing Entero bacteriaceae;high-concentration cephalosporinase producing AmpC Enterobacteriaceae; |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults (≥ 18 years)
Hospital-acquired sepsis (according to sepsis 3.0 definitions) :
One of the following risk factors for gram negative multidrug resistant pathogens:
Appropriate bacteriological sampling performed before starting antimicrobial therapy
Expected stay in ICU of more than 3 days
Exclusion Criteria:
A priori known resistance to all the proposed beta-lactams or to amikacin
Need for extrarenal treatment at inclusion according to the criteria of Gaudry et al.
Known hypersensitivity to ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, meropenem, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftazolane-avibactam or to any of the excipients included in the corresponding pharmaceutical drugs,
Known hypersensitivity to any cephalosporin antibacterial agent,
Know hypersentitivity to any penem antibacterial agent,
Severe known hypersensitivity (eg, anaphylactic reaction, severe skin reaction) to any other beta-lactam antibiotic (eg, penicillins or monobactam ) or to any of its excipients.
Known contraindication to the aminoglycoside family including
Non-complicated urinary tract infection (corresponding to a positive ECBU not responsible for sepsis)
Bone marrow transplant or chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
Infections for which long-term antibiotic treatment > 8 days is strongly recommended (i.e., infective endocarditis, osteoarticular infections, anterior mediastinitis after cardiac surgery, hepatic or cerebral abscesses, chronic prostatitis for instance
Presence of antibiotic therapyfor the new sepsis before randomisation: (> 2 doses of antibiotics or > 16h for continuous infusion
Limitation of life support (comfort care applied only) at the time of screening
Enrolment to another interventional drug study
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Subject deprived of freedom, subject under a legal protective measure
Non affiliation to any health insurance system
Refusal to participate to the study (patient or legal representative or family member or close relative if present)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jean-François TIMSIT, MD-PhD | Contact | 01.40.25.77.07 | jean-françois.timsit@aphp.fr | |
| Lila BOUADMA, MD-PhD | Contact | 01.40.25.77.07 | lila.bouadma@aphp.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Aline DECHANET | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Amiens-Picardie | Withdrawn | Amiens | 80054 | France | ||
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will be a prospective multicentre, randomized, open-label comparative continuous vs. intermittent pivotal βL antibiotic infusion strategies and combination vs. monotherapy trial conducted with a 2X2 factorial design
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| intermittent pivotal βL-AB | Drug | intermittent pivotal βL-AB (IID = control group) |
|
|
| AG infusion most 1 dose | Drug | AG infusion most 1 dose (AMT group ) |
|
|
| AG infusion for 5 days | Drug | AG infusion for 5 days (ACT Group) |
|
|
| days 3,7and 30 |
| 30 day mortality in patient with proven Gram-negative infection | Mortality rate at day 30 in patients with proven GNI | 30 days after inclusion |
| 30 day mortality in patient with proven non-fermentative GNI | Mortality rate at day 30 in patients with proven non-fermentative GNI, | 30 days after inclusion |
| 30 day mortality in patient with proven GNI for which the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the βL used were higher to the breakpoints according to the European committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). | Mortality rate at day 30 in patients with proven GNI for which the MIC of the βL used were higher to the accepted break-points | 30 days after inclusion |
| 30-day mortality in patients that received non-carbapenem-βL | Mortality rate at day 30 in patients that received non-carbapenem-βL | 30 days after inclusion |
| 30-day clinical recovery | Clinical recovery at day 30 defined as admission clinical symptom resolved | 30 days after inclusion |
| 30-day clinical recovery | Clinical recovery at day 30 defined as admission organ failures resolved with persistence of admission clinical symptoms and time to clinical recovery | 30 days after inclusion |
| PK-PD (pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic) target attainment | PK-PD target attainment rate evaluated as a dichotomous variable o For βL (trough or plateau concentration according to randomization group), at day 1, i.e. 24 hours after the loading dose and at day 3, i.e. 72 hours after the loading dose § Target attainment scored "Yes" if measured drug concentration exceeded greater than four times to the causative pathogen MIC as 100% fT > 4*MIC | at day 1, i.e. 24 hours after the loading dose and at day 3, i.e. 72 hours after the loading dose |
| PK-PD (pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic) target attainment | For AG, 30 min after the end of the first infusion dose (CMAX) § Target attainment scored "Yes" if measured drug concentration to causative pathogen MIC ratio is greater than 12 as CMAX/MIC > 12 | 30 min after the end of the first infusion dose (CMAX) |
| Superinfection (primary infection site) or new infection (different infection site) at day 30 due to a GNB resistant to the βL administered at inclusion | Percentage of patients with superinfection or new nosocomial infection with GNB resistant to the βL administered at inclusion until day 30 | 30 days after inclusion |
| Microbiological failure persistence of the same microorganism at the same site at end-of-therapy (EOT) or within 7 days after EOT. | Percentage of patients for whom the microorganism is still recovered in bacterial culture from the initial infected site at EOT or within 7 days after EOT | 7 days after inclusion |
| New carriage, colonization or infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa not susceptible to the βL administered at days 3, 7 and 30 | Percentage of patients with new carriage colonization or infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa not susceptible to the βL administered until day 30 | 30 days after inclusion |
| Duration of organ failure between day 1 and day 30 | Organ failures assessed by AUCSOFA and its organ components measured between day 1 and day 30 | day 1 and day 30 |
| Length of ICU and hospital stays | Length of ICU and hospital stays until day 30 | 30 days after inclusion |
| Occurrence of adverse events at day 30 | Percentage of patients with encephalopathy (delay between inclusion and 2 RASS scores = -1 in a row) or renal failure at discharge (RRT or persistent renal dysfunction) until day 30 | 30 days after inclusion |
| 180-day mortality | Mortality rate at day 180 | 180 days after inclusion |
| Réanimation polyvalente - CH d'Argenteuil - Hôpital Victor Dupuy |
| Recruiting |
| Argenteuil |
| 95100 |
| France |
|
| Réanimation polyvalente - CH Avignon | Recruiting | Avignon | 84000 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin | Recruiting | Bordeaux | 33000 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation - Ambroise Paré | Recruiting | Boulogne-Billancourt | 92100 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Gabriel Montpied | Recruiting | Clermont-Ferrand | 63003 | France |
|
| Anesthésie - Réanimation - Beaujon | Recruiting | Clichy | 92110 | France |
|
| Réanimation polyvalente/Surveillance continue - CH Sud Essonne-Etampes | Recruiting | Étampes | 91150 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation-Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée | Recruiting | La Roche-sur-Yon | 85000 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Grenoble-Alpes Hôpital Michallon | Recruiting | La Tronche | 38700 | France |
|
| Réanimation polyvalente - CH de Versailles - Hôpital André Mignot | Recruiting | Le Chesnay | 78150 | France |
|
| Réanimation Médico Chirurgicale & USC - CH Le Mans | Recruiting | Le Mans | 72037 | France |
|
| Médecine Intensive Réanimation - Hôpital Croix Rousse | Recruiting | Lyon | 69004 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation - HCL - Edouard Herriot | Recruiting | Lyon | 69437 | France |
|
| Réanimation polyvalente - CHR Metz-Thionville - Hôpital de Mercy | Recruiting | Metz | 57085 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie | Recruiting | Montpellier | 34295 | France |
|
| Réanimation Chirurgicale - Saint Eloi | Recruiting | Montpellier | 34295 | France |
|
| Médecine Intensive Réanimation - Pasteur 2 | Recruiting | Nice | 06100 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Nice - Hôpital Archet | Recruiting | Nice | 06202 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation | Recruiting | Orléans | 45000 | France |
|
| Anesthésie - Réanimation - CHU Orléans | Recruiting | Orléans | 86000 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive et réanimation infectieuse - Bichat | Recruiting | Paris | 75018 | France |
|
| Réanimation chirurgicale - Bichat | Recruiting | Paris | 75018 | France |
|
| Institut Mutualiste du Montsouris | Recruiting | Paris | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU Poitiers - Site de la Milétrie | Recruiting | Poitiers | 86000 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive et réanimation polyvalente 6 CHU de Reims - Hôpital Robert Debré | Withdrawn | Reims | 51100 | France |
| Médecine intensive - réanimation-CH St Denis - Hôpital Delafontaine | Recruiting | Saint-Denis | 93200 | France |
|
| Médecine intensive - réanimation - CHU de Strasbourg - Nouvel Hôpital Civil | Recruiting | Strasbourg | 67091 | France |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018805 | Sepsis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
| D018746 | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided