Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to estimate the importance of neuroimaging in accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) for depression. Participants will receive aiTBS treatment, but they will not know if their treatment spot was found with neuroimaging or head measurements.
Techniques for modulating human brain networks are rapidly evolving. One of the most exciting new developments is accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS), a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol that involves multiple daily treatments rather than gold standard once daily treatment. A specific accelerated iTBS protocol called Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT) was cleared by the FDA in September 2022 based on two pilot studies in which patients with treatment-resistant depression rapidly and robustly improved with SAINT. Many of these patients had been depressed for decades and had not improved with conventional TMS or electroconvulsive therapy. Despite these promising results, two issues may limit SAINT scalability: 1) SAINT has only been tested at a single site in a small number of patients, 2) SAINT has never been tested without individualized resting state functional connectivity (rsfc) targeting, which is not widely available or covered by insurance. In this pilot trial, patients with treatment-resistant depression (n=40) will be randomized to one of two active treatment arms: 1) Real aiTBS with real individualized rsfc targeting, or 2) Real aiTBS with sham individualized rsfc targeting (i.e. conventional TMS targeting based on scalp landmarks). All patients will receive active stimulation, which will facilitate enrollment and reduce ethical concerns about placebo treatment in a vulnerable population when there is existing evidence of treatment efficacy. Patients and clinicians will be blind to group assignment, and blind integrity will be assessed. All patients will undergo MRI scans immediately before treatment and at one month follow up, which aligns with our clinical outcome measures.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| real individualized resting state functional connectivity targeting | Other | Participants in this group will receive aiTBS with neuronavigation to a treatment target identified with individualized resting state functional connectivity. |
|
| sham individualized resting state functional connectivity targeting | Other | Participants in this group will receive aiTBS with neuronavigation to a treatment target identified with head measurements (i.e., Beam F3) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| transcranial magnetic stimulation | Procedure | Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a focal, non-invasive form of brain stimulation that has FDA clearance for depression. In this study, a form of TMS called accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation will be administered under the supervision of a physician with TMS expertise. This protocol will be modeled after the FDA cleared Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT) protocol, but the patented SAINT rsfc targeting algorithm will not be used for either arm. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Montgomery-Ã…sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | Depression severity rating scale (0-60, higher numbers indicate higher severity). The primary outcome measure was the baseline-adjusted MADRS score one month after treatment. The primary analysis of this primary outcome measure was the effect size of connectivity-based targeting. | Baseline, one month after treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | Depression severity rating scales (0-63, higher numbers indicate higher severity) | Screening, Day 5 of Treatment, 1 Week Post Treatment, & 1 Month Post Treatment |
| Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) | Depression severity rating scales (0-27, higher numbers indicate higher severity) | Baseline, one month after treatment |
| Temperament and Character Inventory, Revised 140-item |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joseph J Taylor, MD, PhD | Brigham and Women's Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02115 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42340706 | Derived | Taylor JJ, Kare MR, Haj-Darwish D, Jones E, Sanderson L, Khosravani S, Leach J, Bomer L, Hall N, Chiulli N, Steuber E, Lin C, Drew W, Palm ST, Chandra A, Frandsen SB, Bekou A, Barbour T, Baratono SR, Gonsalvez I, Lyndon S, Schaper FLWVJ, Wang W, Silbersweig D, Siddiqi SH, Fox MD. Connectivity- vs Scalp-Based Targeting of Accelerated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2026 Jun 24. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.1100. Online ahead of print. |
Not provided
Not provided
De-identified survey response data and/or neuroimaging data may be shared with collaborators for further analysis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 40 participants were assigned to either a connectivity-based target or scalp-based target. Participants were ineligible after screening due to the following reasons: not meeting depression threshold cutoffs (<20 BDI/MADRS & mild Maudsley Staging Method) defined by inclusion criteria, history of tinnitus (ringing in the ears), symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, risk of seizure, active symptoms of substance use disorder, and history of brain tumor.
Recruitment ran July 2023-March 2025. Recruitment sources included Rally, Mass General Brigham outpatient clinics/healthcare providers, and clinicaltrials.gov. Additionally, flyers were posted around the greater Mass General Brigham area.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Connectivity-based Targeting | Participants in this group received high-dose accelerated TMS with neuronavigation to a connectivity-based target, which was defined as the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex region with the greatest correlation to a published and publicly available convergent depression circuit. This circuit includes multiple brain regions causally linked to depression, including negative connectivity to the subgenual cingulate cortex. |
| FG001 | Scalp-based Targeting | Participants in this group received aiTBS with neuronavigation to a treatment target identified with with the Beam F3 method. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Connectivity-based Targeting | Participants in this group received high-dose aTMS with neuronavigation to a connectivity-based target, which was defined as the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex region with the greatest correlation to a published and publicly available convergent depression circuit. This circuit includes multiple brain regions causally linked to depression, including negative connectivity to the subgenual cingulate cortex. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Montgomery-Ã…sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | Depression severity rating scale (0-60, higher numbers indicate higher severity). The primary outcome measure was the baseline-adjusted MADRS score one month after treatment. The primary analysis of this primary outcome measure was the effect size of connectivity-based targeting. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Scores on scale | Baseline, one month after treatment |
|
Day 1 to day 5 of treatment
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Connectivity-based Targeting | Participants in this group received high-dose aTMS with neuronavigation to a connectivity-based target, which was defined as the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex region with the greatest correlation to a published and publicly available convergent depression circuit. This circuit includes multiple brain regions causally linked to depression, including negative connectivity to the subgenual cingulate cortex. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scalp discomfort | General disorders | Systematic Assessment | Participants completed daily safety questionnaire during treatment. |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph J. Taylor, MD, PhD | Brigham & Women's Hospital, Mass General Brigham | 6175253536 | bwstmstrials@bwh.harvard.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 29, 2024 | Apr 1, 2026 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003865 | Depressive Disorder, Major |
| D003863 | Depression |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050781 | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055909 | Magnetic Field Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Parallel-group double-blind randomized controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will put on a swim cap and undergo treatment site-marking according to standard protocols. All individuals will get two treatment sites marked: 1) Their individualized target based on resting state functional connectivity data, and 2) Beam F3 target based on head measurements. One group will be treated at target #1, and the other group will be treated at target #2.
Neither group will be able to see the computer screen that shows the neuronavigation in real-time, although they will be able to see their MRI scan on a monitor.
|
|
Anxiety severity rating scale (0-63, higher numbers indicate higher severity)
| Screening, Day 5 of Treatment, 1 Week Post Treatment, & 1 Month Post Treatment |
| Montgomery-Ã…sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | Depression severity rating scale (0-60, higher numbers indicate higher severity). The primary analysis of the primary outcome will be the effect size of imaging-guided accelerated TMS relative to scalp-targeted TMS. In other words, the "number needed to scan." This outcome has not changed since the original grant application for this study and the data remain blinded at the time of this clarification. Actual group differences will be explored in a secondary analysis of this primary outcome measure. | Baseline & 1 Month Post Treatment |
| Change in Resting State Functional Connectivity in the Depression Network | Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal. | Baseline, one month after treatment |
Psychobiologically-based personality inventory which measures seven personality dimensions (harm avoidance, novelty seeking, reward dependence, persistence, self-directedness, cooperativeness, and persistence). For each dimension, this yields a scaled T-score (mean score of 50 with standard deviation of 10). This is an overall estimate of personality traits, and there are no "better" or "worse" traits.
| Baseline, one month after treatment |
| Emotional Conflict Resolution Task | Computer task measuring accuracy and reaction time | Baseline, one month after treatment |
| Learning, Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT) | Computer task measuring accuracy and reaction time | Baseline, one month after treatment |
| Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40) | Computer task measuring accuracy and reaction time | Baseline, one month after treatment |
| Death Suicide IAT (DSIAT) | Computer task measuring reaction time | Baseline, one month after treatment |
| BG001 | Scalp-based Targeting | Participants in this group received high-dose aTMS with neuronavigation to a treatment target identified with the Beam F3 method. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Scalp-based Targeting | Participants in this group received aiTBS with neuronavigation to a treatment target identified with with the Beam F3 method. |
|
|
| Secondary | Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | Depression severity rating scales (0-63, higher numbers indicate higher severity) | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Scores on scale | Screening, Day 5 of Treatment, 1 Week Post Treatment, & 1 Month Post Treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) | Anxiety severity rating scale (0-63, higher numbers indicate higher severity) | Delay in measure's data collection contributing to a total of 11 participants not completing the BAI at screening. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Scores on scale | Screening, Day 5 of Treatment, 1 Week Post Treatment, & 1 Month Post Treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Montgomery-Ã…sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | Depression severity rating scale (0-60, higher numbers indicate higher severity). The primary analysis of the primary outcome will be the effect size of imaging-guided accelerated TMS relative to scalp-targeted TMS. In other words, the "number needed to scan." This outcome has not changed since the original grant application for this study and the data remain blinded at the time of this clarification. Actual group differences will be explored in a secondary analysis of this primary outcome measure. | This secondary outcome was not analyzed. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Scores on scale | Baseline & 1 Month Post Treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Resting State Functional Connectivity in the Depression Network | Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal. | Not Posted | Feb 2027 | Baseline, one month after treatment | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) | Depression severity rating scales (0-27, higher numbers indicate higher severity) | Not Posted | Feb 2027 | Baseline, one month after treatment | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Temperament and Character Inventory, Revised 140-item | Psychobiologically-based personality inventory which measures seven personality dimensions (harm avoidance, novelty seeking, reward dependence, persistence, self-directedness, cooperativeness, and persistence). For each dimension, this yields a scaled T-score (mean score of 50 with standard deviation of 10). This is an overall estimate of personality traits, and there are no "better" or "worse" traits. | Not Posted | Feb 2027 | Baseline, one month after treatment | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Emotional Conflict Resolution Task | Computer task measuring accuracy and reaction time | This pre-specified outcome was not analyzed. | Posted | Baseline, one month after treatment |
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Learning, Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT) | Computer task measuring accuracy and reaction time | This pre-specified outcome was not analyzed. | Posted | Baseline, one month after treatment |
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40) | Computer task measuring accuracy and reaction time | This pre-specified outcome was not analyzed. | Posted | Baseline, one month after treatment |
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Death Suicide IAT (DSIAT) | Computer task measuring reaction time | This pre-specified outcome was not analyzed. | Posted | Baseline, one month after treatment |
|
|
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 16 |
| 20 |
| EG001 | Scalp-based Targeting | Participants in this group received high-dose aTMS with neuronavigation to a treatment target identified with the Beam F3 method. | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 14 | 20 |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment | Participants completed daily safety questionnaire during treatment. |
|
| Face twitching/tingling | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment | Participants completed daily safety questionnaire during treatment. |
|
| Tinnitus (ringing in the ears) | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Worsening symptoms of depression | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment | Participants completed daily safety questionnaire during treatment. |
|
| Worsening symptoms of anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment | Participants completed daily safety questionnaire during treatment. |
|
| Suicidal Ideation | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| 1 Week Post Treatment |
|
| 1 Month Post Treatment |
|
| 1 Week Post Treatment |
|
| 1 Month Post Treatment |
|