Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In addition to objective criteria (no episode period for 6 months) for defining and monitoring recovery, evaluation of subjective criteria is also very important. Various Turkish scales related to recovery in progressive diseases have been developed or validity-reliability studies have been conducted. However, as far as we know, there is no scale that evaluates subjective improvement for a disorder such as bipolar disorder that progresses in episodes and has a heterogeneous appearance of loss of functionality. In this study, we aimed to conduct a validity and reliability study of the recovery questionnaire for BDD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| validity and realibility of scale | Other | Turkish validity and realibility of Bipolar Recovery Questionnare |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| validity and reability of scale | turkish validity and reability of Bipolar Recovery Questionnare | 5 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Bipolar Affective Disorder
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilecik Seyh Edebali University Faculty of Medicine | Bilecik | 11000 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided