Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Hofstra University | OTHER |
| New York University | OTHER |
| University of Vermont | OTHER |
| University of Sydney |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a pediatric motor-based speech sound disorder that requires a specialized approach to intervention (Maas et al., 2014). The extant literature on the treatment of CAS commonly recommends intensive treatment using a motor-based approach, with some of the best evidence supporting the use of Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC; Strand, 2020). To date, a rigorous and systematic comparison of high and low dose frequency has not been undertaken for DTTC, resulting in a lack of evidence to guide decisions about the optimal treatment schedule for this intervention. The current study aims to fill this gap in knowledge by comparing treatment outcomes when dose frequency is varied.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether the number of treatment sessions per week has an effect on intervention outcomes in 60 children with CAS. The main question this research will address is whether whole word accuracy will differ between two groups of children undergoing DTTC treatment when one group of children receives treatment twice a week for 12 weeks and the other group receives treatment 4 times a week for 6 weeks. Community clinicians will administer all treatment sessions.
Sixty children with childhood apraxia of speech will be treated with DTTC treatment. A Phase III randomized controlled trial with parallel groups will be conducted to compare effects of low versus high dose frequency on DTTC treatment outcomes in children with CAS. Children with CAS between 2;5-7;11 years of age will be recruited to participate in this study. Treatment will be provided in the community setting by speech-language pathologists who have completed specialized training administering DTTC in a research reliable manner.
True randomization with concealed allocation will be used to assign children to either the low or high dose frequency group. Treatment will be administered in 1-hour sessions either 4 times per week over a 6-week period (high dose) or 2 times per week over a 12-week period (low dose) for a total of 24 hours per child. To measure treatment gains, probe data will be collected before treatment, during treatment, and 1 day, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks post-treatment. Probe data will consist of customized treated words and a standard set of untreated words to assess generalization of treatment gains. The primary outcome variable will be whole word accuracy, a measure of segmental, phonotactic, and suprasegmental accuracy.
This will be the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate dose frequency for DTTC treatment in children with CAS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Dose Frequency | Experimental | This group will receive treatment 4x/week for 6 weeks |
|
| Low Dose Frequency | Active Comparator | This group will receive treatment 2x/week for 12 weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing Treatment | Behavioral | DTTC is a dynamic, motor-based treatment approach designed for children with severe CAS. This approach is based on Integral Stimulation (Edeal & Gildersleeve-Neumann, 2011; Maas & Farinella, 2012; Maas et al., 2019; Strand & Debertine, 2000; Strand & Skinder, 1999), in which the clinician instructs the child to "listen to me, watch me, and do what I do" and systematically taxes and supports the speech motor system to facilitate system-wide change in speech output (Strand, 2020). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes to whole word accuracy | A multi-factor whole word accuracy measure (Multilevel word Accuracy Composite Scale; Case et al., under review) that systematically accounts for segmental and prosodic accuracy, word shape maintenance, and smoothness and fluency of movement transitions will be calculated on treated and similar untreated words in the generalization probe. | Pre to post-treatment follow-up (6-12 weeks of treatment plus 12 weeks post completion of treatment) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Phoneme accuracy | Percentage of phonemes correct on the generalization probe | Pre to post-treatment follow-up (6-12 weeks of treatment plus 12 weeks post completion of treatment) |
| Speech Intelligibility |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel, PhD | Marquette University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marquette U | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53201 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Wiig, E. H., Secord, W. A., & Semel, E. M. (2020). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals - Preschool (3rd ed.). Pearson. | ||
| 31846588 | Result | Strand EA. Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing: A Treatment Strategy for Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):30-48. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0005. Epub 2019 Dec 17. | |
| 25313348 |
Not provided
Not provided
Deidentified individual level data will be shared.
Beginning 6 months after publication. No end date.
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and evidence of ethical conduct of research and appropriate institutional oversight (e.g., IRB). Proposals should be directed to jenya.iuzzini-seigel@marquette.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to complete and sign a data sharing agreement.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001072 | Apraxias |
| D066229 | Speech Sound Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011596 | Psychomotor Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Remarkable Speech and Movement | UNKNOWN |
The proposed work is multisite Phase III parallel-group RCT that aims to investigate the outcomes of DTTC in children with CAS and determine whether dose frequency impacts response to treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
Calculated based on the Intelligibility in Context Scale (McLeod et al., 2012), a parent survey measure
| Pre to post-treatment follow-up (6-12 weeks of treatment plus 4 weeks post completion of treatment) |
| Functional communication | Calculated based on the Functional Outcomes on Communication Under Six (Thomas-Stonell et al., 2015), a parent survey measure | Pre to post-treatment follow-up (6-12 weeks of treatment plus 4 weeks post treatment) |
| Result |
| Maas E, Gildersleeve-Neumann C, Jakielski KJ, Stoeckel R. Motor-based intervention protocols in treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2014 Sep;1(3):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s40474-014-0016-4. |
| 21330650 | Result | Edeal DM, Gildersleeve-Neumann CE. The importance of production frequency in therapy for childhood apraxia of speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 May;20(2):95-110. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/09-0005). Epub 2011 Feb 17. |
| 22207698 | Result | Maas E, Farinella KA. Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Apr;55(2):561-78. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0120). Epub 2011 Dec 29. |
| 31425660 | Result | Maas E, Gildersleeve-Neumann C, Jakielski K, Kovacs N, Stoeckel R, Vradelis H, Welsh M. Bang for Your Buck: A Single-Case Experimental Design Study of Practice Amount and Distribution in Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Sep 20;62(9):3160-3182. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0212. Epub 2019 Aug 19. |
| 35523425 | Result | Iuzzini-Seigel J, Allison KM, Stoeckel R. A Tool for Differential Diagnosis of Childhood Apraxia of Speech and Dysarthria in Children: A Tutorial. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2022 Oct 6;53(4):926-946. doi: 10.1044/2022_LSHSS-21-00164. Epub 2022 May 6. |
| 28384695 | Result | Shriberg LD, Strand EA, Fourakis M, Jakielski KJ, Hall SD, Karlsson HB, Mabie HL, McSweeny JL, Tilkens CM, Wilson DL. A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: Introduction. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):S1094-S1095. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0148. |
| Result | Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (2015). Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation - Third Edition (GFTA-3). Pearson Assessments. |
| Result | Strand, E. A., & Debertine, P. (2000). The efficacy of integral stimulation intervention with developmental apraxia of speech. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8(4), 295-300. |
| Result | Strand, E. A., & McCauley, R. J. (2019). The Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skill (DEMSS). Brookes. |
| Result | Thomas-Stonell, N., Oddson, B., Robertson, B., Walker, J. & Rosenbaum, P. (2015). The FOCUSĀ©-34: Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six. Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON. http://www.focusoutcomemeasurement.ca |
| Result | Wiig, E. H., Semel, E. M., & Secord, W. A. (2013). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals - 5. Pearson. |
| 37226208 | Derived | Iuzzini-Seigel J, Case J, Grigos MI, Velleman SL, Thomas D, Murray E. Dose frequency randomized controlled trial for Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC) treatment for childhood apraxia of speech: protocol paper. BMC Pediatr. 2023 May 25;23(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04066-2. |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D003147 | Communication Disorders |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |