Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R21NR020231 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Worcester Polytechnic Institute | OTHER |
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | NIH |
| National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) | NIH |
| Johns Hopkins University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal is to pilot test a highly accessible, web-based, pragmatic, scalable intervention to overcome ongoing problems with high stakes decision-making by surrogate decision-makers of patients in ICUs with severe acute brain injury (SABI), including those with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury, large hemispheric acute ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage.
Every 30 seconds an adult in the U.S. suffers a severe acute brain injury (SABI) from traumatic brain injury or large ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, resulting in 200,000 deaths and >900,000 survivors living with disability annually. Every day, surrogate decision-makers face the difficult "goals of care" decision in intensive care units (ICUs) to continue or withdraw life support while considering the patient's long-term prognosis. In this study, we will pilot test a pragmatic, scalable intervention to overcome ongoing problems with high stakes decision-making by surrogates of patients with SABI in ICUs. These problems are an important target for intervention, because they contribute to 3 major clinical and public health issues: 1) family members struggle in the role of surrogate, leading to lasting symptoms of psychological distress; 2) clinicians are poorly trained in communicating prognosis after SABI, often doing so with variability and bias, inadequately preparing families for their decisions; 3) patients often receive burdensome treatments that they would not choose.
Decision aids improve the quality of patients' decisions based on a large evidence-base, but no empirically validated tools currently exist for surrogate decision-making in SABI patients at high risk for death or disability. This is problematic because surrogates of SABI patients are unprepared for the difficult decisions about the use of life support and patients' potential long-term disability, which hinge on both medical information and the patient's values and preferences. We have developed and refined a tailored digital, web-based decision aid (DA) for families of critically ill SABI patients, conceptually grounded in the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, to enhance, not replace, clinician-family communication. We will leverage a digital platform, which is portable and shareable among family members when geographically distant or not allowed to visit the ICU (as during the COVID-19 pandemic) and allows integration of videos to reach lower-literacy groups. This innovative tool challenges the existing paradigm for decision-making in SABI patients.
This pilot study among 50 surrogates of SABI patients and their clinicians will assess the feasibility of deploying the web-based tool as well as to explore the tools impact on measures of communication and decision-quality.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web-based Decision Aid + Communication (DA+C) tool | Experimental | Surrogate(s) will read/click through the DA+C tool prior to the clinician-family meeting and complete the integrated worksheet. Surrogate(s) will have unlimited access to the DA+C tool and may return to the tool and edit the worksheet at any time. |
|
| Usual Care | No Intervention | No decision aid |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Web/mobile/tablet-based digital decision aid + communication (DA+C) tool | Behavioral | The web/mobile/tablet-based digital DA+C toll is designed to enhance communication and shared decision making between clinicians and surrogates of critically ill severe acute brain injury (SABI) with four goals: to 1) prepare families for their surrogate role and discussions with clinicians; 2) provide balanced information to families on prognosis and all available treatment options; 3) provide tailored information about the patient and family to clinicians in advance of family meetings; and 4) serve as a communication guide for clinicians in the clinician-family meeting to facilitate shared decision-making. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of tool use by surrogate decision-makers | Data tracking analytics built into the tool will be employed to determine the extent to which the tools is used as per protocol. | Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks |
| Feasibility of enrolling surrogates in a stepped-wedge (before/after) clinical trial in a neurocritical care setting | Measured by meeting target enrollment. | Through study completion, estimated 18 months past primary start date |
| Feasibility of retaining surrogates in a neurocritical care setting | The number of subjects that complete the long-term follow-up. | Three-months post SABI |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Participants' ratings of usability of the tool (Intervention surrogates only) | Usability of the tool as measured with the System Usability Scale. | Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks |
| Participants' ratings of perceived effectiveness of the tool in preparing them for decision-making (Intervention surrogates only) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Participants' ratings of what they liked and disliked about the DA+C tool (Intervention surrogates only) | Measured by two open ended questions from the Acceptability Scale. | Until right before the scheduled clinician-family meeting, an average of 10-14 days after admission |
| Surrogates' clarity about patient values & preferences |
Inclusion criteria for surrogates and patients:
Exclusion Criteria for surrogates and patients:
Inclusion criteria for clinicians:
Exclusion criteria for clinicians:
- unwillingness to comply with study protocol.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nils Henninger, MD, PhD | University of Massachusetts, Worcester | Principal Investigator |
| Susanne Muehlschlegel, MD, MPH | Johns Hopkins University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center | Baltimore | Maryland | 21224 | United States | ||
| Johns Hopkins Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35853748 | Background | Muehlschlegel S, Goostrey K, Flahive J, Zhang Q, Pach JJ, Hwang DY. Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of a Goals-of-Care Decision Aid for Surrogates of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury. Neurology. 2022 Oct 3;99(14):e1446-e1455. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200937. | |
| 33786434 | Background | Goostrey KJ, Lee C, Jones K, Quinn T, Moskowitz J, Pach JJ, Knies AK, Shutter L, Goldberg R, Mazor KM, Hwang DY, Muehlschlegel S. Adapting a Traumatic Brain Injury Goals-of-Care Decision Aid for Critically Ill Patients to Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Hemispheric Acute Ischemic Stroke. Crit Care Explor. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):e0357. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000357. eCollection 2021 Mar. |
Not provided
Not provided
Anonymized data not published within the final manuscript will be made available by request from any qualified investigator.
After publication of the main manuscript up until 5 years after publication.
Requests should be made to the principal investigator smuehlsch[at]jhu.edu
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
stepped-wedge randomized trial (before-after study)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Perceived Effectiveness will be measured with an 11-item perceived effectiveness questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale. |
| Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks |
| Fidelity to intervention protocol | Fidelity to the intervention protocol will be measured using self-checklists by clinicians and review of a random selection of 30% of the audio-recorded clinician-family meetings | Through study completion, estimated 18 months past primary start date |
We will apply the 3-item Values Clarity Subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale. |
| After the scheduled clinician-family meeting, an average of 10-14 days after admission |
| Surrogates' ratings of the degree of shared decision-making | We will apply six questions from Quality of Communication Scale pertaining to shared decision-making. | After the scheduled clinician-family meeting, an average of 10-14 days after admission |
| Caregiver Burden | Measured with the 5-item short form of the Caregiver Burden Scale. | Three-months post SABI |
| Decision Regret | Measured using the Decision Regret Scale. | Three-months post SABI |
| Goals-of-care decision | Final goals-of-care decision by surrogates (survival vs. withdrawal of life sustaining treatments) | Hospital discharge up until 3-months post SABI |
| Mortality | Patient death | Hospital discharge up until 3-months post SABI |
| Functional status | We will measure basic activities of daily living with the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE; range 1-8) and the modified Rankin Scale (range 0-6) | 3-months post SABI |
| Patient-perceived Patient- Centeredness of Care | To assess patient centeredness of care adapted for use by surrogates | 3-months post SABI |
| Baltimore |
| Maryland |
| 21287 |
| United States |
| UMass Memorial Hospital | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| 35265851 | Background | Muehlschlegel S, Perman SM, Elmer J, Haggins A, Teixeira Bailey ND, Huang J, Jansky L, Kirchner J, Kasperek-Wynn R, Lipman PD, Yeatts SD, Fetters MD, Dickert NW, Silbergleit R. The Experiences and Needs of Families of Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest and Severe Neurotrauma: The Perspectives of National Key Stakeholders During a National Institutes of Health-Funded Workshop. Crit Care Explor. 2022 Mar 4;4(3):e0648. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000648. eCollection 2022 Mar. |
| 35696329 | Background | Goostrey K, Muehlschlegel S. Prognostication and shared decision making in neurocritical care. BMJ. 2022 Apr 7;377:e060154. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-060154. |
| 32554766 | Background | Muehlschlegel S, Hwang DY, Flahive J, Quinn T, Lee C, Moskowitz J, Goostrey K, Jones K, Pach JJ, Knies AK, Shutter L, Goldberg R, Mazor KM. Goals-of-care decision aid for critically ill patients with TBI: Development and feasibility testing. Neurology. 2020 Jul 14;95(2):e179-e193. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009770. Epub 2020 Jun 17. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000083302 | Hemorrhagic Stroke |
| D000083242 | Ischemic Stroke |
| D000070642 | Brain Injuries, Traumatic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001930 | Brain Injuries |
| D006259 | Craniocerebral Trauma |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided