Comparisons of the Blood Pressure Control Ability Between Hypotension Prediction Index With Non-invasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveforms, Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring With Non-invasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveforms, and Intermittent Blood Pressure Monitoring With Conventional Non-invasive Blood Pressureduring Neuraxial Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparisons of the Blood Pressure Control Ability Between Hypotension Prediction Index With Non-invasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveforms, Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring With Non-invasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveforms, and Intermittent Blood Pressure Monitoring With Conventional Non-invasive Blood Pressureduring Neuraxial Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this study is to compare the blood pressure control ability with HPI, ClearSight, and conventional NIBP during neuraxial anesthesia in cesarean section. The main question it aims to answer is:
Anesthesiologists can have a better control of blood pressure during cesarean section with HPI than with conventional NIBP.
During the surgery, the participants will be monitored with standard monitor and HPI with ClearSight and will be randomly assigned to three groups, including HPI group, ClearSight group, and NIBP group. Anesthesiologists will treat intraoperative hypotension with different protocols according to the participants' allocation. Investigators will compare the time-weighted average mean arterial pressure < 65mmHg with in three groups. Secondary outcomes includes the intraoperative hypotension rate, total duration of hypotension, the hypotension symptoms and signs of parturients.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
shih.poyuan@gmail.com886-2-23123456 ext. 262158