Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to demonstrate, during the first standard surgical management of patients with stage II MRONJ, the effect of the implantation of a cryopreserved hAM on the maxillomandibular bone, on the healing of the oral mucosa.
Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) is a complication of taking anti-tumor (anti-angiogenic) and bone anti-resorptive treatments (biphosphonates, Denosumab) which impact bone healing and renewal capacities, which can lead to bone necrosis. It affects 1 to 10% of patients and is classified into 4 stages.
There is no reference document for their management, which requires antibiotics, local antiseptics and tissue debridement sometimes associated with sequestrectomy. The objective of treatment is very often to obtain healing of the oral mucosa to cover the exposed bone. Without treatment, stage II MRONJ can progress to stage III, with orostoma, pathological fractures and extra-fistula.
The human amniotic membrane (hAM) has poor (even no) immunogenicity and exerts an anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, antimicrobial, antiviral and analgesic effect. It is a source of multipotent stem cells and growth factors that promote tissue regeneration.
A pioneering, non-comparative study reports the use of hAM in MRONJ with very encouraging results in terms of re-epithelialization, absence of pain and infection (Ragazzo 2018). Recently, the same team published a retrospective study where 49 patients (stage 1 to 3) were included, including 27 treated with hAM (Ragazzo 2021). They report a significant improvement in quality of life and pain in the treated group.
hAM would provide a new approach in the treatment of stage II MRONJ by acting on: the quality and speed of mucosal healing, pain, even infection and regeneration of the underlying bone.
This study aims to demonstrate, during the first standard surgical management of patients with stage II MRONJ, the effect of the implantation of a cryopreserved hAM on the maxillomandibular bone, on the healing of the oral mucosa three months after the operation.
In second objectives will be evaluated: pain, complications at the site of healing of the mucosa (erythema, abscess, purulent discharge, diffuse infection of soft tissues (cellulitis), orostoma, suborbital abscess, mandibular fracture), oral health -dental/quality of life and new bone formation at subsequent visits.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application of human amniotic membrane (hAM) | Experimental | After conventional/standard treatment, hAM will be applied in a single layer against the bone defect before closure. |
|
| Conventional/standard treatment | Active Comparator | Conventional/standard surgery. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human Amniotic Membrane | Biological | After conventional/standard treatment, hAM will be applied in a single layer against the bone defect with, if possible, a burial of a few millimeters under the mucous edges. With the idea of apprehending a possible dose effect, the hAM will be adapted to the size of the bone/mucous defect, mesenchymal side against the bone. For closure after hAM grafting : 2 options are possible: Edge-to-edge closure if sufficient mucosal laxity, Edge rapprochement by cross points. If necessary: possible incision of the periosteum to give laxity to the mucosa. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients with re-apparition of bone exposure | Number of patients with re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area | Between Day 1 post-surgery and Month 3 post-surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit | Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area | Day 0 (the day of the surgery) or Day 1 post-surgery |
Not provided
INCLUSION CRITERIA
NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florelle GINDRAUX, PhD | Contact | 033381218998 | fgindraux@chu-besancon.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Aurélien LOUVRIER, MD, PhD | CHU de Besançon | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de Besancon | Recruiting | Besançon | 25030 | France |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C030910 | cancer procoagulant |
| D003226 | Congresses as Topic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009938 | Organizations |
| D004472 | Health Care Economics and Organizations |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomization 3:1
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Conventional/Standard treatment | Other | Surgical procedure: Endo-oral approach:
|
|
| Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit | Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area | Visit 1 (7 to 10 days post-surgery) |
| Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit | Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area | Visit 2 (14 to 15 days post-surgery) |
| Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit | Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area | Visit 3 (One month post-surgery), |
| Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit | Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area | Visit 5 (6 months post-surgery) |
| Number of patient with re-opening of the scar / reappearance of the bone exposure added visually during the control visit | Re-apparition of bone exposure visually observed by the surgeon. Clinical examination: reopening of the scar / reappearance of exposed bone / taking a photograph of the treated area | Visit 6 (12 months post-surgery) |
| To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale | Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage. | Day 0 or Day 1 (if hospitalized patient) |
| To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale | Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage. | Visit 1 (7 to 10 days post-surgery) |
| To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale | Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage. | Visit 2 (14 to 15 days post-surgery) |
| To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale | Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage. | Visit 3 ( 1 Month post-surgery) |
| To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale | Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage. | Visit 4 (3 Month post-surgery), |
| To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale | Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage. | Visit 5 (6 Month post-surgery) |
| To assess pain with Visual Analogue Scale | Pain assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This EVA scale will be supplemented by a collection of information on the use of analgesics if necessary. Also patients who would have to take analgesics will fill out a "logbook" which will specify the class of the drug and the dosage. | Visit 6 ( 12 Month post-surgery) |
| Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing | On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of:
| Day 0 or Day 1 post-surgery (if hospitalized patient) |
| Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing | On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of:
| visit 1 (7 to 10 days post-surgery) |
| Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing | On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of:
| Visit 2 (14 to 15 days post-surgery) |
| Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing | On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of:
| Visit 3 (Month1 post-surgery) |
| Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing | On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of:
| Visit 4 ( 3 Month post-surgery) |
| Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing | On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of:
| Visit 5 (6 Month post-surgery) |
| Proportion of subjects with a complication at the site of mucosal healing | On examination of the area of interest, during each visit, search for the presence of:
| Visit 6 (Month 12 post-surgery) |
| quality of life related to oral health | Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score | Day 0 or Day +1 post-surgery (if hospitalized patient) |
| quality of life related to oral health | Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score | Visit1 (7 to10 days post-surgery) |
| quality of life related to oral health | Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score | Visit 2 (14 to 15 days post-surgery) |
| quality of life related to oral health | Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score | V3 (Month 1 post-surgery), |
| quality of life related to oral health | Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score | Visit 4 ( Month 3 post-surgery) |
| quality of life related to oral health | Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score | Visit 5 (Month 6 post-surgery) |
| quality of life related to oral health | Oral health impact profile OHIP 14 quality of life score | Visit 6 (Month 12 post-surgery) |
| Proportion of subjects with new bone formation | Presence of newly formed bone assessed by cone-beam imaging | Visit 4 (Month 3) |
| Proportion of subjects with new bone formation | Presence of newly formed bone assessed by cone-beam imaging | Visit 5 (Month 6) |
| CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin | Not yet recruiting | Bordeaux | France |
|
| CHU de Dijon | Not yet recruiting | Dijon | France |
|
| CHR Metz Thionville | Not yet recruiting | Metz | France |
|
| CHU de Reims | Not yet recruiting | Reims | France |
|