Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To compare the in hospital clinical outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety of deferred stenting versus non-deferred stenting in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary percutaneous intervention.
Angiographically, intracoronary thrombus is defined as the presence of a filling defect with reduced contrast density or haziness. Angiographic evidence of thrombus can be seen in 91.6% of patients who present with STEMI(1). Large intracoronary thrombus has an incidence of 16.4% of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Thrombus encountered in the setting of ACS has been correlated with acute complications during percutaneous coronary interventions including: 3 times higher MACE - ischemic complications, lower procedural success, higher distal embolization leading to slow/no flow, high mortality, ST elevation and longer hospital stays.
High thrombus burden can be defined using Yip's criteria:
PCI Strategies introduced in HIGH thrombus BURDEN include incorporation of both pharmacological and mechanical thrombus removal.
Immediate stenting of the culprit coronary artery may lead to high chances of the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon that leads to periprocedural MI and adverse cardiovascular events. Current studies show that routine deferred stenting has not been found beneficial except when careful patient selection is done where deferral may reduce the final infarct size.
Glycoprotein IIa/IIIb inhibitors have been used in such cases. Current guidelines recommend GPIIa/IIb as bailout therapy following PCI when massive thrombus is found: Class IIa. (6) The rationale in using intracoronary GPIIa/IIIb is that it can be more effective, faster and safer in terms of bleeding.
Deferred stenting is a method of dealing with thigh thrombus burden in STEMI patients. This means to wait 24-48 hour and delay stenting. During this time gap, patient receives intravenous tirofiban. This may be beneficial as the thrombus burden will reduce, minimizing the occurrence of the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon.
During coronary angiography the epicardial perfusion can be demonstrated using the TIMI grade flow where:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred stenting in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI | Active Comparator |
| |
| Non-deferred stenting in STEMI patients with high thrombus burden undergoing primary PCI | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Percutaneous coronary angiography | Procedure | Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) refers to a family of minimally invasive procedures used to open clogged coronary arteries in patients presenting with myocardial infarction, through which installment of stents or intracoronary injection of drugs can take place. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness of the method used in terms of TIMI flow | By TIMI III flow finding | During in hospital stay up to 36 hours |
| Effectiveness of the method used in regards to ECG. | ECG: ST segment resolution immediately after PCI and 90 minutes after PCI | During in hospital stay up to 36 hours |
| Effectiveness of the method used in regards to development of heart failure. | Development of acute heart failure after PCI during hospital admission. | During in hospital stay up to 36 hours |
| Effectiveness of the method used in regards to mortality. | Death during hospital stay post-PCI. | During in hospital stay up to 36 hours |
| Safety of the method used in regards to bleeding. | Bleeding events will be noted and classified according to BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) bleeding score during hospital stay post-PCI | During in hospital stay up to 36 hours |
| Safety of the method used in regard to development of arrhythmia. | Development of arrhythmia post-PCI will be noted and the type of arrhythmia will be identified. | During in hospital stay up to 36 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Follow up post-PCI by trans-thoracic Echo | To estimate the ejection fraction on discharge. | During in hospital stay up to 36 hours |
| Follow up post-PCI in regards to MACE (Major adverse cardiac events) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yomna S Abdelrehim, Master student | Contact | 01157090118 | +20 | yomnashokry@yahoo.com |
| Ayman Khairy, Prof | Contact | 0109 443 8055 | +20 | aymankhairy11@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohammed Abdelghany, Prof | Assiut University | Study Director |
| Ayman Khairy, Prof | Assiut University | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17692740 | Background | Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, Vaina S, van Mieghem CA, van Domburg RT, Michalis LK, Serruys PW. Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 14;50(7):573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.059. Epub 2007 Jul 30. | |
| 19490354 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
The development of MACE: Death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization due to heart failure, recurrent PCI or CABG.
| 3 and 6 months after procedure |
| Miranda-Guardiola F, Rossi A, Serra A, Garcia B, Rumoroso JR, Iniguez A, Vaquerizo B, Triano JL, Sierra G, Bruguera J; Spanish AMIcath Registry. Angiographic quantification of thrombus in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction presenting with an occluded infarct-related artery and its relationship with results of percutaneous intervention. J Interv Cardiol. 2009 Jun;22(3):207-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00464.x. Epub 2009 Apr 14. |
| 33357638 | Background | Kumar V, Sharma AK, Kumar T, Nath RK. Large intracoronary thrombus and its management during primary PCI. Indian Heart J. 2020 Nov-Dec;72(6):508-516. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 19. |
| 12377860 | Background | Yip HK, Chen MC, Chang HW, Hang CL, Hsieh YK, Fang CY, Wu CJ. Angiographic morphologic features of infarct-related arteries and timely reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: predictors of slow-flow and no-reflow phenomenon. Chest. 2002 Oct;122(4):1322-32. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.4.1322. |
| 33897834 | Background | Pradhan A, Bhandari M, Vishwakarma P, Sethi R. Deferred Stenting for Heavy Thrombus Burden During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation MI. Eur Cardiol. 2021 Mar 30;16:e08. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2020.31. eCollection 2021 Feb. |
| 28886621 | Background | Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimsky P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393. No abstract available. |
| 3109764 | Background | Chesebro JH, Knatterud G, Roberts R, Borer J, Cohen LS, Dalen J, Dodge HT, Francis CK, Hillis D, Ludbrook P, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation. 1987 Jul;76(1):142-54. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.76.1.142. |
| 27151345 | Background | Vranckx P, White HD, Huang Z, Mahaffey KW, Armstrong PW, Van de Werf F, Moliterno DJ, Wallentin L, Held C, Aylward PE, Cornel JH, Bode C, Huber K, Nicolau JC, Ruzyllo W, Harrington RA, Tricoci P. Validation of BARC Bleeding Criteria in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: The TRACER Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 10;67(18):2135-2144. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.056. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003328 | Coronary Thrombosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D013927 | Thrombosis |
| D016769 | Embolism and Thrombosis |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided