Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Low enrollment numbers
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Microdosing induction is a novel method of starting buprenorphine/naloxone without patients experiencing the opioid withdrawal that is a part of traditional induction. Patients take small doses of buprenorphine/naloxone that increase slowly over a week. Although microdosing induction has been supported anecdotally, its effectiveness is not known. The proposed study will compare the effectiveness and safety of two induction strategies for transitioning patients from opioids to buprenorphine/naloxone. All inductions will occur in an outpatient telehealth opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment setting. The study will compare patients who receive traditional induction versus microdosing induction. Primary outcomes include effectiveness and safety. Secondary outcomes include treatment retention, self-reported use of opioids during induction, return to opioid use, opioid appearance in drug screens, craving/withdrawal symptoms, and patient satisfaction.
Medication for OUD (MOUD) is a first-line treatment for OUD and improves outcomes in mortality, retention in treatment, and non-prescribed opioid use. Buprenorphine/naloxone is the only MOUD of the three FDA-approved medications for OUD available in the telehealth setting, as methadone and injectable naltrexone must be managed in an in-person setting. Buprenorphine/naloxone, also referred to as brand name Suboxone, is administered by placing a film strip under the tongue. Buprenorphine acts as a partial agonist with a high binding affinity at the mu-opioid receptor; clearance of the pure opioid agonist must occur before a full dose of buprenorphine is administered, as buprenorphine will displace opioid agonists with lower binding affinity at the receptor and cause rapid-onset "precipitated withdrawal." During traditional induction, patients must abstain from opioids prior to starting buprenorphine/naloxone and thus endure mild-to-moderate opioid withdrawal before initiating buprenorphine (to avoid precipitated withdrawal). Barriers to traditional induction include the required withdrawal period, fear of precipitated withdrawal (particularly with increased fentanyl in the opioid supply, which is lipophilic and thus remains in the body longer after last use), and an intolerable withdrawal period (which increases the risk of a patient leaving treatment to return to non-prescribed opioid use). In addition, there are patients who are not ready to stop their opioid but are ready to start treatment.
First described in the literature as the Bernese Method in 2016, microdosing induction was developed to overcome these barriers. Microdosing induction requires the administration of small but escalating doses of buprenorphine/naloxone over a period of several days to weeks, such that the buprenorphine slowly overcomes the effect of the opioid agonist at the receptor. This technique does not require a period of withdrawal prior to starting treatment. Various microdosing induction protocols have been described primarily in inpatient settings in case reports, case series, and literature reviews. No published research studies exist that systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of microdosing induction, particularly in a telehealth setting.
Using a quasi-experimental design for evaluating MOUD induction strategies in a telehealth setting, the investigators will estimate the effect of microdosing induction on patient completion of successful induction with mild withdrawal, adjusted maximum withdrawal score, and adverse events. The investigators hypothesize that microdosing induction patients will have higher odds of completing a successful induction with mild withdrawal, lower maximum withdrawal scores, and a similar number of adverse events compared to traditional induction patients.
Study Details:
The proposed study will follow a quasi-experimental design with a comparison group to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of microdosing induction versus traditional induction of buprenorphine/naloxone in telehealth patients at Bicycle Health. Bicycle Health is a digital health company that provides biopsychosocial treatment of OUD via telehealth. With guidance from the research team, participating medical providers at Bicycle Health will recruit patients at intake who meet eligibility criteria (see Participant Population section below). Based on sample size calculations under different scenarios, and feasibility given current intake rates at Bicycle Health, the study will enroll at least 85 patients in the microdosing induction group, and at least 85 patients in the comparison group.
The study period will take place during the induction period of treatment. All enrolled patients will undergo assessment by a participating provider through a visit at days one, four, seven, and ten, which will include a modified-clinical opiate withdrawal scale (M-COWS) and a clinical interview. Day one for microdosing induction patients will be the first day they begin taking buprenorphine/naloxone. Day one for the traditional induction study arm will be the first day without opioids. Surveys will be completed by the providers during each visit. The patient will also undergo daily self-assessments for 10 days, which will include subjective opiate withdrawal scale (SOWS), presence of cravings, self-reported continued opioid use, and patient satisfaction.
After the induction period, two urine drug screens will be conducted to monitor opioid use in early treatment. Patients at Bicycle Health receive four urine drug screen cups and four fentanyl dip cards in the mail about 1 week after their first appointment. The first urine drug screen is expected to be completed when it is delivered to the patient's residence, and it will primarily be used to ensure patients are taking buprenorphine. The second urine drug screen is expected to be completed between 14-21 days after the first test is completed. This urine drug screening will be used to collect objective data on opioid use after initiation of buprenorphine. Retention in treatment will be measured at day 10 and day 30.
Primary outcomes assess effectiveness and safety:
Secondary outcomes include:
The investigators will use a multilevel logistic regression model to estimate the odds of completing a successful induction with mild withdrawal. The investigators will use a multilevel cox proportional hazards regression model for retention analysis. All models will adjust for covariates. Covariates may include age, sex, payment method, baseline M-COWS score. Additional covariates collected through patient intake form will be considered, including history of unsuccessful induction, history of precipitated withdrawal, and history of experience with buprenorphine. A difference-in-difference analysis using multilevel linear regression will be used to assess maximum M-COWS score minus baseline M-COWS score. Covariates will be adjusted for in the model. Covariates may include age, sex, payment method, baseline M-COWS score, history of unsuccessful induction, history of precipitated withdrawal, and history of experience with buprenorphine. Average and median M-COWS and SOWS will be calculated at each data collection timepoint. Adverse events will be reported as a percentage of enrolled patients who experienced an adverse event. For secondary outcomes, level of craving/withdrawal symptoms and patient satisfaction, the investigators will calculate the mean and median scores for outcomes at each measurement time point.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Induction Arm | Active Comparator | In this arm, study participants will wait until they have significant opioid withdrawal (SOWS score >=17) prior to starting buprenorphine. Participants will then started with 2 mg sublingual and escalate to a maximum of 12 mg on the first day depending on withdrawal symptoms. On day 2, the participant will take same dose as the total dose taken on day 1, and continue that dose daily until reevaluation. |
|
| Microdosing Induction Arm | Active Comparator | In this arm, study participants will not wait until they have significant opioid withdrawal. They will take 0.5 mg buprenorphine on day 1, 2 mg on day 2, 4 mg on day 3, 6 mg on day 4, 8 mg on day 5 and 12 mg starting on day 6. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| buprenorphine/naloxone | Drug | Buprenorphine/naloxone will be used to begin each patient's treatment for opioid use disorder. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants who complete induction with no/mild withdrawal | Completion of induction with no/mild withdrawal | 10 days |
| Modified-Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (M-COWS) scores | Average/median and Maximum M-COWS scores for each participant. Scores range from 0-48, with higher scores indicating more withdrawal symptoms. | 10 days |
| Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) scores | Average/median SOWS scores for each participant. Score range from 0-64, with higher scores indicating more withdrawal symptoms. | 10 days |
| Adverse outcomes | Any untoward medial occurrence | 10 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment retention | Patient attendance at visit with a participating provider on day 10 and day 30 | 30 days |
| Opioid use | Self-reported return to opioid use after buprenorphine/naloxone induction |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Scott Weiner, MD, MPH | Bicycle Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bicycle Health | Boston | Massachusetts | 02111 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27499655 | Background | Hammig R, Kemter A, Strasser J, von Bardeleben U, Gugger B, Walter M, Dursteler KM, Vogel M. Use of microdoses for induction of buprenorphine treatment with overlapping full opioid agonist use: the Bernese method. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2016 Jul 20;7:99-105. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S109919. eCollection 2016. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009293 | Opioid-Related Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000079524 | Narcotic-Related Disorders |
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069479 | Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002047 | Buprenorphine |
| D009019 | Morphinans |
| D053610 | Opiate Alkaloids |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 30 days |
| Toxicology screens | Opioid appearance in drug screens | 30 days |
| Cravings | Patient self-reported opioid-related cravings | 30 days |
| Patient satisfaction | On a scale of 1 (highly unsatisfactory) to 5 (highly satisfactory), participants will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the buprenorphine induction process. | 30 days |
| D006571 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D009270 | Naloxone |
| D006572 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-Ring |
| D006576 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D010616 | Phenanthrenes |
| D011084 | Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D004338 | Drug Combinations |
| D004364 | Pharmaceutical Preparations |