Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-001063-27 | EudraCT Number | ||
| 2024-515177-94-00 | EU Trial (CTIS) Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a 17-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, flexible-dosing, parallel-group, multicenter study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of suvecaltamide for the treatment of moderate to severe residual tremor in adult participants with Parkinson's disease (PD). The target population represents participants who have tremor that is not adequately controlled by PD medications and that interferes with their activities of daily living (ADL) and/or with their performance of tasks.
Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive suvecaltamide or placebo and stratified by the Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS) composite outcome score (≤ 17 or > 17) as assessed at baseline. The maximum total duration of the study for each participant will be 23 weeks, with a maximum treatment duration of 17 weeks. For each participant, the study consists of a Screening Period (up to 4 weeks), a 5-week Dose Titration and Optimization Period, a 12-week Maintenance Period, and a 2-week Safety Follow-up Period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants who will receive a matching placebo during the Dose Titration, Optimization Period, and Maintenance Period. |
|
| Sulvecaltamide | Experimental | Participants who will receive an optimal dose of suvecaltamide during the Dose Titration, Optimization Period, and Maintenance Period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Drug | Matching placebo capsule(s) administered every day (QD) orally. Titration may proceed at a rate of 1 matching placebo capsule per day every 7 days as required for optimal efficacy and tolerability up to a maximum number of 3 matching placebo capsules per day. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 17 on the Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS) Composite Outcome Score | The TETRAS composite outcome score is the sum of modified items 1 - 11 of the TETRAS-ADL subscale and modified items 6a, 6b, and 7 of the TETRAS-PS. The TETRAS-ADL subscale is a patient-rated scale administered by a trained interviewer that assesses the impact of tremor on day-to-day functioning, such as eating, drinking, dressing, and other fine motor skills. The TETRAS-PS is a clinical rating scale that quantifies tremor in the head, face voice, limbs and trunk. Items 6a, 6b, and 7 of the TETRAS-PS evaluate the impact of upper limb tremor on performance. Each item from the modified subscales ranges from 0 - 3, with 0 representing normal or slightly abnormal and 3 representing severely abnormal. The sum of the 14 items provides the TETRAS composite outcome score, which ranges from 0 - 42, with higher scores representing more severe tremor. The change from baseline is being reported where the greater the change from baseline indicates improvement in outcome. | Baseline to Week 17 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Improved (≥ 1-point Improvement) From Baseline to Week 17 on the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) | The CGI-S is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale assessed by qualified personnel to assess the severity of the impact of tremor in PD on the participants' ability to function. The responses to this investigator-completed scale range from 1 (no limitations) to 5 (severe), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. |
Not provided
KEY Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of clinically probable or clinically established Parkinson's disease (PD) meeting the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) 2015 criteria.
Participants must be individually optimized on PD medications for the treatment of other cardinal signs of PD (bradykinesia, rigidity) per the judgment of the investigator.
Participants must be on a stable dosing regimen of their permitted PD and/or other tremor (eg, propranolol) medications for the treatment of motor symptoms for at least 6 weeks prior to screening and do not anticipate the need to make any changes for the duration of the study. A lack of use of medications used to treat motor symptoms also must be stable for 6 weeks prior to screening and remain stable for the duration of the study.
Participants have moderate to severe impairment associated with tremor at both the screening and baseline visits, as determined by all the following:
KEY Exclusion Criteria:
Medical Conditions
Prior/Concomitant Therapy
Diagnostic Assessments
Other protocol-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jazz Study Director | Jazz Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Movement Disorders Center of Arizona | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85258 | United States | ||
| Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California (USC) |
In accordance with ICMJE requirements, Jazz Pharmaceuticals may provide qualified external researchers access to individual participant data (IPD) and clinical trial data that underlie the results of this trial upon request. Qualified researchers can submit a request on https://www.jazzpharma.com/science/clinical-trial-data-sharing/ as outlined. Jazz Pharmaceuticals reserves the right not to consider a request. For inquiries about Jazz's data sharing policy contact clinicaldatasharing@jazzpharma.com.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 169 participants who met all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were enrolled and randomized to treatment at 43 sites in the United States, Germany, Poland, and Spain.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Sulvecaltamide | Participants who received an optimal dose of suvecaltamide during the Dose Titration, Optimization Period, and Maintenance Period. |
| FG001 | Placebo | Participants who received a matching placebo during the Dose Titration, Optimization Period, and Maintenance Period. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 31, 2023 | Oct 16, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Suvecaltamide | Drug | Suvecaltamide capsule administered every day (QD) orally. Titration may proceed at a rate of 10 mg suvecaltamide per day every 7 days as required for optimal efficacy and tolerability up to a maximum dose of 30 mg suvecaltamide per day. |
|
|
| Baseline to Week 17 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 17 on The Essential Tremor Rating Scale, Activities of Daily Living Subscale (TETRAS-ADL) | The TETRAS-ADL subscale is a patient-rated scale of the impact of tremor on day-to-day functioning administered by a trained interviewer. This subscale directly measures how a patient functions by assessing activities impacted by tremor, such as eating and drinking, dressing and personal hygiene, carrying items, and fine motor skills. The TETRAS-ADL is the sum of 12 items and are rated on a 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) scale. The maximum total score is 48. Higher scores represent more severe tremor. The change from baseline is reported where the greater the change from baseline indicates improvement in outcome. | Baseline to Week 17 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Improved (≥ 1 Point) From Baseline to Week 17 on the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) | The PGI-S is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale, with response options ranging from 1 (no limitations) to 5 (severe), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The participant will rate his/her impression of the severity of the impact of their tremor in PD on their current ability to function. | Baseline to Week 17 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Were Much Improved on the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 17 | The PGI-C is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale that participants use to rate the change in severity of their ability to function due to tremor since baseline. The responses to this scale range from 1 (Much improved) to 5 (Much worse), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. | Baseline to Week 17 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Were Much Improved on the Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Week 17 | The CGI-C is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale that a qualified medical personnel will use to rate the change in severity of the participants' ability to function due to their tremor since baseline. The responses to this scale range from 1 (Much improved) to 5 (Much worse), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. | Baseline to Week 17 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 17 on The Essential Tremor Rating Scale, Performance Subscale (TETRAS-PS) | The TETRAS-PS is a clinical rating scale performed by a blinded rater that quantifies tremor in the head, face, voice, limbs, and trunk. Each item will be rated on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). The sum of the individual scores provides the overall score, ranging from 0 to 64, with higher scores representing more severe tremor. The change from baseline is being reported with the greater change indicating improvement in outcome. | Baseline to Week 17 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 17 on TETRAS Total Score (TETRAS-ADL + TETRAS-PS) | The TETRAS total score is the sum of the scores of the full TETRAS-ADL and TETRAS-PS subscales. Each item is rated on a 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) scale, and total scores range from 0 to 112, with higher scores representing more severe tremor. The TETRAS-PS is performed by a blinded rater. The change from baseline is being reported with the greater change indicating an improvement in clinical outcome. | Baseline to Week 17 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 17 on the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Tremor Score | The MDS-UPDRS tremor score is the sum of selected items from MDS-UPDRS questionnaire Part II (Item 2.10) and 10 items from Part III (Items 3.15a,b, 3.16a,b, 3.17a-e, and 3.18). Item 2.10 assesses the patient report of the presence of tremor and impact on daily activities. Items 3.15, 3.16, and 3.17 are clinician assessments of the amplitude of distinct types of tremor (resting, postural, and kinetic respectively)in the right and left upper extremities separately. Item 3.17 also includes separate clinician assessments for both lower extremities and for the lip/jaw. Item 3.18 provides a clinician assessment of the constancy of rest tremor without regard to anatomical location. The rating for each item ranges from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) with a maximum possible total MDS-UPDRS tremor score of 44. Higher scores indicate more severe clinical outcome. The change from baseline is being reported with the greater change indicating an improvement in clinical outcome. | Baseline to Week 17 |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90033 |
| United States |
| University of Colorado Hospital Anschutz Outpatient Pavilion | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
| Neurology of Central Florida Research Center LLC | Altamonte Springs | Florida | 32714 | United States |
| Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Center of Boca Raton | Boca Raton | Florida | 33486 | United States |
| Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc. | Jacksonville | Florida | 32256 | United States |
| USF Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center | Tampa | Florida | 33613 | United States |
| NeuroTrials Research Inc. | Atlanta | Georgia | 30328 | United States |
| Hawaii Pacific Health | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96817 | United States |
| Northwestern Medical Group, Department of Neurology | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| University of Kansas Medical Center | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Department of Neurology | Lexington | Kentucky | 40536 | United States |
| The Nene and Jamie Koch Comprehensive Movement Disorders Center | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87106 | United States |
| Albany Medical College | Albany | New York | 12208 | United States |
| Dent Neurologic Institute | Amherst | New York | 14226 | United States |
| Columbia University Irving Medical Center | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| South Shore Neurologic Associates PC | Patchogue | New York | 11772 | United States |
| University of Cincinnati Gardner Neuroscience Institute (UCGNI) | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37232 | United States |
| Central Texas Neurology Consultants | Round Rock | Texas | 78681 | United States |
| EverGreenHealth Neuroscience Institute | Kirkland | Washington | 98034 | United States |
| Zentrum f. klinische Forschung Dr. I. Schöll | Bad Homburg | 61350 | Germany |
| Pharmakologisches Studienzentrum Chemnitz GmbH | Chemnitz | 091111 | Germany |
| Curiositas-ad-sanum Beratungs-und Studien GmbH | Haag in Oberbayern | 83527 | Germany |
| Deutsche Klinik fur Diagnostik Helios Klinik Wiesbaden | Hessen | 65191 | Germany |
| Velocity Clinical Research Germany GmbH, Location Wiesbaden | Wiesbaden | 65189 | Germany |
| Neurologia Slaska Centrum Medyczne | Katowice | 40-689 | Poland |
| Centrum Medyczne Plejady | Krakow | 30-363 | Poland |
| Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Neuromed M.i M. Nastaj Spólka Partnerska | Lublin | 20-064 | Poland |
| Maxxmed Centrum Zdrowia i Urody w Lublinie | Lublin | 20-080 | Poland |
| Gabinety Lekarskie Rivermed Sp. z o.o. | Poznan | 61-441 | Poland |
| ETG Neuroscience Sp. z o.o. | Warsaw | 02-777 | Poland |
| Hospital Universitario Cruces | Barakaldo | 48903 | Spain |
| Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau | Barcelona | 08041 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario de La Princesa | Madrid | 28006 | Spain |
| Hospital Ramón y Cajal | Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena | Seville | 41009 | Spain |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Baseline characteristics were assessed in the Safety Analysis Set.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Sulvecaltamide | Participants who received an optimal dose of suvecaltamide during the Dose Titration, Optimization Period, and Maintenance Period. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants who received a matching placebo during the Dose Titration, Optimization Period, and Maintenance Period. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 17 on the Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS) Composite Outcome Score | The TETRAS composite outcome score is the sum of modified items 1 - 11 of the TETRAS-ADL subscale and modified items 6a, 6b, and 7 of the TETRAS-PS. The TETRAS-ADL subscale is a patient-rated scale administered by a trained interviewer that assesses the impact of tremor on day-to-day functioning, such as eating, drinking, dressing, and other fine motor skills. The TETRAS-PS is a clinical rating scale that quantifies tremor in the head, face voice, limbs and trunk. Items 6a, 6b, and 7 of the TETRAS-PS evaluate the impact of upper limb tremor on performance. Each item from the modified subscales ranges from 0 - 3, with 0 representing normal or slightly abnormal and 3 representing severely abnormal. The sum of the 14 items provides the TETRAS composite outcome score, which ranges from 0 - 42, with higher scores representing more severe tremor. The change from baseline is being reported where the greater the change from baseline indicates improvement in outcome. | Mean TETRAS composite outcome score was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline to Week 17 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Improved (≥ 1-point Improvement) From Baseline to Week 17 on the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) | The CGI-S is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale assessed by qualified personnel to assess the severity of the impact of tremor in PD on the participants' ability to function. The responses to this investigator-completed scale range from 1 (no limitations) to 5 (severe), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. | CGI-S was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline to Week 17 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 17 on The Essential Tremor Rating Scale, Activities of Daily Living Subscale (TETRAS-ADL) | The TETRAS-ADL subscale is a patient-rated scale of the impact of tremor on day-to-day functioning administered by a trained interviewer. This subscale directly measures how a patient functions by assessing activities impacted by tremor, such as eating and drinking, dressing and personal hygiene, carrying items, and fine motor skills. The TETRAS-ADL is the sum of 12 items and are rated on a 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) scale. The maximum total score is 48. Higher scores represent more severe tremor. The change from baseline is reported where the greater the change from baseline indicates improvement in outcome. | TETRAS-ADL was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on scale | Baseline to Week 17 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Improved (≥ 1 Point) From Baseline to Week 17 on the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) | The PGI-S is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale, with response options ranging from 1 (no limitations) to 5 (severe), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The participant will rate his/her impression of the severity of the impact of their tremor in PD on their current ability to function. | PGI-S was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | Baseline to Week 17 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Were Much Improved on the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 17 | The PGI-C is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale that participants use to rate the change in severity of their ability to function due to tremor since baseline. The responses to this scale range from 1 (Much improved) to 5 (Much worse), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. | PGI-C was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | Baseline to Week 17 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Were Much Improved on the Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Week 17 | The CGI-C is a 5-point Likert-type rating scale that a qualified medical personnel will use to rate the change in severity of the participants' ability to function due to their tremor since baseline. The responses to this scale range from 1 (Much improved) to 5 (Much worse), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. | CGI-C was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | Baseline to Week 17 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 17 on The Essential Tremor Rating Scale, Performance Subscale (TETRAS-PS) | The TETRAS-PS is a clinical rating scale performed by a blinded rater that quantifies tremor in the head, face, voice, limbs, and trunk. Each item will be rated on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). The sum of the individual scores provides the overall score, ranging from 0 to 64, with higher scores representing more severe tremor. The change from baseline is being reported with the greater change indicating improvement in outcome. | TETRAS-PS was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline to Week 17 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 17 on TETRAS Total Score (TETRAS-ADL + TETRAS-PS) | The TETRAS total score is the sum of the scores of the full TETRAS-ADL and TETRAS-PS subscales. Each item is rated on a 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) scale, and total scores range from 0 to 112, with higher scores representing more severe tremor. The TETRAS-PS is performed by a blinded rater. The change from baseline is being reported with the greater change indicating an improvement in clinical outcome. | TETRAS total score was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline to Week 17 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 17 on the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Tremor Score | The MDS-UPDRS tremor score is the sum of selected items from MDS-UPDRS questionnaire Part II (Item 2.10) and 10 items from Part III (Items 3.15a,b, 3.16a,b, 3.17a-e, and 3.18). Item 2.10 assesses the patient report of the presence of tremor and impact on daily activities. Items 3.15, 3.16, and 3.17 are clinician assessments of the amplitude of distinct types of tremor (resting, postural, and kinetic respectively)in the right and left upper extremities separately. Item 3.17 also includes separate clinician assessments for both lower extremities and for the lip/jaw. Item 3.18 provides a clinician assessment of the constancy of rest tremor without regard to anatomical location. The rating for each item ranges from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe) with a maximum possible total MDS-UPDRS tremor score of 44. Higher scores indicate more severe clinical outcome. The change from baseline is being reported with the greater change indicating an improvement in clinical outcome. | MDS-UPDRS was assessed in participants with available data in the Full Analysis Set. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline to Week 17 |
|
Adverse events were collected from baseline up to 14 days after the last dose of study intervention. up to 19 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Sulvecaltamide | Participants who received an optimal dose of suvecaltamide during the Dose Titration, Optimization Period, and Maintenance Period. | 0 | 83 | 4 | 83 | 36 | 83 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Participants who received a matching placebo during the Dose Titration, Optimization Period, and Maintenance Period. | 0 | 86 | 2 | 86 | 19 | 86 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microcytic anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice cholestatic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lumbar vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA27 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director Clinical Trial Disclosure & Transparency | Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +1 215-832-3750 | ClinicalTrialDisclosure@JazzPharma.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 22, 2024 | Oct 15, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010300 | Parkinson Disease |
| D014202 | Tremor |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020734 | Parkinsonian Disorders |
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D000080874 | Synucleinopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D020820 | Dyskinesias |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|