Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Pittsburgh | OTHER |
| Hospital Universitario del Valle Evaristo Garcia | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate among trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock the clinical impact of hemostatic resuscitation between whole blood vs. blood components therapy in the following outcomes in a hierarchical analysis: mortality at 28 days and evolution of organ dysfunction.
Background: Hemostatic resuscitation is a mainstay in the management of trauma patients. Factors such as blood loss and tissue injury contribute to coagulation and hemodynamic status imbalances. Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in trauma patients, despite advances in strategies such as damage control surgery, massive transfusion protocol, and intensive care.
Conventional therapy for hemostatic resuscitation is a blood transfusion seeking a 1:1:1 ratio of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets. However, this ratio has disadvantages in clinical practice, especially in low-resource settings. Whole blood transfusion can contribute to maintaining a physiological rate of cells, clotting factors, and hemostatic properties. Advances in the whole blood elucidated a new opportunity for its implementation in civilian trauma centers. However, the effect of initial resuscitation with whole blood in trauma patients is unclear. This study aims to determine the effect of hemostatic resuscitation using whole blood on mortality and evolution of organ dysfunction in severe trauma patients compared to blood components therapy. This clinical trial attempts to resolve the debate and uncertainty of using whole blood vs. blood components.
Study Design: An open-label, randomized, prospective, single-center and controlled trial will be performed. This study will be included prospectively randomized severe trauma patients who require a blood transfusion. Randomization can assign participants to the experimental arm, transfusing them with 3 units of whole blood. If the participant continues requiring transfusions, the second intervention of 3 units of whole blood can be administered. On the contrary, the randomization can assign to the control arm, where the participant will receive 3 red blood cell units, 3 fresh frozen plasma units, and half of a platelets apheresis, equivalent to 3 platelets units. If required, a second intervention with the same ratio can be transfused to participants.
The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite outcome based on mortality at 28 days and the evolution of organ dysfunction. Organ dysfunction will be measured as the difference in the score between the fifth and first days of the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment). Secondary outcomes are mortality, coagulopathy profile, intensive care unit free days, length of hospital stay free days, and volumes of transfusion requirements. Safety outcomes are complications related to transfusion (anaphylaxis, acute hemolytic reaction, acute lung injury) and complications related to trauma patients (acute distress respiratory syndrome, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury with or without dialysis, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, sepsis, abdominal complications, abdominal compartment syndrome)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Blood | Experimental | Leukoreduced whole blood with a platelet-sparing filter. Participants will be transfused with 3 whole blood units. If the participant requires, an additional transfusion pack composite by 3 whole blood units will be administered. |
|
| Blood Components Therapy | Active Comparator | 1:1:1 ratio of red blood cells unit, plasma unit, and platelets unit. Participants will be transfused with 3 red blood cell units, 3 fresh frozen plasma units, and 3 platelets units. A second intervention with the same ratio can be transfused to participants if they require it. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfusion of blood products | Biological | The intervention will be either a) administration of 6 units of whole blood or b) administration of blood component therapy in the proportion of 6:6:6 units of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The primary outcome is a hierarchical outcome consisting of mortality at 28 days post-randomization and evolution of organ dysfunction (difference of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between day 1 and day 5 post-randomization). | The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite outcome that will be analyzed using the Win-Ratio test. The first level will be 28-day mortality. The "winner" will be the participant who survival; in case of a tie, the second level will be the difference in SOFA score between fifth and first day. The "winner" will be participant with the lowest difference. | 28 days post ED admission |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 24-hour mortality | The occurrence of deaths in the first 24 hours post-ED admission and we will document and record the time of death in hours. | First 24 hours post ED admission. |
| In-hospital mortality |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto F Garcia, MD MSc | Contact | +576023319090 | 4299 | alberto.garcia@fvl.org.co |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alberto F Garcia, MD MSc | Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili | Principal Investigator |
| Carlos A Ordoñez, MD | Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili | Recruiting | Cali | Valle del Cauca Department | Colombia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40087111 | Derived | Garcia AF, Caicedo Y, Gempeler A, Vallecilla L, Macia C, Orlas C, Fernandez MI, Lancheros-Ramirez P, Quintero M, Hernandez E, Vargas S, Cardenas-Perez L, Ariza F, Zarama V, Carvajal S, Billefals E, Sanchez A, Badiel M, Rosso F, Granados M, Albornoz LA, Puyana JC, Ospina-Tascon G, Ordonez CA. Transfusion of modified whole blood versus blood components therapy in patients with severe trauma: Randomized controlled trial protocol (WEBSTER trial). Injury. 2025 May;56(5):112173. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112173. Epub 2025 Jan 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D000081084 | Accidental Injuries |
| D009104 | Multiple Trauma |
| D006470 | Hemorrhage |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001803 | Blood Transfusion |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001691 | Biological Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Single center, Controlled, Randomized, and Open label therapeutic trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The occurrence of deaths during the hospital stays post-ED admission, and we will document and record the time of death in days.
| 28 days post ED admission |
| Multiple organ dysfunction incidence | Multiple organ dysfunction is a score ≥ 3 in two or more systems evaluated by SOFA score. | 1-day / 3-day / 5-day / 7-day post-ED admission |
| Evolution of Coagulopathy | We will evaluate the values of INR, fibrinogen, and MA-TEG during the admission and the first 24 hours post-ED admission. | Admission - 3 hours - 6 hours - 24 hours post-ED admission |
| Intensive care unit-free days | ICU-free days | 28-days post-ED admission |
| Hospital length stay-free days | Hospital length stay-free days | 28-days post-ED admission |
| Blood transfusion requirements during the first 24 hours | The number of units of whole blood or blood components transfused. Comparisons will be according to the following references:
| Time frame 3 hours / 6 hours / 12 hours / 24 hours |
| Proportion of participants with transfusional adverse reactions | We will document transfusional adverse reactions such as acute hemolytic reaction, anaphylaxis, non-hemolytic febrile transfusion reaction, allergy, and potassium and calcium electrolyte disorders. | 28-days post-ED admission |
| Proportion of participants with adverse reactions | We will document adverse reactions such as acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury with or without dialysis, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, sepsis, abdominal complications, and abdominal compartment syndrome | 28-days post-ED admission |