Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| H0P-MC-OA05 | Other Identifier | Eli Lilly and Company |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LY3857210 in participants with Osteoarthritic Pain. This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol, H0P-MC-CPMP (NCT05986292), which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45 mg LY3857210 | Experimental | Participants received 45 milligram (mg) LY3857210 orally once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received placebo orally once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LY3857210 | Drug | Administered orally |
| |
| Placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline for Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95 percent (%) credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC®) Pain Subscale | The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 5 questions on the pain subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no pain, and 4 = extreme pain. The scores for the pain subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the 5 questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 20 with higher scores representing worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST) | Eli Lilly and Company | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | Chandler | Arizona | 85224 | United States | ||
| Arizona Research Center |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| A Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3857210 In Participants With Osteoarthritis Pain (OA05) | View source |
Not provided
Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.
Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and European Union (EU), whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.
A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | 45 mg LY3857210 | Participants received 45 milligram (mg) LY3857210 orally once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| FG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo orally once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Oct 14, 2022 | May 27, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
Administered orally |
|
| Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Stiffness Subscale | The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 2 questions in the stiffness subscale and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no stiffness, and 4 = extreme stiffness. The scores for the stiffness subscale was calculated by summing the scores of the 2 questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 8 with higher scores representing worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Physical Function Subscale | The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 17 questions in the physical function subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no difficulty, and 4 = extreme difficulty. The score for physical function subscale was calculated by summing the scores of the 17 questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 68 with higher scores representing worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline in Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change | Patient's global impression of change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1 = very much better, and 7 = very much worse. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0 = no pain, and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain | VAS was a graphic, single-item scale where participants were asked to describe their pain intensity over the past week, on a scale of 0 to 100: 0 = no pain, and 100 = worst imaginable pain. Participants completed the VAS by placing a line perpendicular to the VAS line at a point that described their pain intensity. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline on the Sleep Scale From the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS Sleep Scale) - Average Hours of Sleep | The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 questions addressing the past week. Question 1 asks time to fall asleep and it is reported in 5-point timeframe categories. Question 2 asks average hours of sleep. In the remaining 10 questions participants report how often a sleep symptom or problem was present on a scale ranging from '0=all of the time' to '5=none of the time.' MOS Sleep scale dimension scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicating improvement, except for the dimension of sleep adequacy, where higher scores indicate improvement. Here, the average hours of sleep (i.e., Question 2) is reported as the average number of hours slept each night during the past week (range 0 to 24 hours). Higher number of hours slept indicates improvement. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Total Amount of Rescue Medication Use as Measured by Average Daily Dosage | Total amount of rescue medication use as measured by average daily dosage. Posterior mean and 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline on the EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (5D) Five Level (5L) Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Index (United States Algorithm) | The EQ-5D-5L assessed quality of life based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participant was asked to 'check the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY,' choosing from 5 options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems) provided under each dimension. The scores in the 5 dimensions were summarized into a health state index score using the United States algorithm. The health state index value is a single value on a scale from less than 0 to 1 (negative values are valued as worse than dead) with higher scores indicating better health: 0=a health state equivalent to death, and 1=perfect health. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible intervals was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Phoenix |
| Arizona |
| 85053 |
| United States |
| Artemis Institute for Clinical Research | Riverside | California | 92503 | United States |
| Artemis Institute for Clinical Research | San Diego | California | 92103 | United States |
| CMR of Greater New Haven, LLC | Hamden | Connecticut | 06517 | United States |
| Accel Research Sites- Clinical Research Unit | DeLand | Florida | 32720 | United States |
| Suncoast Research Group | Miami | Florida | 33135 | United States |
| University of Miami | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| New Horizon Research Center | Miami | Florida | 33165 | United States |
| Renstar Medical Research | Ocala | Florida | 34470 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc - Orlando | Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | Pinellas Park | Florida | 33781 | United States |
| North Georgia Clinical Research | Woodstock | Georgia | 30189 | United States |
| Rocky Mountain Clinical Research | Idaho Falls | Idaho | 83404 | United States |
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Boston Clinical Trials | Boston | Massachusetts | 02131 | United States |
| ActivMed Practices and Research | Methuen | Massachusetts | 01844 | United States |
| MedVadis Research Corporation | Waltham | Massachusetts | 02451 | United States |
| Great Lakes Research Group, Inc. | Bay City | Michigan | 48706 | United States |
| StudyMetrix Research | City of Saint Peters | Missouri | 63303 | United States |
| Clinvest Research LLC | Springfield | Missouri | 65807 | United States |
| Lillestol Research | Fargo | North Dakota | 58104 | United States |
| META Medical Research Institute | Dayton | Ohio | 45432 | United States |
| Altoona Center For Clinical Research | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | 16635 | United States |
| FutureSearch Trials of Neurology | Austin | Texas | 78731 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Northwest Clinical Research Center | Bellevue | Washington | 98007 | United States |
| Rainier Clinical Research Center | Renton | Washington | 98057 | United States |
| Ponce Medical School Foundation Inc. | Ponce | 00716 | Puerto Rico |
| Latin Clinical Trial Center | San Juan | 00909 | Puerto Rico |
| Received at Least One Dose of Study Drug |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
All enrolled participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | 45 mg LY3857210 | Participants received 45 mg LY3857210 orally once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo orally once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0 = no pain, and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. | All enrolled participants with non-missing baseline NRS data. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline for Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95 percent (%) credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC®) Pain Subscale | The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 5 questions on the pain subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no pain, and 4 = extreme pain. The scores for the pain subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the 5 questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 20 with higher scores representing worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Stiffness Subscale | The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 2 questions in the stiffness subscale and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no stiffness, and 4 = extreme stiffness. The scores for the stiffness subscale was calculated by summing the scores of the 2 questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 8 with higher scores representing worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Physical Function Subscale | The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 17 questions in the physical function subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no difficulty, and 4 = extreme difficulty. The score for physical function subscale was calculated by summing the scores of the 17 questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 68 with higher scores representing worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change | Patient's global impression of change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1 = very much better, and 7 = very much worse. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0 = no pain, and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain | VAS was a graphic, single-item scale where participants were asked to describe their pain intensity over the past week, on a scale of 0 to 100: 0 = no pain, and 100 = worst imaginable pain. Participants completed the VAS by placing a line perpendicular to the VAS line at a point that described their pain intensity. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Sleep Scale From the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS Sleep Scale) - Average Hours of Sleep | The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 questions addressing the past week. Question 1 asks time to fall asleep and it is reported in 5-point timeframe categories. Question 2 asks average hours of sleep. In the remaining 10 questions participants report how often a sleep symptom or problem was present on a scale ranging from '0=all of the time' to '5=none of the time.' MOS Sleep scale dimension scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicating improvement, except for the dimension of sleep adequacy, where higher scores indicate improvement. Here, the average hours of sleep (i.e., Question 2) is reported as the average number of hours slept each night during the past week (range 0 to 24 hours). Higher number of hours slept indicates improvement. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Hours per night | Baseline, Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Total Amount of Rescue Medication Use as Measured by Average Daily Dosage | Total amount of rescue medication use as measured by average daily dosage. Posterior mean and 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | milligram per day | Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (5D) Five Level (5L) Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Index (United States Algorithm) | The EQ-5D-5L assessed quality of life based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participant was asked to 'check the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY,' choosing from 5 options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems) provided under each dimension. The scores in the 5 dimensions were summarized into a health state index score using the United States algorithm. The health state index value is a single value on a scale from less than 0 to 1 (negative values are valued as worse than dead) with higher scores indicating better health: 0=a health state equivalent to death, and 1=perfect health. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible intervals was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
Baseline through Week 8
All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | 45 mg LY3857210 | Participants received 45 mg LY3857210 orally once daily for up to 8 weeks. | 0 | 98 | 0 | 98 | 9 | 98 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo orally once daily for up to 8 weeks. | 0 | 48 | 1 | 48 | 3 | 48 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tooth abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Medical Officer | Eli Lilly and Company | 08005455979 | ClinicalTrials.gov@lilly.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 27, 2023 | May 27, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants received placebo orally once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
|
|