Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) distraction in patients undergoing interventional pain procedures in the prone position. VR has been shown to improve patient experience during interventional pain procedures, however, many of these procedures are done in the prone position making VR a challenge. This study will evaluate the effect of a VR headset and support in patients undergoing prone interventional pain procedures compared to control.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality | Experimental | Patients undergo prone pain procedure with virtual reality distraction |
|
| Control | No Intervention | Patients undergo prone pain procedure without virtual reality distraction |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality Headset | Other | Patient uses a virtual reality headset and support during prone pain procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Anxiety Score | State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Self-reported anxiety instrument containing two separate 2-item subscales that measure trait (baseline) and state (situational) anxiety; Total range 20 to 80 with higher scores indicating greater anxiety). | Immediately before procedure |
| Anxiety Score | State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Self-reported anxiety instrument containing two separate 2-item subscales that measure trait (baseline) and state (situational) anxiety; Total range 20 to 80 with higher scores indicating greater anxiety). | Immediately after procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Anxiety Score | Anxiety score on an 11-point numerical rating scale (Total range 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater pain) | Immediately before procedure, during procedure, and immediately after procedure |
| Pain Score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Jung, MD MBA | University of California, Davis | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Davis Interventional Pain Clinic | Sacramento | California | 95817 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomized controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pain score on an 11-point numerical rating scale (Total range 0-10 with higher scores indicating greater pain)
| Immediately before procedure, during procedure, and immediately after procedure |
| Global Impression of Change | Global Impression of Change on a 7-point scale (Lower scores indicating decline in clinical status, and higher scores indicating improvement in clinical status) | Immediately after procedure |
| Patient Experience Satisfaction | Experience Satisfaction on an 11-point scale (Total range 0-10 with higher scores indicating higher patient experience satisfaction) | Immediately after procedure |
| Sedation Requirements | Amount of benzodiazepines and opioid medications given | During course of procedure |