Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R44MH126836 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Loss of grant funding.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
| Curebase Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Meru Health Inc. seeks to further validate the Meru Health Program (MHP) as a single solution to screening, referral, and treatment in primary care as compared to treatment as usual using a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) study design. The goal of this study is to determine the feasibility, effectiveness, and implementability of this digital mental health (DMH) solution.
If proven effective and implementable, more widely integrating the MHP into primary care has the potential to improve the systems of screening, referral, and treatment for depression nationwide. This, in turn, will serve as a solution to improve access to effective care for the millions of Americans currently suffering from depression, ultimately reducing its public health burden.
The goal of this study is to test the MHP as a 'package solution' of screening and treatment in a primary care setting through a 2-step clinical trial process: (1) A smaller proof-of-concept (POC) trial to provide guidance and establish the settings and assessments for (2) A larger confirmatory type 1 hybrid effectiveness Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) followed by the collection of potential facilitators and barriers to the treatment's wide scale implementation.
The POC study is aimed to develop all of the study materials for the RCT, and test the screening, referral, and study enrollment procedures. 30 participants will be recruited from 1 primary care clinic. The first 15 eligible participants will be referred to TAU, while the second 15 eligible participants will be referred to the MHP. Study assessments will be performed at the baseline (prior to treatment), 6-week, and 12- week (EOT) time points. In addition, at the end of the 12- week study period, we will interview the participants and providers about their experiences with the study to inform the eventual trial. Feedback will be incorporated into improved study methods.
The 300 participant RCT will be used to demonstrate long lasting and significant improvements of the MHP on participants, measured by a set of assessments completed 6 times for each enrolled participant. Study assessments will be performed at the baseline (prior to treatment), 6-, and 12 weeks (EOT) after baseline, as well as 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up time points. Using a stepped-wedge randomization study design, 150 participants will be assigned to MHP and 150 to TAU. Participants with a screening PHQ-9 of 10+ will be randomly assigned to MHP or TAU. For TAU participants, primary care providers will not be directed on how to manage the case, while participants in the MHP group will be scheduled into groups of 10-15 individuals who will work through the program together. Participants will receive the Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-B) device and be directed to download and follow the MHP app which prompts daily practices and chat communication. Study assessments for both groups will be administered online with response as the primary outcome.
Lastly will be a multistakeholder process evaluation of the delivery of the MHP intervention. Data collected from the 300 RCT participants, as well as administrators and providers from the 8 primary care clinics, will be evaluated for completion rates, engagement metrics, and satisfaction using multiple factors. We will then evaluate the program through surveys and interviews and examine patterns of mental health treatment utilization during the 12-week period, intervention fidelity and competence, attitudes, competencies, and barriers and facilitators of implementation of the MHP.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meru Health Program | Experimental | This group of participants will receive the app-based 12-Week Meru Health Program as their study intervention. |
|
| Treatment as Usual | Active Comparator | This group of participants will receive "Treatment as Usual" mental health services under the direction and referral of their Primary Care Physician. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meru Health Program | Behavioral | The Meru Health Program is a 12-week, evidence-based, smartphone-delivered, therapist-supported digital mental health intervention with as-needed psychiatrist oversight. Enrolled participants work through the program with a cohort of peers similarly affected by depression, with whom they can engage in confidential, anonymous, voluntary group chats overseen by a licensed clinical therapist. The MHP incorporates a continuous care model including daily interaction with a dedicated clinician, several evidence-based treatment components such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), behavioral activation therapy, and mindfulness meditation (MM), as well as promising newer types of depression treatments such as HRVB, nutritional psychiatry, and sleep training. Practices are introduced to weekly topics via video lessons that are reinforced via CBT practices, meditations, and biofeedback sessions and therapist messaging. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores | This 9-item Questionnaire is to measure levels of depression and is scored from 0-27. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. | Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scores | This 7-item Questionnaire is to measure levels of anxiety and is scored from 0-21. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. | Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-up |
| Change in EUROHIS- Quality of Life-8 scores |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nicholas C Peiper, PhD, MPH | Meru Health: Director of Research | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online Digital Mental Health Clinic | Denver | Colorado | 80014 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003863 | Depression |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D000092862 | Psychological Well-Being |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Treatment as Usual | Behavioral | Treatment as Usual in this study will include all of the regular standards of care for mental health needs. These standards of care may include, but are not limited to psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, or complementary therapy. |
|
This 8-item Quality of Life measurement tool is scored from 5-40. Higher scores indicate a higher satisfaction with life. |
| Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-up |
| Change in PROMIS: Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions and Emotions scores | This 4-item Questionnaire is used to measure management of stress and emotions. It is scored from 0-20 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. | Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-up |
| Change in PROMIS: Sleep Disturbance scores | This 4-item Questionnaire is used to address sleep quality. It is scored from 0-20 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. | Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-up |
| Change in PROMIS: Sleep-Related Impairment scores | This 4-item Questionnaire is used to address how sleepy a person is during the day and how it affects productivity. It is scored from 0-20 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. | Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-up |
| Change in Brief Resilience Scale scores | This 6-item Questionnaire is used to measure resilience. It is scored from 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater levels of resilience. | Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-up |
| Change in Worker Productivity and Activity Impairment responses | This qualitative questionnaire is used to assess presenteeism, absenteeism, overall worker productivity, and activity impairment. Responses will be analyzed over time to study the employment status, time missed or spent at work, and the impact of health-related issues. | Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-up |
| Change in Single Item Burnout responses | This 1-item Questionnaire is used to measure levels of work-related burnout. The responses to this single item will be analyzed over time to study changes in the severity of worker burnout. | Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, 1 Month Follow-up, 3 Month Follow-up, 6 Month Follow-up, 1 Year Follow-up |
| System Usability Scale | This 10-item scale that has been validated as a measure of acceptability and satisfaction with digital interventions. It is scored from 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher user satisfaction. | Week 12 |