Sevoflurane is a volatile agent easy to control thanks to the Minimum Alveolar Concentration (MAC) allowing its titration for an optimal depth of anesthesia. Growing biomedical evidence also highlight its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects protecting against ischemia-reperfusion injury in cardiac surgery and, potentially, in organ transplant. The estimated annual contribution of inhalational anesthetic agents represents about 0.01% of global CO2 production. Alternatives such as total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) avoid direct greenhouse emission, but their indirect carbon footprint remains a major problem. For all these reasons, this research aim to find a way to maintain the use of sevoflurane for its clinical benefits while reducing its consumption to limit the environmental consequences. The use of dexmedetomidine could help anesthesiologists to achieve this greener sevoflurane anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is a potent, highly selective α-2 adrenergic receptor agonist described as a unique sedative with analgesic and sympatholytic properties. This new randomized controlled trial (RCT) will answer the question whether a single bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.6 mcg.kg-1 on 10 minutes during induction) compared to placebo has a clinically significant impact on sevoflurane consumption during laparoscopic elective surgery.

Inhaled gases have been used since the advent of anesthesia due to their analgesic and dissociative properties. However, these are now part of a growing environmental debate which leads us to reconsider their systematic use for general anesthesia. Sevoflurane is a volatile agent easy to monitor using the Minimal Alveolar Concentration (MAC) facilitating its titration for adequate anesthesia depth. Growing biomedical evidence also highlight its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects protecting against ischemia-reperfusion injury in cardiac surgery and, potentially, in organ transplant.

The estimated annual contribution of inhalational anesthetic agents represents about 0.01% of global CO2 production. This data can be illustrated as a commercial airliner flying 418 times around the world. Desflurane is gradually abandoned as its greenhouse effect is 25 times more potent than sevoflurane for an equivalent MAC and fresh gas flow. As low-flow inhalational techniques and scavenging technologies become the standard of practice, anesthesiologists still cannot prevent the gas to be released in the atmosphere .

Alternatives such as total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) avoid direct greenhouse emission, but their indirect carbon footprint remains a major problem. Propofol has a high potential for bioaccumulation. It has high mobility in soil, resists degradation in aquatic environment and concentrates in adipose tissue of aquatic organism. To control its toxicity, destruction should be done by incineration over 1000°C. Unfortunately, studies prove that 32-49% of dispensed propofol is waisted and is mostly disposed unproperly.

For all these reasons, this research aim to find a way to maintain the use of sevoflurane for its clinical benefits while reducing its consumption to limit the environmental consequences.

The use of dexmedetomidine could help us achieve this greener sevoflurane anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine is a potent, highly selective α-2 adrenergic receptor agonist described as a unique sedative with analgesic and sympatholytic properties. Currently approved for sedation, this molecule shows many advantages compared to hypnotic drugs such as propofol. Although still under investigation, dexmedetomidine would possibly have a lower hazard environmental score. The use of dexmedetomidine also shows promising results regarding the reduction of emergence cough and agitation. Decrease in pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are other benefits of dexmedetomidine providing conditions to promote enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

Many investigations have studied impacts of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to general anesthesia for its opioid sparing capacity, and hemodynamics response during laparoscopic surgeries. Fewer research specifically wondered about sevoflurane dispense outcome. Moreover, they don't reflect the anesthesia practice of North America and their sample sizes are low.

This new randomized controlled trial (RCT) will answer the question whether a single bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.6 mcg.kg-1 on 10 minutes during induction) compared to placebo has a clinically significant impact on sevoflurane consumption during laparoscopic elective surgery. Opioid requirement, need for vasopressors, post-operative events (PONV, shivering, critical respiratory event) and time for readiness for Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) will also be assessed.

Inclusion Criteria:

• ASA 1-3 patients
• Undergoing laparoscopic surgery of duration time expected under 120 minutes using general anesthesia with sevoflurane
• Fully consented
• Age > 18yo
• No allergy to one of the medications used in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of severe coronary artery disease; ventricular dysfunction, serious cardiac arrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation and high-grade atrioventricular block)
• Moderate to severe renal or hepatic dysfunction
• Allergy to any drug used in the study protocol
• Refusal of the patient for participation in the study
• History of severe PONV

The patient, the anesthesiologist in charge, the surgeon, the PACU staff and the research team evaluating the patient in PACU will be blinded to the randomization group.

The syringe containing the dexmedetomidine or the placebo will be prepared by an anesthesiologist or a pharmacist external to the study and identified by a unique number so that the patient's group can be identified if needed. Both solutions are translucent and total volume to be administered on 10 minutes during induction will be of equal volume.