Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Loss of funding- Study halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or receiving intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new pain medication in development, clonidine micropellet. Participants will receive a single injection of either clonidine micropellet or sham injection for the treatment of low back and leg pain from sciatica.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clonidine Micropellets Injection | Active Comparator | Clonidine Micropellets single dose injection into the lumbar epidural space |
|
| Sham Insertion | Sham Comparator | Sham Control non-epidural needle placement |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clonidine Micropellets | Drug | 0.975 mg clonidine hydrochloride as 3 micropellets administered in one injection |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary efficacy: Pain Intensity Difference (PID) for the average pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to D90 in lumbosacral radiculopathy. | Difference in average pain score, using a scale of 0-10 with 0 no pain and 10 worst possible pain, from baseline to day 90. | Baseline to day 90 |
| Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events. | Difference in incidence of adverse events and treatment due to radicular leg pain from Baseline to day 90 post injection based on physical examination findings and vital signs measurements. | Baseline to day 90 |
| Incidence of symptomatic hypotension as an adverse event of special interest. | Difference in incidence defined as low blood pressure associated with subject-reported symptoms of dizziness, lightheadedness, syncope, blurred vision, or nausea. | Baseline to day 90 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score | 6 categories of 10 question, each question is scored from 0-5 (minimum to maximum). The scores range from 0-100% with lower scores meaning less disability. | Baseline to month12 |
| Difference in Rescue medication consumption. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Must be between 18 and 70 years of age (inclusive) at time the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed.
Must have a primary diagnosis of unilateral lumbar and/or lumbosacral radiculopathy defined by all of the following: supported by history, physical examination, and radiologic pathology consistent with a disc protrusion, non-sequestered extrusion, or sequestered fragment, as evidenced by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), that is consistent with the clinical signs and symptoms of lumbar or lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Subject's pain must have a radicular component (radiation into the leg along the L3-S1 [inclusive] dermatomal pattern) and may or may not be associated with additional neuropathic features such as reduced sensory, motor, or deep tendon reflexes.
Baseline 0-10 NRS average pain score localized to at least 1 target location must be ≥6 and ≤9.
Subjects must be able to separately distinguish and characterize the contribution of back and leg pain to their overall pain to independently assess the response of each to intervention. Investigators must confirm that subjects can do so based upon pain diagrams and direct questioning.
Subjects must have had no significant improvement following a minimum of 8 weeks of the following categories prior to Screening:
Subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative (serum) pregnancy test at Screening and a negative urine pregnancy test within 24 hours before the injection procedure and must commit to either abstain continuously from sexual intercourse or to use, at the Investigator's discretion, highly effective birth control during the study period.
Must sign an ICF indicating that they understand the purpose and any risks associated with the procedure required for the study and is willing to participate in the study to completion.
Must be willing and able to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in the protocol.
Must be able to read, write, understand, and complete study-related tasks, and adequately communicate regularly with the site.
Must have an email address and access to the internet from an electronic device in order to complete daily EDQ information.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject has significant pain unrelated to the lumbar or lumbosacral radiculopathy (eg, knee pain, hip pain, or rib pain) that, in the Investigator's opinion, could require chronic analgesic treatment and interfere with the assessment of IP therapeutic effect.
Subject has radiological findings or presenting features such as severe motor weakness (with or without reduced deep tendon reflexes) and is a candidate for surgical referral (i.e., progressive neurologic deficit or cauda equina syndrome).
Subject has evidence of pathology on MRI (obtained during the current episode of pain) that may result in pain unlikely to be addressed by the IP, including but not limited to the following:
Subject has a history of, or current diagnosis of, fibromyalgia.
Subject has a history of lumbar surgery and/or intradiscal interventions (including discography).
Subject has an active infection (eg, fever or other objective evidence of an infection within 7 days of the planned injection) or any skin condition visible at the injection site at time of Screening.
Subject has evidence of a coagulation abnormality or history of abnormal bleeding or is on anticoagulation therapy at time of Screening.
Subject has current untreated or clinically significant anxiety and/or depression as defined by the following:
Subject is planning to receive a spinal injection or spine procedure while participating in this study, unless this procedure can be postponed until study completion.
Subject has received an ESI, nerve block, or other similar procedure in the lumbosacral area performed during the 8 weeks prior to Screening.
Subject is receiving or has received the following medications prohibited in this study:
Subject has a history of treatment, or has been recommended for treatment, of alcohol or drug use disorder treatment within the year prior to Screening.
Subject has a known or suspected allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to any of the following:
Subject has recent (within previous 8 weeks) symptomatic hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, or bradycardia.
Subject has a Body Mass Index (BMI) or a body habitus that, in the Investigator's judgment, would require a needle longer than a 3.5-inch Tuohy needle.
Subject has participated in a clinical trial of an investigational drug or device within 30 days of Screening.
Subject has previously participated in a clinical trial sponsored by Sollis Therapeutics (including Protocol Number STX-015-18-01 and Protocol Number STX-015-18-02).
Subject has any medical condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, could adversely impact study participation or safety, require chronic analgesic treatment, or interfere with the pain assessments (eg, painful neuropathy, rheumatologic disorder, etc.).
Subject has worker's compensation benefits and/or is involved in any litigation related to his/her radicular pain.
Subject is currently pregnant or breast feeding, planning to become pregnant or, if of childbearing potential, is unwilling to have a pregnancy test administered or use appropriate, highly effective contraception.
Subject is unable or unwilling to undergo MRI examinations.
Subject is unable to adequately rate his/her pain in the EDQ.
Presence of active kidney disease, as evidenced by an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 utilizing the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation.
Subjects will be excluded from randomization if they have any of the following during the 7-day Baseline Period:
Employees of Sollis Therapeutics, Novotech Health Holdings, or study site personnel directly affiliated with this study, and their immediate family members. Immediate family is defined as a spouse, parent, child, or sibling, whether biological or legally adopted.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pima Pain Center (site 125) | Tucson | Arizona | 85711 | United States | ||
| University of Arizona/Banner (site 116) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Clonidine Micropellet vs Sham-Control
Not provided
Not provided
Double-Blinded
| Tuohy epidural needle | Device | 18-gauge Tuohy epidural needle using a custom-built injector |
|
Consumption from baseline through day 30 |
| Baseline to month12 |
| Change in Average and Worst NRS from Day 90 post injection to 12 months post injection. | Difference in NRS pain scores from Day 90 to month 12 post injection. | from Day 90 to month 12 post injection |
| Percent of subjects with significant improvement in pain. | 30 percent improvement in pain from baseline to day 90. | Baseline to day 90 |
| Tucson |
| Arizona |
| 85711 |
| United States |
| Quality of Life Medical & Research Centers, LLC (site 127) | Tucson | Arizona | 85712 | United States |
| UCSD (site 124) | La Jolla | California | 92037 | United States |
| Nurovations/Napa Pain Institute (site 107) | Napa | California | 94558 | United States |
| International Spine, Pain & Performance Center (site 118) | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 22205 | United States |
| Mocasa Wellness Center (site 119) | Miami | Florida | 33135 | United States |
| AMPM Research Clinic (site 106) | Miami | Florida | 33169 | United States |
| Florida Pain Relief Group (site 126) | Tampa | Florida | 33603 | United States |
| Conquest Research (site 142) | Winter Park | Florida | 32789 | United States |
| Injury Care Research (site 130) | Boise | Idaho | 83713 | United States |
| University of Kansas Medical Center (site 137) | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| Neuroscience Research Center (site 105) | Overland Park | Kansas | 66210 | United States |
| Brigham and Women's Hospital (site 129) | Chestnut Hill | Massachusetts | 02467 | United States |
| St. Louis Pain Consultants (site 134) | Chesterfield | Missouri | 63017 | United States |
| Wake Forest Pain & Spine Specialists (site 112) | Clemmons | North Carolina | 27012 | United States |
| The Center for Clinical Research (site 101) | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic (site 121) | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| University Hospitals (site 131) | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| Clinical Investigations LLC (site 103) | Edmond | Oklahoma | 73013 | United States |
| Pacific Sports and Spine, LLC (site 133) | Eugene | Oregon | 97401 | United States |
| Clinical Trials of South Carolina (site 114) | Charleston | South Carolina | 29406 | United States |
| HRMD Research (site 102) | Dallas | Texas | 75240 | United States |
| UT Southwestern (site 140) | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| NCP Clinical Research (site 141) | Houston | Texas | 77008 | United States |
| Texas Pain Consultant Associates (site 110) | Sugar Land | Texas | 77479 | United States |
| ARH Research, LLC (site 108) | The Woodlands | Texas | 77382 | United States |
| Space City Pain (site 135) | Webster | Texas | 77598 | United States |
| Physicians' Research Options (site 122) | Draper | Utah | 84020 | United States |
| CenExel JBR Clinical Research (site 113) | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84107 | United States |