Relative Validation of a Remote Novel Food Frequency Questionnaire Compared to 24hr Recalls in the ZOE AFFIRM Study
Relative Validation of a Remote Novel Food Frequency Questionnaire Compared to 24hr Recalls in the ZOE AFFIRM Study
Dietary assessment is critical for dietary research. Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQ) measure habitual dietary intake and are low user and researcher burden. The ZOE AFFIRM study aims to assess the relative validity of a novel FFQ compared to a widely accepted 24h dietary recall tool in a remote setting.
Research Question:
What is the relative validity of a novel FFQ (Food Frequency Questionnaire) compared to a widely accepted 24h dietary recall tool in a remote setting?
Research Aim:
This study aims to relatively validate the ZFFQ (ZOE Food Frequency Questionnaire; ZOE Ltd) by assessing its agreement with a widely accepted 24h diet recall tool, Intake24 (Newcastle University) in a remote population.
Design:
This study will be conducted in a single-arm design with the intake period under assessment comprising one month.
Population: In brief, participants are generally healthy UK-based adults who provided consent to participation in this remote study. Please see the eligibility section for full criteria. Participants provided consent before undertaking any study procedures.
Data analysis: Agreement analysis will be used to compare both dietary assessment methods and evaluate the relative validity of the ZOE FFQ.
Data collection:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Do not meet the inclusion criteria.
emily.leeming@kcl.ac.uk07791131380
inbar.linenberg@kcl.ac.uk