Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
increase mortality rate in cases that made it difficult to follow up
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Introduction Aim of the work Patients and methods Type of study Exclusion criteria Statistical analysis Research ethics Reference
Septic shock is a serious infectious condition characterized by low blood pressure and multiple organ damage. One of the traditional recommendations is to administer intravenous fluids as the first step to improve blood pressure(1).
However, studies have shown that not every patient benefits from aggressive intravenous hydration (2).
Previous studies have shown that certain parameters may correlate with volume status and others may not to correlate with patient volume status.
Hemodynamic parameters, such as stroke volume variation (SVV) and pleth variability index (PVI) may better predict fluid responsiveness. However, assessments of these parameters require invasive procedures and special monitoring equipment, which limits their clinical application (4).
Echocardiography has been widely adopted to diagnose and monitor cardiac dysfunction leading to hemodynamic instability, and shock pathophysiology in general.
However, the echocardiographic information on macro-hemodynamics is partial, especially as being indirect as concerns vascular tone, and not allowing any inference on end-organ perfusion (5).
Recently, ultrasonography for estimating volume status has been widely recommended because of its non-invasive nature, ease of acquisition, and reproducibility of measurements.
The inferior vena cava (IVC) is a compliant vessel whose size and shape vary with changes in CVP and intravascular volume. Therefore, sonographic measurement of the IVC represents an effective and non-invasive method of estimating CVP.
Respiratory variation in the IVC diameter was used as a guide for fluid therapy in septic shock in both spontaneous breathing and mechanically ventilated patients.
Moreover, the assessment of visceral end-organ perfusion by ultrasound, may offer insights into this facet of shock pathophysiology (5).
Among these ultrasound modalities, corrected flow time (FTc) measured in the carotid artery is a new approach for predicting fluid responsiveness that has shown promising results.
Therefore, although it is a dynamic index, it may be able to adequately evaluate volume status in spontaneously and mechanically breathing patients.
Aim of the work: 1- To evaluate whether carotid FTc as determined by Doppler ultrasound could be a predictor of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients.
2- To evaluate the predictive ability of ΔVpeak for fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients.
3- To detect changes of regional splanchnic hemodynamics by color Doppler resistive index, and its improvement after fluid administration.
4- To evaluate the predictive ability of IVC collapsibility and distensibility indices for fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
5- To compare between the predictive ability of the measured Ultrasonographic parameters and the CVP changes in response to intravenous fluid therapy in both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated septic shock patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US , Echocardiography | Device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasonographic predictors of intravenous fluid responsiveness in septic shock and its correlation to central venous pressure | To evaluate whether carotid FTc as determined by Doppler ultrasound could be a predictor of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing and MV patients. | Baseline |
| Evaluation the predictive ability of ΔVpeak for fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. | To evaluate the predictive ability of ΔVpeak for fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. and the ΔVpeak will be calculated as follows: (maximum peak velocity - minimum peak velocity)/[(maximum peak velocity + minimum peak velocity)/2] × 100 | Baseline |
| Detection changes of regional splanchnic hemodynamics by color Doppler resistive index, and its improvement after fluid administration. | To detect changes of regional splanchnic hemodynamics by color Doppler resistive index, and its improvement after fluid administration. Resistive index (RI): (peak systolic velocity - end-diastolic velocity) / peak systolic velocity. The normal range is 0.50-0.70. | Baseline |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
After recording these data, the patients will be administered a fluid challenge of a 500 mL fluid bolus of 0.9% normal saline over 10 min and then same haemodynamic parameters will be measured again.
Fluid responsiveness is an increase of stroke volume of 10-15% by echocardiography, after the patient receives 500 ml of crystalloid over 10 min.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| olfat M elshinawy, professor | Assiut University | Principal Investigator |
| mohamed M abdelhady, professor | Assiut University | Principal Investigator |
| arafa M aboelhassan | Assiut University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tasneem Hassan Younes | Asyut | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29675566 | Background | Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):925-928. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5085-0. Epub 2018 Apr 19. No abstract available. | |
| 26578400 | Background | Vandervelden S, Malbrain ML. Initial resuscitation from severe sepsis: one size does not fit all. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47 Spec No:s44-55. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0075. Epub 2015 Nov 18. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012772 | Shock, Septic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018805 | Sepsis |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D018746 | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004452 | Echocardiography |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057791 | Cardiac Imaging Techniques |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 26020673 | Background | Lammi MR, Aiello B, Burg GT, Rehman T, Douglas IS, Wheeler AP, deBoisblanc BP; National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Network Investigators. Response to fluid boluses in the fluid and catheter treatment trial. Chest. 2015 Oct;148(4):919-926. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0445. |
| 23673097 | Background | Hu B, Xiang H, Liang H, Yu L, Xu T, Yang JH, DU ZH, Li JG. Assessment effect of central venous pressure in fluid resuscitation in the patients with shock: a multi-center retrospective research. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(10):1844-9. |
| 31654077 | Background | Corradi F, Via G, Tavazzi G. What's new in ultrasound-based assessment of organ perfusion in the critically ill: expanding the bedside clinical monitoring window for hypoperfusion in shock. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):775-779. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05791-y. Epub 2019 Oct 25. No abstract available. |
| 33122575 | Background | Kim HJ, Choi YS, Kim SH, Lee W, Kwon JY, Kim DH. Predictability of preoperative carotid artery-corrected flow time for hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing caesarean section: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;38(4):394-401. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001376. |
| D010335 |
| Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D012769 | Shock |
| D014463 | Ultrasonography |
| D006334 | Heart Function Tests |
| D003935 | Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular |