Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to independently evaluate the usability and performance of rapid assays detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigen(s) and intended for self-testing. For this, the results of the test performed and interpreted by an untrained lay user will be compared to the results obtained by a trained healthcare professional using the same test kit, and, separately, to the current gold standard for testing, RT-PCR detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA
The COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly spread across the globe. As 03 March 2022, there are approximately 438 517 285 confirmed cases worldwide. Recent surge of new infections globally due to omicron variant led to significant increase of testing demand. Although rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigens are now authorized in most countries and contribute substantially to expanding of testing capacity, shortage of healthcare resources is an important barrier to further scale up. Self-testing has been widely used in many high-income countries as an additional tool to provide convenient and timely access to testing. A number of self-tests detecting SARS-CoV-2 have been authorized by stringent regulatory authorities (SRA) such as US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), CE-IVD, Health Canada, Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA) under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) self-testing for SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been widely adopted. Data on self-test use in LMIC are still very limited and the performance of SARS-CoV-2 self-test assays was not evaluated in LMIC settings. Additionally, the price for self-test kits is often prohibitive to its wide use in low resource settings. In 2021, FIND, the Diagnostic Alliance, through an open request for proposal (RFP) has identified several manufacturers of affordable and easy-to-use self-testing assays for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in nasal swabs and saliva specimens. FIND and [NAME OF THE PARTNER] aim to evaluate these novel affordable self-testing solutions in LMIC settings in a 2-phase study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To determine the SARS-CoV-2 self-tests label comprehension by the intended users by assessing the extent to which the users understand the information in the self-test labelling | Proportion of study participants that correctly comprehend key messages from packaging and labelling measured by the proportion of participants providing correct responses to a self-administered semi-structured question | 4 weeks |
| To determine the ability of the intended users to correctly interpret testing results by evaluating the correctness of user's interpretation of contrived results | Percentage of the agreement between the pre-defined results of contrived self-testing devices and their interpretation by study participants | 4 weeks |
| Phase 11 Outcomes | a. Proportion of participants that performed the self-testing procedure correctly and usability index of each testing step (Proportion of participants that performed each step correctly); documented errors and difficulties faced at each self-testing step | 6weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the usability in specific subgroups defined based on demographic characteristics such as age and education level | Proportion of participants that correctly comprehend key messages from packaging and labelling, performed the self-testing procedure and interpreted the results correctly in specific subgroups defined based on age and educational level. Documented errors and difficulties at each self-testing step in these subgroups |
Not provided
Phase 1 Inclusion Criteria:
Phase 11 inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants from general population who are able to read the local language and have no prior experience with covid self-specimen collection and testing. For Phase II, (less than 18 years) old suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 (as per national or WHO guidelines) presenting at the testing site(s) will be invited to participate.
Participants will come from the following countries: Georgia, South Africa, Uganda and Peru
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Maia Alkhazashvili, MD | Lugar Centre | Principal Investigator |
| Isaac Ssewanyana, Phd | Uganda National Laboratory Services | Principal Investigator |
| Mohhamed Majam, Msc | Ezintsha Research Centre | Principal Investigator |
| Cesar Ugarte, Phd | UPCH | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ezintsha Research Centre | Johannesburg | Guateng | South Africa | |||
| Uganda National Health Laboratories Services |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086382 | COVID-19 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011024 | Pneumonia, Viral |
| D011014 | Pneumonia |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 6 weeks |
| To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 self-tests in specific subgroups defined based on the presence of symptoms, RT-PCR Ct values, vaccination status | Point estimates of sensitivity and specificity of index test with 95% confidence intervals in specific subgroups defined based on presence of symptoms, RT-PCR Ct values, vaccination status | 6 weeks |
| Kampala |
| Uganda |
| D014777 |
| Virus Diseases |
| D018352 | Coronavirus Infections |
| D003333 | Coronaviridae Infections |
| D030341 | Nidovirales Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |