Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to provide a feasible surgical strategy based on Nagata method for patients who require secondary revision surgeries and to verify its long-term aesthetic outcomes. The main question it aims to answer is:
• Whether ear reconstruction surgery based on Nagata method can improve the unsatisfactory outcomes of primary reconstruction surgery? Participants who had accepted secondary ear reconstruction based on Nagata method in our department will be required to received questionnaires in the follow-up and their photographs will be collected for reconstructed ear evaluation of its realness through convolutional neural network (CNN) models we previously developed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| secondary ear reconstruction based on Nagata method | Procedure | Secondary auricular reconstructions based on Nagata method were conducted on patients who sought for secondary revision. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Preoperative and postoperative scores evaluated based on CNN | Preoperative and postoperative photographs were acquired for reconstructed ear evaluation of its realness and appearance improvement through convolutional neural network (CNN) models we previously developed. | change from baseline in appearance scores at 7 months after secondary surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Five-point Likert scale scores | Five-point Likert scale score will be collected to show patient-reported outcomes in the follow-up study through questionnaires to assess patients' postoperative satisfaction. This questionnaire includes overall appearance, size, projection and subunits of the ear and the postoperative status of donor site. 1 = poor and 5 = excellent. | at least 7 months after secondary surgery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Microtia patients seeking for secondary ear reconstructions who had previously received reconstructive surgeries while the aesthetic outcomes were displeasing
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Meishui Wang, Master | First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University | Fuzhou | Fujian | 350000 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25289252 | Background | Long X, Yu N, Huang J, Wang X. Complication rate of autologous cartilage microtia reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2013 Nov 7;1(7):e57. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0b013e3182aa8784. eCollection 2013 Oct. | |
| 28041938 | Background | Akter F, Mennie JC, Stewart K, Bulstrode N. Patient reported outcome measures in microtia surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Mar;70(3):416-424. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Nov 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 35183463 | Background | Ye J, Lei C, Wei Z, Wang Y, Zheng H, Wang M, Wang B. Evaluation of reconstructed auricles by convolutional neural networks. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Jul;75(7):2293-2301. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.037. Epub 2022 Jan 31. |
| 32332549 | Background | Reinisch JF, van Hovell Tot Westerflier CVA, Gould DJ, Tahiri YT. Secondary Salvage of the Unsatisfactory Microtia Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May;145(5):1252-1261. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006766. |
| 35063805 | Background | Yue X, Jiang H, Pan B, He L, Dong W, Yang Q. Secondary surgery for the unsatisfactory auricle after auricular reconstruction. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Mar;154:111043. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111043. Epub 2022 Jan 14. |
| 34481742 | Background | Ronde EM, Esposito M, Lin Y, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Bulstrode NW, Breugem CC. Long-term complications of microtia reconstruction: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Dec;74(12):3235-3250. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 17. |
| 17201920 | Background | Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. How young can children reliably and validly self-report their health-related quality of life?: an analysis of 8,591 children across age subgroups with the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jan 3;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-1. |
| 19451041 | Background | Lee TS, Lim SY, Pyon JK, Mun GH, Bang SI, Oh KS. Secondary revisions due to unfavourable results after microtia reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jun;63(6):940-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.04.016. Epub 2009 May 17. |
| 37924716 | Derived | Su XH, Ye J, Lei C, Wei SJ, Zheng HB, Shan XY, Wang B, Wang MS. Secondary ear reconstruction based on the Nagata method after unsatisfactory microtia surgery outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Dec;87:251-258. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.075. Epub 2023 Oct 14. |