Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Invibio Ltd decided to leave the market and stop PEEK production
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Invibio Ltd | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to evaluate the outcome of a Poly-ether-ether-ketone - used in single teeth implant-supported rehabilitations after one year of follow-up. The main question it aims to answer is:
- What is the survival outcome of single teeth implant-supported prosthesis using Poly-ether-ether-ketone? The participants already rehabilitated with a single tooth dental implant will receive a definitive prosthesis incorporating Poly-ether-ehter-ketone.
Following the previous study on the full-arch rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using hybrid prostheses with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) infrastructure and acrylic resin teeth supported by implants in immediate function inserted through the All-on-4 concept it is necessary to further extend the evaluation to the partial rehabilitation using Single Crowns. To test this, the study design to be used will be a single centre, prospective, observational cohort study to evaluate the short term outcome of fixed prosthetic implant-supported rehabilitations. The sample of this study consists in 10 patients consecutively treated. The cohort will be evaluated after 6 months and 12 months after dental loading and annually thereafter as long as the patient is willing regarding: prosthetic survival including repair and relining, implant survival, marginal bone resorption, incidence of mechanical complications (loosening or fracture of prosthetic components), biological complications (peri-implant infection, suppuration, abscess, fistulae), patient tissue reaction, aesthetic examination including staining, colour stability and anatomical form; patient in mouth comfort and quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile OHIP-14 questionnaire; and assessment of prosthetic preparation (technician satisfaction), laboratory preparation time, clinical operative time and costs for economical purposes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prosthetic single-tooth prosthesis using PEEK | Experimental | An implant-supported single tooth prosthesis using a PEEK polymer in its composition |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prosthetic single-tooth prosthesis using PEEK | Device | A single tooth implant-supported fixed prosthesis using PEEK polymer in its composition delivered as definitive prosthesis. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Survival of the prosthesis | Evaluation of the survival for the implant-supported crowns; nominal (survival,failure) | one year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Survival of the implants | Evaluation of the survival for implants supporting the PEEK-acrylic resin implant-supported prosthesis; nominal (survival,failure) | one year |
| Incidence of biological complications |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Miguel A de Araújo Nobre, PhD | Director of Research, Development and Education | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malo Clinic | Lisbon | Lisbon District | 1600-042 | Portugal |
Anonymized database containing the study variables
Upon study completion and for 8 years.
Upon solicitation to the Investigators
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011475 | Prosthesis Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective cohort study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Peri-implant infection, abscess, fistulae, suppuration, sinus infection, gingival dehiscence; Nominal (no incidence, incidence)
| one year |
| Incidence of mechanical complications | Loosening or fracture of prosthetic components; Nominal (no incidence, incidence) | one year |
| Marginal bone resorption | Measured through periapical radiographs, in mm between the implant shoulder and the most apical portion of implant-bone contact; Scale | one year |
| Denture staining | Veneer staining; 0:heavily stained; 10: no stains | one year |
| Denture colour stability | Veneer colour stability. Visual analoge scale (0-10 cm); 0: heavily destabilized colour; 10: complete colour stability | one year |
| Denture anatomic form | Anatomic form stability. Visual analogue scale (0-10 cm); 0: heavy loss of anatomical shape; 10: complete anatomic stability. | one year |
| Patient tissue reaction | Visual analogue scale (0-10 cm); 0:very poor; 10: very good | one year |
| ln mouth comfort | Patient in mouth comfort. Visual analogue scale (0-10 cm); 0:very poor; 10: very good | one year |
| Oral Health Impact Profile OHIP-14 | Oral Health Impact Profile OHIP-14 questionnaire | one year |
| Laboratory preparation time | Average laboratory time to produce the finished prosthesis, the active technician time spent in Computer assisted design, Computer assisted manufacture, mill and veneering. | one year |
| Clinical operative time | Average operative time to load the final prosthesis | one year |