Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Demant's transfer of its cochlear implant activity to Cochlear. Slow recruitment and misalignment with Cochlear's interests are also determining factors.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This trial is a monocentric, prospective and controlled study of the pupil response to detect hearing threshold and comfortable loudness of normal-hearing (NH) and CI-subjects.
The purpose of the clinical investigation is to explore the pupil dilation response of subjects with a cochlear implant and to provide proof of concept that it is possible to perform the adaptation of a cochlear implant using pupillometry.
The population of this study is divided in 2 group:
Mainly used in audiology to evaluate listening effort, pupillometry is an objective measure that could also be used for fittings. Studies have shown that sound intensity influence pupil dilation. indeed, normal hearing and hearing aids subjects exhibit larger pupil responses with increasing intensity/loudness. The purpose of this study is to explore the pupil dilation response of cochlear implant subjects and to provide a proof of concept that we can perform cochlear implant fitting using pupillometry.
Implanted subjects (Cl group) will undergo up to 3 visits:
Normal-hearing listeners (control group) will undergo up to 2 visits:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group (normal hearing in regards of age) | Other | Normal hearing participants according to pure tone hearing levels defined for age and tested frequency (audiometry ISO 7029 and Wang & Puel, 2020 recommendations for hearing loss at the tested frequencies). Total of 32 subjects in this arm. |
|
| CI group (cochlear implanted subjects) | Experimental | Cochlear implanted subjects with bilateral, severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, with at least one Oticon Medical cochlear implant system . Up to 40 subjects in this arm:
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pupillometry (Eve-tracking measurements) | Other | Pupillometry measurements are carried out by a dedicated device (eye tracker), which includes cameras allowing the measurement of pupillary dilation. The subject stands in front of a screen and fixes a point in the center of the screen, the cameras placed on the screen allowing a measurement of the pupillary dilation in a non-invasive way. These eye-tracking measurements are performed simultaneously with an auditory task and allow to study the pupil's response to different stimuli. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement of the pupil dilation response to a range of auditory stimuli (acoustic and electric). | Pupil dilation response for each intensity and frequency [Mean pupil dilatation in milimeters] | At Visit 2 (Month 1) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the loudness perception of the subjects regarding the different auditory stimuli (acoustic and electric) to correlate the results to the pupil dilation response. | Loudness score corresponding to each pupil dilation response. [Using Oticon Medical Loudness scale: scale from 0 to 10 following the ISO 16832. 0 (zero) corresponding to inaudible level and 10 to extremely loud (intolerable) sounds.] |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Both groups:
Control group (normal hearing in regards of age):
• Normal hearing participants according to pure tone hearing levels defined for age and tested frequency (audiometry ISO 7029 and Wand & Puel, 2020 recommendations for hearing loss at the tested frequencies)
CI group (cochlear implant subjects):
Exclusion Criteria:
Both groups, according to the best practices for pupillometry (Winn et al., 2018):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Isabelle Mosnier | Centre de Recherche en Audiologie adulte - CreA- GH Pitié Salpêtrière (APHP) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre de Recherche en Audiologie adulte GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP Sorbonne Université, Unité Fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et Explorations Fonctionnelles, 52 Bd Vincent Auriol, 75013 Paris, France | Paris | 75013 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31947524 | Background | Wang J, Puel JL. Presbycusis: An Update on Cochlear Mechanisms and Therapies. J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 14;9(1):218. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010218. | |
| 24688394 | Background | Vaerenberg B, Smits C, De Ceulaer G, Zir E, Harman S, Jaspers N, Tam Y, Dillon M, Wesarg T, Martin-Bonniot D, Gartner L, Cozma S, Kosaner J, Prentiss S, Sasidharan P, Briaire JJ, Bradley J, Debruyne J, Hollow R, Patadia R, Mens L, Veekmans K, Greisiger R, Harboun-Cohen E, Borel S, Tavora-Vieira D, Mancini P, Cullington H, Ng AH, Walkowiak A, Shapiro WH, Govaerts PJ. Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the state of the art. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 4;2014:501738. doi: 10.1155/2014/501738. eCollection 2014. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006319 | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural |
| D006312 | Hearing Loss, Bilateral |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
A control group with normal hearing subjects versus a CI group with cochlear implanted subjects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| At Visit 2 (Month 1) and Visit 3 (Month 2)* [* if done] |
| 35326347 | Background | Legris E, Galvin J, Mofid Y, Aguillon-Hernandez N, Roux S, Aoustin JM, Gomot M, Bakhos D. Relationship between Behavioral and Objective Measures of Sound Intensity in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Hearing-Aid Users: A Pilot Study. Brain Sci. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):392. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12030392. |
| 33940918 | Background | Versfeld NJ, Lie S, Kramer SE, Zekveld AA. Informational masking with speech-on-speech intelligibility: Pupil response and time-course of learning. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Apr;149(4):2353. doi: 10.1121/10.0003952. |
| 34898265 | Background | Dingemanse G, Goedegebure A. Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Speech Intelligibility, Noise Reduction Processing, and Working Memory Capacity on the Pupil Dilation Response. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jan 12;65(1):392-404. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00230. Epub 2021 Dec 13. |
| 31792632 | Background | Bala ADS, Whitchurch EA, Takahashi TT. Human Auditory Detection and Discrimination Measured with the Pupil Dilation Response. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2020 Feb;21(1):43-59. doi: 10.1007/s10162-019-00739-x. Epub 2019 Dec 2. |
| 35306326 | Background | Jackson IR, Sirois S. But that's possible! Infants, pupils, and impossible events. Infant Behav Dev. 2022 May;67:101710. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101710. Epub 2022 Mar 17. |
| 33746375 | Background | Kaldy Z, Blaser E. Putting effort into infant cognition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2020 Apr;29(2):180-185. doi: 10.1177/0963721420903015. Epub 2020 Feb 27. |
| 33240035 | Background | Russo FY, Hoen M, Karoui C, Demarcy T, Ardoint M, Tuset MP, De Seta D, Sterkers O, Lahlou G, Mosnier I. Pupillometry Assessment of Speech Recognition and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Patients. Front Neurosci. 2020 Nov 6;14:556675. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.556675. eCollection 2020. |
| 32885711 | Background | Schramm D, Chen J, Morris DP, Shoman N, Philippon D, Caye-Thomasen P, Hoen M, Karoui C, Laplante-Levesque A, Gnansia D. Clinical efficiency and safety of the oticon medical neuro cochlear implant system: a multicenter prospective longitudinal study. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Sep;17(9):959-967. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1814741. Epub 2020 Oct 3. |
| 35794416 | Background | Sulas E, Hasan PY, Zhang Y, Patou F. Streamlining experiment design in cognitive hearing science using OpenSesame. Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jun;55(4):1965-1979. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01886-5. Epub 2022 Jul 6. |
| 30261825 | Background | Winn MB, Wendt D, Koelewijn T, Kuchinsky SE. Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started. Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518800869. doi: 10.1177/2331216518800869. |
| D012678 |
| Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |