Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Joint replacement is a valuable surgical intervention that improves quality of life, provides pain relief, and restores function of patients. However, some patients need revision surgery due to failure of the implant, with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remaining a rare but serious complication following total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. Diagnosing PJI is a major challenge as no diagnostic test with absolute accuracy exists. The diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical findings, laboratory results from peripheral blood and synovial fluid, microbiological culture, histological evaluation of periprosthetic tissue, and intraoperative findings. However, the preoperative diagnosis can be inconclusive and operative criteria are required for the definitive diagnosis. Therefore, novel diagnosing tools for identification of PJI are necessary.
A recent study using a gene reporter assay, identified biomarkers in synovial fluid that define joint states in patients with osteoarthritis.However, no previous studies have investigated cellular signaling in synovial fluid of patients with PJI. With this study we want to explore the potential of a reporter gene assay of synovial fluid in patients with PJI and without PJI of their TKA and THA.
Also, flow cytometry analysis of biological fluids has recently received increased attention as a potentially valuable method in diagnosing infections. For example, the method is already used to analyze urine samples for urinary tract infections. Recently, researchers have now also used this method to screen for the presence of bacteria. The most important limitation of flow cytometry analysis of synovial fluids for bacteria to date is that it is unclear as to which bacteria count value - the cutoff value - represent patients with PJI and which represent patients without PJI. With this study we want to explore the potential of flow cytometry analysis of synovial fluid in categorizing patients with PJI and without PJI.
Our primary objective is to explore the value of synovial fluid analysis using a reporter gene assay and flow cytometry in the detection of a periprosthetic joint infection.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PJI | Patients diagnosed with a PJI based on the EBJIS criteria ('Infection confirmed') |
| |
| No PJI | Patients not diagnosed with a PJI based on EBJIS criteria |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporter Gene Assay | Diagnostic Test | Transcription factor reporter gene assay using luciferase |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fold change of luciferase assay | Diagnostic performance of the reporter gene assay of synovial fluid by calculating fold change data from the reporter gene measurements. A luciferase assay will be performed using the collected synovial fluid and the amount of luciferase activity will be measured by luminometer and expressed in relative light units (RLU). A background control (e.g., medium or buffer alone) will be used to evaluate raw RLU values that will be subtracted from all the sample values for better accuracy. The data for the reporter assay will be expressed using an equation to determine normalized fold change in activity between the two groups. | Within 30 days of surgery |
| Diagnostic performance of flow cytometric analysis | Diagnostic performance of the flow cytometry analysis of synovial fluid by determining difference in results between two groups using ROC curve analysis. If a cut-off point has been determined, sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), negative (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) can be calculated. | Within 4 hours of surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity of the flow cytometric analysis | Within 4 hours of surgery | |
| Specificity of the flow cytometric analysis | Within 4 hours of surgery | |
| Positive predictive value of the flow cytometric analysis |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients visiting the outpatient clinic of the participating hospitals and planned for elective revision surgery of their THA or TKA.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rijnstate Hospital | Arnhem | Gelderland | 6815AD | Netherlands |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016459 | Prosthesis-Related Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005434 | Flow Cytometry |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002469 | Cell Separation |
| D003584 | Cytological Techniques |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Flow Cytometry | Diagnostic Test | Flow Cytometry Analysis using the Sysmex UF-4000, analyzing for bacteria, mononuclear and polymorphonuclear cells, and red blood cell and white blood cell count. |
|
| Within 4 hours of surgery |
| Negative predictive value of the flow cytometric analysis | Within 4 hours of surgery |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D003592 | Cytophotometry |
| D005470 | Fluorometry |
| D008163 | Luminescent Measurements |
| D010783 | Photometry |
| D002623 | Chemistry Techniques, Analytical |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |