Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the functional impact of using a bionic myoelectric prosthesis (Hero Arm) in children with a transverse forearm agenesis upper limb deformity, after one year of use. The Hero Arm prosthesis is the first bionic myoelectric prosthesis reimbursed in France for children.
The main objective is to Identify the functional difficulties encountered by the child related to the agenesis and which could be improved by wearing this prosthesis.
The investigators will include children born between 2006 and 2012 with a unilateral upper limb malformation. These children are regularly followed at Reference Center for Limb Malformations (CEREFAM) at the Saint-Maurice Hospitals (HSM) for a unilateral upper limb deformity. CEREFAM is currently following a large cohort of children with malformations including 143 children with transverse forearm agenesis. Of these, approximately 10% have been prescribed a Hero Arm prosthesis.
After the delivery of the Hero Arm, they are followed up in occupational therapy at HSM to learn how to use the prosthesis. This training lasts two days with an evaluation (T0). This assessment includes:
The same assessment will be performed after one year of wearing the prosthesis (T1).
This is a observational and non-interventional study. No changes have been made to the usual follow-up of the patient.
Transverse forearm agenesis (TFA) is a sporadic, non-genetically based, mostly isolated congenital malformation. According to Froster-Iskenius U.G. & Baird P.A, the incidence of this condition is estimated at 1.7 per 10,000 births. This condition is characterized by a lack of partial or complete development of a limb or limb segment. In transverse forearm agenesis (TFA), the majority of the damage occurs at the proximal-middle third of the limb.
In general, with the French administration, people with TFA are not considered to be disabled. However, this malformation can have a functional impact with limitations in certain activities of daily living and in the practice of specific activities (sports, music...). Socially, some patients present a desire to be "unnoticed", especially during adolescence and early adulthood, when entering professional life, for fear of discrimination in hiring. On the other hand, some patients display their malformation and even make it their "trademark".
Currently, agenesis patients are treated by multidisciplinary teams who propose a prosthesis. The prosthesis is not indispensable, patients live with their malformation since birth and are autonomous in their daily life. There are 3 categories of prostheses: aesthetic prostheses, functional prostheses and tool prostheses.
The Hero Arm prosthesis, belonging to the functional prostheses, is the first and only bionic myoelectric prosthesis reimbursed in France for children by the Social Security since 2019. This prosthesis is designed by 3D printing by Open Bionics in England. It is a prosthesis that has a lower cost than other prostheses available on the market, which is not negligible due to the growth of the child, requiring the change of prosthesis annually. The price of a Hero Arm prosthesis is around 12,000 to 15,000 euros. This prosthesis is a departure from traditional aesthetic prosthesis models and is closer to "superhero" type prostheses. In addition, there is a variety of colors available and the appearance can be customized by the children.
Until now, no study has been done on the functional results of the Hero Arm prosthesis in à pediatric context in France.
This is the first study on the use of a new bionic myoelectric prosthesis in children in France, retrospective, allowing to evaluate the service rendered by the medical device and the impact on the quality of life of these children with congenital amputation of the forearm. This study is based on the patients of the Reference Center for Limb Malformations (CEREFAM).
Beyond the functional aspect, this study will allow to frame the prescription of this prosthesis by analyzing the service rendered for the child and their family.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children with unilateral upper limb malformation | Children born between 2006 and 2012, with a unilateral upper limb deformity. These children are regularly followed at CEREFAM for a unilateral upper limb deformity. During their follow-up, they were fitted with different upper limb prostheses. During a consultation with one of the CEREFAM physicians, they requested a Hero Arm prosthesis following the marketing and reimbursement in France in 2019. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Questionnaires and tests | Other | Application of three questionnaires:
1) the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) 2) modified 400-point assessment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (MCRO) / change is being assessed | Designed to detect, from the patient's own words, the disturbances in the occupational balance that occur in the areas of personal care, productivity and leisure. This assessment highlights problems and limitations in the child's participation in meaningful activities. The child must rate his or her performance, i.e., his or her perception of his or her ability to perform the activity, as well as his or her satisfaction with this performance. The child can describe up to 15 problematic items with an estimation on a 10-point ordinal scale (rating) of the importance of the difficulties identified. The examiner, with the child's input, will select the 5 most important difficulties to address. The child will self-assess on a 10-point scale, for each of the selected difficulties, his/her current performance ("I am capable or not") and satisfaction ("I am happy or not"). These are meaningful activities for the child at that age. This measure assessed change between T0 and T1. | T0 at first use of the prosthesis and T1 at 12 months of use |
| Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) / change is being assessed | It was designed to be a region-specific instrument to measure the patient's perception of symptoms and disabilities associated with any upper extremity or joint disorder. We used it as a global functional assessment of the child, to evaluate what he or she is able to do with or without a prosthesis. The DASH consists of 30 items that measure: (a) physical abilities (21 items); (b) symptom severity (5 items) and (c) social abilities or roles (4 items). The DASH is scored using a 5-point Likert scale that rates the individual's difficulties in the previous week. This measure assessed change between T0 and T1 | T0 at first use of the prosthesis and T1 at 12 months of use |
| Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) / change is being assessed | ARAT is a measurement scale for assessing specific changes in limb function in individuals with brain injury (the result being hemiplegia). It assesses the patient's ability to manipulate objects of various sizes, weights, and shapes and can thus be considered a measure of upper extremity-specific activity limitations. The ARAT is divided into four subscales: Grasping; Grasping; Pinching; and Gross Motor Skills. Each subscale is a hierarchical Guttman scale, which means that each item is given in increasing order of difficulty. In the ARAT, if the patient successfully completes the most difficult item on the subscale, this suggests that he or she will succeed on the easier items on that same subscale. Similarly, failure on any item suggests that the patient will be unable to complete the more difficult items on that subscale. This measure assessed change between T0 and T1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The 400-point balance sheet / change is being assessed | This is a functional evaluation of the hand. It proposes an evaluation at 4 levels: motor skills, strength, single-handed grip, bi-manual coordination. Each test is scored out of 100. A modification of the 400-point assessment, involving the use of tests 3 and 4 only, was carried out at the Percy Army Training Hospital to evaluate upper limb prostheses after traumatic amputation. This modified version of the 400-point assessment therefore includes two parts instead of the four in the unmodified version: Test 3: Evaluation of single-handed grasping and moving of objects. This is a timed test, where each hand will be timed. Test 4: Evaluation of two-handed coordination. Non-timed test This measure assessed change between T0 and T1 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We include children born between 2006 and 2012 with a unilateral upper limb malformation. These children are regularly followed at CEREFAM for a unilateral upper limb deformity. During their follow-up, they requested a Hero Arm prosthesis.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nathaly QUINTERO-PRIGENT, Doctor | Centre de Référence pour les Anomalies des Membres (CEREFAM) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hôpitaux de Saint-Maurice | Saint-Maurice | Île-de-France Region | 94410 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22715362 | Background | de Jong IG, Reinders-Messelink HA, Janssen WG, Poelma MJ, van Wijk I, van der Sluis CK. Mixed feelings of children and adolescents with unilateral congenital below elbow deficiency: an online focus group study. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037099. Epub 2012 Jun 8. | |
| 32603326 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D017880 | Limb Deformities, Congenital |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D009139 | Musculoskeletal Abnormalities |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011795 | Surveys and Questionnaires |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| T0 at first use of the prosthesis and T1 at 12 months of use |
| T0 at first use of the prosthesis and T1 at 12 months of use |
| Analytical Questionnaire / change is being assessed | Analytical questionnaire realized by the team of the CEREFAM of Saint Maurice. It is divided into 6 parts:
This measure assessed change between T0 and T1 | T0 at first use of the prosthesis and T1 at 12 months of use |
| Kerver N, van Twillert S, Maas B, van der Sluis CK. User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0234342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234342. eCollection 2020. |
| 28470129 | Background | Widehammar C, Pettersson I, Janeslatt G, Hermansson L. The influence of environment: Experiences of users of myoelectric arm prosthesis-a qualitative study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Feb;42(1):28-36. doi: 10.1177/0309364617704801. Epub 2017 May 4. |
| 27242413 | Background | Cordella F, Ciancio AL, Sacchetti R, Davalli A, Cutti AG, Guglielmelli E, Zollo L. Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users. Front Neurosci. 2016 May 12;10:209. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00209. eCollection 2016. |
| 31083479 | Result | Manero A, Smith P, Sparkman J, Dombrowski M, Courbin D, Kester A, Womack I, Chi A. Implementation of 3D Printing Technology in the Field of Prosthetics: Past, Present, and Future. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 10;16(9):1641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091641. |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |