Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Florida | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This project will develop a data-driven decision making model to assess a competitive athlete's readiness to return to sport after ACL injury and surgery safely.
One hundred pre-collegiate or collegiate athlete participants will be recruited for this study. The duration of the treatment plan will be 24 months. Each of the participants will be qualified for the study due to falling within all inclusion criterion and no exclusion criterion. The screening of the inclusion criterion will occur at visit one of the study. At this time, the AREF Research Team will review and collect informed consent from each participant. Visit two will occur three (3) months after each participant's ACL reconstruction surgery. At this time, an evaluation by the treating physician will occur along with functional movement assessment and MRI. Visit three will occur six (6) months after each participant's ACL reconstruction surgery. At this time, an evaluation by the treating physician will occur along with functional movement assessment and MRI. Visit four will occur nine (9) months after each participant's ACL reconstruction surgery. At this time, an medical evaluation by the treating leading physician will occur along with functional movement assessment and MRI. Visit five will occur twelve (12) months after each participant's ACL reconstruction surgery. At this time, an evaluation by the treating physician will occur along with functional movement assessment and MRI. Visit six will occur eighteen (18) months after each participant's ACL reconstruction surgery. At this time, an evaluation by the treating physician will occur along with functional movement assessment and MRI. Visit seven will occur twenty-four (24) months after each participant's ACL reconstruction surgery. At this time, an evaluation by the treating physician will occur along with functional movement assessment and MRI. At each time point, the treating physician or the therapist performing the functional movement assessment can choose to limit the functional movement assessment if there are concerns that the patient may not be ready for the expected load of one or more elements of the functional movement assessment.
At each monthly time point after ACL reconstruction, patient reported outcomes will be collected by the research team to assist in assessing the overall health and confidence in return to sport for each athlete. The following patient reported outcomes will be collected in written or electronic format after informed consent has been obtained from each participant: Sports Participation, Reinjury, Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale, IKDC, PROMIS, SANE.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collegiate Athletes | Group designated for collegiate athletes; see protocol for treatment plan |
| |
| Pre-collegiate Athletes | Group designated for pre-collegiate, or high school-age, athletes; see protocol for treatment plan |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | Diagnostic Test | Non-invasive imaging technology that produces three-dimensional detailed anatomical images |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia | Measurement to determine the physical and pyschological effects on the rehabilitation of an injured athlete; 17-question survey with a total score calculated after inversion of the individual scores of items 4, 8, 12, and 16 (all questions are scored on a scale of 1-4 points). | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Sports Participation Assessment | Quantifies the participant's participation in sports activity during the rehabilitation period | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Reinjury Assessment | Monthly questionnaire to assess the rate of reinjury during rehabilitation process | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC) | 19-question form that will contribute to comprehensive data set by evaluating confidence in perfomance | Every month, up to 1 year; assessing for change |
| Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) | Assesses overall health functioning and rehabilitation levels of each participant; required to ensure that a comprehensive assessment of overall functioning is reviewed. Scores range from 20 to 80, with 50 representing the average for the general population, and increases in this number over 50 represent standard deviation, and thus represent slow recovery progress in this study | Every month, up to 1 year; assessing for change |
| Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) | Single question PRO with a rating of 0-100 for each participant to score their current functioning in comparison to their pre-injury level of function |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
100 competitive pre-collegiate or collegiate athletes who have recently suffered from an ACL injury that requires reconstructive surgery
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessi Truett, MA, BCBA | Contact | (850) 916-8570 | jessica.truett@andrewsref.org | |
| Chandler Bridges, MS | Contact | (850) 916-8584 | chandler.bridges@andrewsref.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Adam Anz, MD | Orthopedic Surgeon | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrews Research and Education Foundation | Recruiting | Gulf Breeze | Florida | 32561 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25157180 | Background | Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;48(21):1543-52. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093398. Epub 2014 Aug 25. | |
| 11518272 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 10, 2021 | Oct 6, 2022 | Prot_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Nov 10, 2021 | Oct 6, 2022 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070598 | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007718 | Knee Injuries |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008279 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014054 | Tomography |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ACL reconstruction | Procedure | Surgical procedure to repair damaged or severed anterior cruciate ligament in the knee |
|
| Every month, up to 1 year; assessing for change |
| Bodor M. Quadriceps protects the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res. 2001 Jul;19(4):629-33. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00050-X. |
| 27661391 | Background | Brodke DJ, Saltzman CL, Brodke DS. PROMIS for Orthopaedic Outcomes Measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Nov;24(11):744-749. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00404. |
| Background | Boyle, M. & Galway, B.(n.d.). Evidence-based Clinical Protocols: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury & Reconstruction. Biodex Medical Systems, Inc. |
| 20818198 | Background | Creighton DW, Shrier I, Shultz R, Meeuwisse WH, Matheson GO. Return-to-play in sport: a decision-based model. Clin J Sport Med. 2010 Sep;20(5):379-85. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181f3c0fe. |
| 28702921 | Background | Davies GJ, McCarty E, Provencher M, Manske RC. ACL Return to Sport Guidelines and Criteria. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Sep;10(3):307-314. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9420-9. |
| 18835221 | Background | Gianotti SM, Marshall SW, Hume PA, Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Nov;12(6):622-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Oct 2. |
| 10874221 | Background | Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA, Dick RW, Garrett WE, Garrick JG, Hewett TE, Huston L, Ireland ML, Johnson RJ, Kibler WB, Lephart S, Lewis JL, Lindenfeld TN, Mandelbaum BR, Marchak P, Teitz CC, Wojtys EM. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 May-Jun;8(3):141-50. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200005000-00001. |
| 27162233 | Background | Grindem H, Snyder-Mackler L, Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA. Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(13):804-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096031. Epub 2016 May 9. |
| 27423208 | Background | Gokeler A, Welling W, Zaffagnini S, Seil R, Padua D. Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jan;25(1):192-199. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4246-3. Epub 2016 Jul 16. |
| 33345007 | Background | Jordan MJ, Morris N, Lane M, Barnert J, MacGregor K, Heard M, Robinson S, Herzog W. Monitoring the Return to Sport Transition After ACL Injury: An Alpine Ski Racing Case Study. Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Mar 3;2:12. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.00012. eCollection 2020. |
| 17761605 | Background | Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):1756-69. doi: 10.1177/0363546507307396. Epub 2007 Aug 29. |
| 19925172 | Background | Lundberg M, Styf J, Jansson B. On what patients does the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia fit? Physiother Theory Pract. 2009 Oct;25(7):495-506. doi: 10.3109/09593980802662160. |
| Background | Manske, R. & Reiman, M. (2013). Functional Performance Testing for Power and Return to Sport. Athletic Training. Functional Testing in Human Performance. DOI: 10.1177/1941738113479925 |
| Background | Miller RP, Kori S, Todd D. The Tampa Scale: a measure of kinesiophobia. Clin J Pain. 1991;7(1):51-52. |
| 31448305 | Background | O'Connor CM, Ring D. Correlation of Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) with other Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019 Jul;7(4):303-306. |
| 22382825 | Background | Wilk KE, Macrina LC, Cain EL, Dugas JR, Andrews JR. Recent advances in the rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Mar;42(3):153-71. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3741. Epub 2012 Feb 29. |