Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Pfizer | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare whether being treated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir for 15 days works better than being treated with placebo plus ritonavir to reduce severe symptoms of Long Covid.
Participants will have 5 planned visits to the study clinic over 15 weeks and will take the drug (or placebo) for the first 15 days.
This study uses the term post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), which is another name for "Long Covid."
An exploratory sub-study will investigate the correlation of physical activity and biometric parameters from digital wearable devices with the subjective symptom severity and other patient-reported outcomes in the main study. All participants with iPhone 6S Plus or newer will be offered an opportunity to opt-in to this sub-study. An Apple Watch and Bluetooth-enabled blood pressure monitor will be provided to participants and data will be collected for the duration of the main study to track participants' physiological and behavioral trends in the Paxlovid versus placebo groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir | Experimental | Participants receive nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (Paxlovid) for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15. |
|
| Placebo plus ritonavir | Placebo Comparator | Participants receive placebo to match nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nirmatrelvir | Drug | Two 150 mg tablets taken by mouth every 12 hours |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms at Week 10 According to the Core Symptoms Severity Scale Score | This measure was to evaluate whether there is a difference between treatment with Paxlovid versus placebo on any of the 6 core symptoms of PASC at week 10 (adjusting for patients' baseline levels). Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). | Week 10 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms at Day 15 According to the Core Symptoms Severity Scale Score | This measure was to evaluate whether there is a difference between treatment with Paxlovid versus placebo on any of the 6 core symptoms of PASC at week 10 (adjusting for patients' baseline levels). Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Upinder Singh, MD | Stanford University | Principal Investigator |
| Linda Geng, MD, PhD | Stanford University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford University | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38848477 | Result | Geng LN, Bonilla H, Hedlin H, Jacobson KB, Tian L, Jagannathan P, Yang PC, Subramanian AK, Liang JW, Shen S, Deng Y, Shaw BJ, Botzheim B, Desai M, Pathak D, Jazayeri Y, Thai D, O'Donnell A, Mohaptra S, Leang Z, Reynolds GZM, Brooks EF, Bhatt AS, Shafer RW, Miglis MG, Quach T, Tiwari A, Banerjee A, Lopez RN, De Jesus M, Charnas LR, Utz PJ, Singh U. Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir and Symptoms in Adults With Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The STOP-PASC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Sep 1;184(9):1024-1034. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.2007. | |
| 40810942 |
Not provided
Not provided
Currently, there is no plan for data sharing.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
168 participants were consented and screened. 155 participants were randomized to a study arm.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir | Participants receive nirmatrelvir (two 150 mg tablets) plus ritonavir (one 100 mg capsule) every 12 hours for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15. |
| FG001 | Placebo Plus Ritonavir | Participants receive placebo to match nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (one 100 mg capsule) every 12 hours for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir | Participants receive nirmatrelvir (two 150 mg tablets) plus ritonavir (one 100 mg capsule) every 12 hours for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15. |
| BG001 | Placebo Plus Ritonavir |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms at Week 10 According to the Core Symptoms Severity Scale Score | This measure was to evaluate whether there is a difference between treatment with Paxlovid versus placebo on any of the 6 core symptoms of PASC at week 10 (adjusting for patients' baseline levels). Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). | If participants did not have week 10 data, week 9 data were used when available; otherwise missing data were imputed for statistical analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 10 |
|
15 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir | Participants receive nirmatrelvir (two 150 mg tablets) plus ritonavir (one 100 mg capsule) every 12 hours for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood-loss anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to intervention |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| palpitations | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda N. Geng, MD, PhD | Stanford University | 650-723-4000 | geng@stanford.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP_ICF | Yes | Yes | Yes | Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form | May 5, 2023 | Jun 27, 2024 | Prot_SAP_ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000094024 | Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086382 | COVID-19 |
| D011024 | Pneumonia, Viral |
| D011014 | Pneumonia |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000718217 | nirmatrelvir |
| D019438 | Ritonavir |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013844 | Thiazoles |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D001393 | Azoles |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo |
| Drug |
Two tablets containing placebo matching nirmatrelvir taken by mouth every 12 hours |
|
| Ritonavir | Drug | One 100 mg capsule taken by mouth every 12 hours |
|
| Day 15 |
| Number of Participants Reporting Relief of at Least One Core Symptom for 2 Weeks | Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms. | Baseline through week 10, assessed at week 10 |
| Number of Participants With Overall Alleviation for 2 Weeks | Overall alleviation defined as both:
Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms. | Baseline through week 10, assessed at week 10 |
| Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms of Their Most Bothersome Symptom | This outcome was to assess the severity of the most bothersome symptom experienced by participants. Each symptom was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms) using the Core Symptoms Severity Scale. | Assessed at weeks 5, 10, and 15 |
| Time to Relief of the 6 Core Symptoms | Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none for 2 consecutive weeks (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms. | Up to 15 weeks |
| Time to Relief of the Most Bothersome Symptom | Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none for 2 consecutive weeks (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms. | Up to 15 weeks |
| Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function T-Score | The PROMIS-Physical Function Short Form (SF) assesses difficulty level performing activities of daily living such as doing chores, climbing stairs, walking, and running errands. The assessment consists of 4 items (questions) with each item scored on 5-point Likert scale (higher scores correspond to better physical function). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher physical function T-score indicates better physical function. | Baseline and week 10 |
| Change in PROMIS Fatigue T-Score | The PROMIS Fatigue Score assesses level of fatigue and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 7 items (questions) with each item scored on 5-point Likert scale (higher scores correspond to more fatigue). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher fatigue T-score indicates greater fatigue. | Baseline and week 10 |
| Change in PROMIS Dyspnea-Severity T-Score | The PROMIS-Fatigue Dyspnea-Severity Short Form assesses shortness of breath and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 5 items (questions) scored on 4-point Likert scale with a 7-day recall period (higher scores correspond to worse symptoms). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher Dyspnea-Severity T-score indicates worse symptoms. | Baseline and week 10 |
| Change in PROMIS Cognitive Function Abilities T-Score | The PROMIS-Cognitive Function Abilities Short Form assesses brain fog and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 4 items scored on 5-point Likert scale with a 7-day recall period (higher scores indicate better cognitive function). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher Cognitive Function T-score indicates better cognitive function. | Baseline and week 10 |
| Change in Orthostatic Vitals Test | This outcome measures the difference in supine to standing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). | Baseline and week 10 |
| Change in Heart Rate | This outcome measures the difference in supine to standing heart rate. | Baseline and week 10 |
| Change in 1-minute Sit-to-stand Test | Number of times participant is able to go from sitting (in an armless chair) to standing in 1 minute (sit to stand cycles). | Baseline and week 10 |
| Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Scale Score | The PGIS reflects a participant's perception about the overall severity of their disease symptoms, rated from 1 to 6 (1 = not present; 2 = very mild; 3 = mild; 4 = moderate; 5 = severe; 6 = extremely severe). | Day 15, and weeks 5, 10, and 15 |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Score | The PGIC reflects a participant's perception about the overall efficacy of treatment and their overall status since the start of the treatment, rated from 1 to 7 (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse). | Day 15, and weeks 5, 10, and 15 |
| Summative Severity Score for All Core Symptoms | Core Symptoms Severity Scale Scores for each of the 6 core symptoms were summed to create a summative score. Each core symptom is assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). Summative score range: 0 to 18 (high scores correspond to greater severity). | Weeks 5, 10, and 15 |
| Percentage of Weeks 1-15 With Mild or no Symptoms | Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) is assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). | 15 weeks |
| Result |
| Gunturkun F, Hedlin H, Botzheim B, Deng Y, Bonilla H, Jagannathan P, Quach TC, Kim S, Lin M, O'Riordan G, Tzeng H, Adamowicz L, Demanuele C, Cai X, Yang PC, Singh U, Geng LN. Digital Biometric Measures in Long COVID: A Secondary Analysis of the STOP-PASC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526901. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26901. |
| Lost to follow-up within 15-day treatment period |
|
| Requested to withdraw after 15-day treatment period |
|
Participants receive placebo to match nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (one 100 mg capsule) every 12 hours for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15.
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Index COVID-19 infection date | Index COVID-19 infection was defined as the initial infection associated with subsequent onset of participant's postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Hospitalized for index COVID-19 infection | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Time from index infection to randomization | Mean | Standard Deviation | months |
|
| Total COVID-19 infections | Total COVID-19 infections was the participant-reported total number of COVID-19 infections before enrollment. | Mean | Standard Deviation | infections |
|
| Prior use of SARS-CoV-2 acute medication | Other medications for acute infection include remdesivir, molnupiravir, and bebtelovimab. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Vaccination status at randomization | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| BMI group | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Comorbidities | Participant-reported comorbidities included onset before and after the index COVID-19 infection. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Moderate to severe post-COVID-19 symptoms | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Moderate to severe symptom at baseline | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Placebo Plus Ritonavir | Participants receive placebo to match nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (one 100 mg capsule) every 12 hours for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms at Day 15 According to the Core Symptoms Severity Scale Score | This measure was to evaluate whether there is a difference between treatment with Paxlovid versus placebo on any of the 6 core symptoms of PASC at week 10 (adjusting for patients' baseline levels). Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). | Participants with symptoms data at day 15 | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 15 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Reporting Relief of at Least One Core Symptom for 2 Weeks | Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms. | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to week 10 | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline through week 10, assessed at week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Overall Alleviation for 2 Weeks | Overall alleviation defined as both:
Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms. | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to week 10 | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline through week 10, assessed at week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With No, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Symptoms of Their Most Bothersome Symptom | This outcome was to assess the severity of the most bothersome symptom experienced by participants. Each symptom was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms) using the Core Symptoms Severity Scale. | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to the respective data collection time point. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Assessed at weeks 5, 10, and 15 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time to Relief of the 6 Core Symptoms | Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none for 2 consecutive weeks (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | weeks | Up to 15 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time to Relief of the Most Bothersome Symptom | Relief defined as reduction of severity from moderate to none, or severe to mild/none for 2 consecutive weeks (≥ 2-point Likert score change). Likert score range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | weeks | Up to 15 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function T-Score | The PROMIS-Physical Function Short Form (SF) assesses difficulty level performing activities of daily living such as doing chores, climbing stairs, walking, and running errands. The assessment consists of 4 items (questions) with each item scored on 5-point Likert scale (higher scores correspond to better physical function). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher physical function T-score indicates better physical function. | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to week 10 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | T-score | Baseline and week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in PROMIS Fatigue T-Score | The PROMIS Fatigue Score assesses level of fatigue and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 7 items (questions) with each item scored on 5-point Likert scale (higher scores correspond to more fatigue). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher fatigue T-score indicates greater fatigue. | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to week 10 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | T-score | Baseline and week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in PROMIS Dyspnea-Severity T-Score | The PROMIS-Fatigue Dyspnea-Severity Short Form assesses shortness of breath and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 5 items (questions) scored on 4-point Likert scale with a 7-day recall period (higher scores correspond to worse symptoms). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher Dyspnea-Severity T-score indicates worse symptoms. | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to week 10 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | T-score | Baseline and week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in PROMIS Cognitive Function Abilities T-Score | The PROMIS-Cognitive Function Abilities Short Form assesses brain fog and its interference on daily activities. The assessment consists of 4 items scored on 5-point Likert scale with a 7-day recall period (higher scores indicate better cognitive function). Scores are computed to a T-score metric, where 50 represents the mean for US general adult population and 10 is the standard deviation. A higher Cognitive Function T-score indicates better cognitive function. | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to week 10 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | T-score | Baseline and week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Orthostatic Vitals Test | This outcome measures the difference in supine to standing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to week 10 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg | Baseline and week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Heart Rate | This outcome measures the difference in supine to standing heart rate. | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to week 10 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | bpm | Baseline and week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in 1-minute Sit-to-stand Test | Number of times participant is able to go from sitting (in an armless chair) to standing in 1 minute (sit to stand cycles). | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to week 10 | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cycles | Baseline and week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Scale Score | The PGIS reflects a participant's perception about the overall severity of their disease symptoms, rated from 1 to 6 (1 = not present; 2 = very mild; 3 = mild; 4 = moderate; 5 = severe; 6 = extremely severe). | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to the respective data collection time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Day 15, and weeks 5, 10, and 15 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Score | The PGIC reflects a participant's perception about the overall efficacy of treatment and their overall status since the start of the treatment, rated from 1 to 7 (1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse). | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to the respective data collection time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Day 15, and weeks 5, 10, and 15 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Summative Severity Score for All Core Symptoms | Core Symptoms Severity Scale Scores for each of the 6 core symptoms were summed to create a summative score. Each core symptom is assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). Summative score range: 0 to 18 (high scores correspond to greater severity). | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to the respective data collection time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Weeks 5, 10, and 15 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Weeks 1-15 With Mild or no Symptoms | Each symptom (fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms) is assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (range: 0 to 3; 0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild symptoms; 2 = moderate symptoms; 3 = severe symptoms). | Missing data were imputed for statistical analysis, including for participants who were withdrawn prior to week 15. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | percentage of weeks | 15 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 102 |
| 3 |
| 102 |
| 100 |
| 102 |
| EG001 | Placebo Plus Ritonavir | Participants receive placebo to match nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (one 100 mg capsule) every 12 hours for 15 days, and attend follow-up visits through week 15. | 0 | 53 | 1 | 53 | 48 | 53 |
|
| Forearm fracture | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to intervention |
|
| Melanoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment | Unrelated to intervention |
|
| Hepatitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment | Possibly related to intervention |
|
| tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| malaise | General disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| covid-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| fibrin d dimer increased | Investigations | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| brain fog | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| peripheral sensory neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D007239 |
| Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D018352 | Coronavirus Infections |
| D003333 | Coronaviridae Infections |
| D030341 | Nidovirales Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D000094025 | Post-Infectious Disorders |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D006573 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| Fatigue - moderate symptoms |
|
| Fatigue - severe symptoms |
|
| Brain fog - no symptoms |
|
| Brain fog - mild symptoms |
|
| Brain fog - moderate symptoms |
|
| Brain fog - severe symptoms |
|
| Dyspnea - no symptoms |
|
| Dyspnea - mild symptoms |
|
| Dyspnea - moderate symptoms |
|
| Dyspnea - severe symptoms |
|
| Body aches - no symptoms |
|
| Body aches - mild symptoms |
|
| Body aches - moderate symptoms |
|
| Body aches - severe symptoms |
|
| Gastrointestinal symptoms - no symptoms |
|
| Gastrointestinal symptoms - mild symptoms |
|
| Gastrointestinal symptoms - moderate symptoms |
|
| Gastrointestinal symptoms - severe symptoms |
|
| Cardiovascular symptoms - no symptoms |
|
| Cardiovascular symptoms - mild symptoms |
|
| Cardiovascular symptoms - moderate symptoms |
|
| Cardiovascular symptoms - severe symptoms |
|
| Analysis of brain fog score at day 15 | Regression, odds | Proportional odds regression coefficient Wald test | 0.548 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.21 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.65 | 2.25 | An odds ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of dyspnea score at day 15 | Regression, odds | Proportional odds regression coefficient Wald test | 0.134 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 0.62 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.33 | 1.16 | An odds ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of body aches score at day 15 | Regression, odds | Proportional odds regression coefficient Wald test | 0.241 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.45 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.78 | 2.69 | An odds ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of gastrointestinal symptoms score at day 15 | Regression, odds | Proportional odds regression coefficient Wald test | 0.922 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.03 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.55 | 1.92 | An odds ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of cardiovascular symptoms score at day 15 | Regression, odds | Proportional odds regression coefficient Wald test | 0.032 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 0.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.26 | 0.94 | An odds ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Week 5 - moderate symptoms |
|
| Week 5 - severe symptoms |
|
| Missing symptoms data at week 5 |
|
| Week 10 - no symptoms |
|
| Week 10 - mild symptoms |
|
| Week 10 - moderate symptoms |
|
| Week 10 - severe symptoms |
|
| Missing symptoms data at week 10 |
|
| Week 15 - no symptoms |
|
| Week 15 - mild symptoms |
|
| Week 15 - moderate symptoms |
|
| Week 15 - severe symptoms |
|
| Missing symptoms data at week 15 |
|
| Analysis of severity at week 10 | Regression, odds | Proportional odds regression coefficient Wald test | 0.03 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.99 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.06 | 3.72 | An odds ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of severity at week 15 | Regression, odds | Proportional odds regression coefficient Wald test | 0.01 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 2.42 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.27 | 4.60 | An odds ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Body aches |
|
| Cardiovascular symptoms |
|
| Shortness of breath |
|
| Gastrointestinal symptoms |
|
|
Analysis of data for "Time to relief - brain fog" |
| Cox PH coefficient Wald test |
| 0.259 |
Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. |
| Hazard Ratio (HR) |
| 0.67 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.32 |
| 1.37 |
A hazard ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. |
| Other |
| Analysis of data for "Time to relief - body aches" | Cox PH coefficient Wald test | 0.286 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Hazard Ratio (HR) | 1.61 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.65 | 3.99 | A hazard ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of data for "Time to relief - cardiovascular symptoms" | Cox PH coefficient Wald test | 0.846 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Hazard Ratio (HR) | 0.92 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.38 | 2.24 | A hazard ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of data for "Time to relief - shortness of breath" | Cox PH coefficient Wald test | A hazard ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | 0.410 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Hazard Ratio (HR) | 1.56 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.51 | 4.73 | Other |
| Analysis of data for "Time to relief - gastrointestinal symptoms" | Cox PH coefficient Wald test | 0.880 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Hazard Ratio (HR) | 0.94 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.42 | 2.11 | A hazard ratio < 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a hazard ratio > 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| DBP - baseline |
|
| DBP - change at week 10 |
|
| Analysis of data for change of diastolic blood pressure | Regression, Linear | Linear regression coefficient Wald test | 0.764 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Mean Difference (Net) | -0.68 | 2-Sided | 95 | -5.15 | 3.79 | A mean difference < 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference > 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Week 10 |
|
| Week 15 |
|
| Analysis of week 5 data | Regression, Linear | Linear regression coefficient Wald test | 0.293 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.22 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.20 | 0.64 | A mean difference < 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference > 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of week 10 data | Regression, Linear | Linear regression coefficient Wald test | 0.396 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.19 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.25 | 0.62 | A mean difference < 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference > 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of week 15 data | Regression, Linear | Linear regression coefficient Wald test | 0.064 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.37 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.02 | 0.77 | A mean difference < 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference > 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Week 10 |
|
| Week 15 |
|
| Analysis of week 5 data | Regression, Linear | Linear regression coefficient Wald test | 0.346 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.25 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.78 | 0.28 | A mean difference < 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference > 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of week 10 data | Regression, Linear | Linear regression coefficient Wald test | 0.738 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.10 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.48 | 0.67 | A mean difference < 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference > 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of week 15 data | Regression, Linear | Linear regression coefficient Wald test | 0.578 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.17 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.43 | 0.76 | A mean difference < 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference > 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Week 10 |
|
|
| Week 15 |
|
|
| Analysis of week 10 data | Regression, Linear | Linear regression coefficient Wald test | 0.693 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.24 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.46 | 0.97 | A mean difference < 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference > 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Analysis of week 15 data | Regression, Linear | Linear regression coefficient Wald test | 0.558 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.37 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.87 | 1.61 | A mean difference < 0 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir; a mean difference > 0 favors placebo plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Body Aches |
|
| Cardiovascular symptoms |
|
| Shortness of breath |
|
| Gastrointestinal symptoms |
|
| Post-hoc analysis of brain fog data | Regression, Logistic | Logistic regression coefficient Wald test | 0.01 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 0.50 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.31 | 0.82 | An odds ratio < 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Post-hoc analysis of body aches data | Regression, Logistic | Logistic regression coefficient Wald test | 0.34 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.32 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.74 | 2.33 | An odds ratio < 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Post-hoc analysis of cardiovascular symptoms data | Regression, Logistic | Logistic regression coefficient Wald test | 0.29 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.37 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.76 | 2.48 | An odds ratio < 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Post-hoc analysis of shortness of breath data | Regression, Logistic | Logistic regression coefficient Wald test | 0.35 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.32 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.73 | 2.38 | An odds ratio < 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir. | Other |
| Post-hoc analysis of gastrointestinal symptoms data | Regression, Logistic | Logistic regression coefficient Wald test | 0.25 | Uncorrected p-value. A p-value less than the a priori threshold of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.40 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.79 | 2.47 | An odds ratio < 1 favors placebo plus ritonavir; an odds ratio > 1 favors nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir. | Other |