Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study sought to determine the percentage of normal eyes that followed the ISNT rule by retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and neuroretinal rim thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography (OCT) , and secondarily, whether alternative rules may be more applicable or easily generalized.
Glaucoma is a disease of the optic nerve, which results in structural optic nerve head (ONH) damage and functional visual field (VF) loss. It has increased as a cause of global blindness from 4.4% in 1990 to 6.3% in 2010. Its global prevalence is also increasing from 3.54% or 64.3 million people in 2013 to a projected 111.8 million people by 2040. Detection of structural ONH damage is critical for early diagnosis, because ONH changes usually precede VF loss. Two cornerstone elements of the ONH and peripapillary examination are stereo disc photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements. By analyzing the neuroretinal rim in disc photos of normal subjects, Jonas et al found that the rim width typically exhibited a specific pattern of the inferior (I) rim being the widest, followed by the superior (S) rim, then the nasal (N) rim, and then the temporal (T) rim being the thinnest. This specific neuroretinal rim pattern was later coined by Elliot Werner as the "ISNT rule." Because neuroretinal rim loss is a hallmark feature of glaucoma, patients who deviate from the ISNT rule may need to be watched more closely for glaucoma. The RNFL, on the other hand, has also been shown in histological studies in normal, non-glaucomatous eyes to exhibit a similar pattern of the inferior quadrant being the thickest, followed by the superior, nasal, then temporal quadrant. Since RNFL thinning, particularly in the superior and inferior quadrants, is also a characteristic structural change in glaucoma, deviation from the ISNT rule for RNFL thickness may also be an early indicator of glaucomatous structural change. Therefore, many investigators have sought to determine whether the ISNT rule, either applied to the neuroretinal rim disc photos or to RNFL thickness measurements, is useful in the diagnosis of glaucoma or not. However, the optic disc photo ISNT rule studies are conflicting, with some finding the ISNT rule and its variants clinically useful, while others have not. In contrast, RNFL ISNT rule studies based on OCT findings are in uniform agreement, stating that the ISNT rule and its variants were not helpful in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Some have hypothesized that the ISNT rule is not easily generalizable to the individual, because the initial studies were derived from mean values. Therefore, some of the limitations of the ISNT rule may stem from the fact that it is unclear what percentage of individual normal eyes follow the ISNT rule. Other limitations may arise from the fact that perhaps other rules may be more common in the normal population.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| optical coherence tomography (OCT) | Device | measuring retinal nerve fiber layer and neuroretinal rim thickness |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ISNT rule prevalence in normal population | the percentage of normal eyes that followed the ISNT rule by retinal nerve fiber layer and neuroretinal rim thickness measurements using (OCT) | Baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| variants of ISNT rule | whether alternative rules may be more applicable or easily generalized than the ISNT rule like IS,IST, TSINT rule . | Baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Normal population
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amr M Sayed, M.B.B.Ch. | Contact | +201096083988 | amr_mohamed_sayed3@yahoo.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Abd-Elnasser A Mohamed, PhD | Assiut University | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11815354 | Background | Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;86(2):238-42. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.2.238. | |
| 21453963 | Background | Quigley HA. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1367-77. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61423-7. Epub 2011 Mar 30. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005901 | Glaucoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009798 | Ocular Hypertension |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D041623 | Tomography, Optical Coherence |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D041622 | Tomography, Optical |
| D061848 | Optical Imaging |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 27764086 | Background | Bourne RR, Taylor HR, Flaxman SR, Keeffe J, Leasher J, Naidoo K, Pesudovs K, White RA, Wong TY, Resnikoff S, Jonas JB; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Number of People Blind or Visually Impaired by Glaucoma Worldwide and in World Regions 1990 - 2010: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 20;11(10):e0162229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162229. eCollection 2016. |
| 24974815 | Background | Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Jun 26. |
| 16949445 | Background | Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Anderson DR, Levine RA, Fan J, Cello KE, Quigley HA, Budenz DL, Parrish RK, Kass MA, Gordon MO; Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The association between glaucomatous visual fields and optic nerve head features in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1603-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.061. |
| 10416767 | Background | Broadway DC, Nicolela MT, Drance SM. Optic disk appearances in primary open-angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;43 Suppl 1:S223-43. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(99)00007-7. |
| 10614679 | Background | Jonas JB, Budde WM. Diagnosis and pathogenesis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy: morphological aspects. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000 Jan;19(1):1-40. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(99)00002-6. |
| 3417404 | Background | Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988 Jul;29(7):1151-8. |
| 10025513 | Background | Jonas JB, Budde WM, Panda-Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan-Feb;43(4):293-320. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(98)00049-6. |
| 9003346 | Background | Varma R, Skaf M, Barron E. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology. 1996 Dec;103(12):2114-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30381-3. |
| 10379607 | Background | Dichtl A, Jonas JB, Naumann GO. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in human eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;237(6):474-9. doi: 10.1007/s004170050264. |
| 9930265 | Background | Jonas JB, Budde WM, Lang P. Neuroretinal rim width ratios in morphological glaucoma diagnosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Dec;82(12):1366-71. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.12.1366. |
| 17102005 | Background | Harizman N, Oliveira C, Chiang A, Tello C, Marmor M, Ritch R, Liebmann JM. The ISNT rule and differentiation of normal from glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;124(11):1579-83. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.11.1579. |
| 24844540 | Background | Law SK, Kornmann HL, Nilforushan N, Moghimi S, Caprioli J. Evaluation of the "IS" Rule to Differentiate Glaucomatous Eyes From Normal. J Glaucoma. 2016 Jan;25(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000072. |
| 22365059 | Background | Morgan JE, Bourtsoukli I, Rajkumar KN, Ansari E, Cunliffe IA, North RV, Wild JM. The accuracy of the inferior>superior>nasal>temporal neuroretinal rim area rule for diagnosing glaucomatous optic disc damage. Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):723-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.004. Epub 2012 Feb 24. |
| 26021327 | Background | Dave P, Shah J. Applicability of ISNT and IST rules to the retinal nerve fibre layer using spectral domain optical coherence tomography in early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;99(12):1713-7. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306331. Epub 2015 May 28. |
| 24777047 | Background | Pradhan ZS, Braganza A, Abraham LM. Does the ISNT Rule Apply to the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer? J Glaucoma. 2016 Jan;25(1):e1-4. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000064. |
| 17435693 | Background | Sihota R, Srinivasan G, Dada T, Gupta V, Ghate D, Sharma A. Is the ISNT rule violated in early primary open-angle glaucoma--a scanning laser tomography study. Eye (Lond). 2008 Jun;22(6):819-24. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702798. Epub 2007 Apr 13. |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D014054 | Tomography |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |