Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, multicenter, paired-eye, randomized, subject/evaluator-masked clinical investigation of the experimental EndoCoat OVD versus the control EndoCoat OVD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investigational Healon EndoCoat | Experimental | Eligible subjects to be randomly assigned to receive investigational Healon EndoCoat in one eye and control Healon EndoCoat in fellow eye. |
|
| Control Healon EndoCoat | Active Comparator | Eligible subjects to be randomly assigned to receive investigational Healon EndoCoat in one eye and control Healon EndoCoat in fellow eye. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigational Healon Endocoat | Device | Ophthalmic Viscoelastic device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cumulative IOP Spike Rate From Safety Endpoint | The cumulative IOP spike rate is the proportion of eyes that experienced at least one IOP spike within each arm during the 3-month postoperative period. The status of the cumulative IOP spike is either 'Yes, Spike' or 'No, Non-Spike,' and the results of the cumulative IOP spike rate are presented in percentage. For this outcome measure, subjects have been analyzed as per treated received, which gives investigational OVD of 131 participants and 131 eyes treated; and control OVD of 130 participants and 130 eyes treated. | 3-month postoperative |
| ECC Percent Change From Effectiveness Endpoint | The success criterion for the primary effectiveness endpoint was met (modified ITT Population) as the investigational device (HEALON EndoCoat OVD) demonstrated non-inferiority to the control device (HEALON EndoCoat OVD) with respect to the difference in mean ECC percent change. For this outcome measure, subjects have been analyzed as per planned randomization schema, which gives investigational OVD of 130 participants and 130 eyes randomized; and control OVD of 131 participants and 131 eyes randomized. | 3-month postoperative |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. Clinical Trial | Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Empire Eye & Laser Center | Bakersfield | California | 93309 | United States | ||
| Southern California Eye Physicians and Associates |
Johnson & Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participant Flow table and outcome measures arms are divided by 'investigational OVD, one eye treated with investigational HEALON EndoCoat OVD' vs. 'control OVD, one eye treated with control HEALON EndoCoat OVD'.
A total of 165 subjects were enrolled in the study. Of these, 131 subjects (261 eyes) received the treatment and were included in the analysis.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | OVD Groups | Control OVD: One eye treated with control HEALON EndoCoat OVD Investigational OVD: One eye treated with investigational HEALON EndoCoat OVD |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 1, 2024 | Jun 1, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Control Healon EndoCoat | Device | Ophthalmic Viscoelastic device |
|
| Long Beach |
| California |
| 90805 |
| United States |
| Scott & Christie and Associates | Cranberry Township | Pennsylvania | 16066 | United States |
| Eye Care Specialists | Kingston | Pennsylvania | 18704 | United States |
| Berkeley Eye Institute, P.A. | Houston | Texas | 77027 | United States |
| Focal Point Vision | San Antonio | Texas | 78209 | United States |
| Parkhurst NuVision | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Virginia Eye Consultants | Norfolk | Virginia | 23502 | United States |
| Investigational OVD |
|
| Control OVD |
|
| Completed Investigational OVD |
|
| Completed Control OVD |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Of the 131 treated subjects, data from 100% (131 /131) of the eyes treated with the investigational OVD and 99.2% (129/130) of the eyes treated with the control OVD were available at the final 3-month visit.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Safety Population | Total of 131: 129 contralaterally treated with investigational and control OVDs; 1 bilaterally treated with the investigational OVD; 1 unilaterally treated with the control OVD |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Cumulative IOP Spike Rate From Safety Endpoint | The cumulative IOP spike rate is the proportion of eyes that experienced at least one IOP spike within each arm during the 3-month postoperative period. The status of the cumulative IOP spike is either 'Yes, Spike' or 'No, Non-Spike,' and the results of the cumulative IOP spike rate are presented in percentage. For this outcome measure, subjects have been analyzed as per treated received, which gives investigational OVD of 131 participants and 131 eyes treated; and control OVD of 130 participants and 130 eyes treated. | Percentage cumulative IOP spike rate | Posted | Number | Percentage | 3-month postoperative | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | ECC Percent Change From Effectiveness Endpoint | The success criterion for the primary effectiveness endpoint was met (modified ITT Population) as the investigational device (HEALON EndoCoat OVD) demonstrated non-inferiority to the control device (HEALON EndoCoat OVD) with respect to the difference in mean ECC percent change. For this outcome measure, subjects have been analyzed as per planned randomization schema, which gives investigational OVD of 130 participants and 130 eyes randomized; and control OVD of 131 participants and 131 eyes randomized. | ECC Change in Percentage in Negative number value | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Percentage Change | 3-month postoperative | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
3 months postoperative follow-up
There were a total of 32 AEs.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Investigational OVD | One eye treated with investigational HEALON EndoCoat OVD | 0 | 131 | 14 | 131 | 0 | 131 |
| EG001 | Control OVD | One Eye Treated with control HEALON EndoCoat OVD | 0 | 130 | 17 | 130 | 0 | 130 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increased IOP | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cystoid Macula Edema | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Central Serous Retinopathy | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Retained Lens Material | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Residual Refractive Error | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hospitalization due to chest pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Pall, Dr. | Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision | +1 904 6292289 | bpall@its.jnj.com |
| Prot_002.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 1, 2024 | Jul 8, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002386 | Cataract |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007905 | Lens Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=80 years old |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Eyes |
|
|
|