Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study intends to perform an all-inside and complete tibial tunnel ACL reconstruction technique in 80 patients, and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of the two surgical procedures through follow-up.
This is a prospective randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial study on ACL reconstruction surgery technique. In this study, 80 patients with ACL rupture were recruited according to the enrollment criteria. The recruited patients were randomly divided into groups. The ratio of the control group is 1:1. In this study, 40 patients with ACL rupture in the experimental group will be treated with all-inside reconstruction technique, and 40 patients with ACL rupture in the control group will be treated with complete tibial tunnel technique. All operations will be performed with 4-strand autologous semitendinosus tendon. All fixations will be performed using an adjustable cortical suspensory system. After reconstruction, all subjects will participate in the collection of clinical function scores including Marx Activity score, IKDC score, and clinical evaluation including physical examination, joint laxity, CT and MRI imaging analysis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| All-inside technique | Experimental | Both of the femoral and tibial tunnel will be drilled in a retrograde manner using flip-cutter and femoral and tibial sockets will be created. Graft will be passed from the portal. Adjustable suspensory cortical fixation both on tibial and femoral side will be used. |
|
| Complete tibial tunnel technique | Active Comparator | Femoral tunnel will be drilled in an inside-outside manner using standard technique. Then the tibial tunnel will be drilled completely. Graft will be passed from the tibial tunnel. Adjustable suspensory cortical fixation both on the tibial and femoral side will be used. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Procedure | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with four strand semitendinosus graft |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Signal to Noise Quotient | Graft maturation on MRI using T2 Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) sequence without fat saturation | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in Computed Tomography (CT) imaging of Tunnels | Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Morphological Changes | 1 day, 6 months, 1 year |
| International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) | Patient reported outcome measures of symptoms, sports activity & knee function. 0-100 points with 0 (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsun University | Samsun | Samsun | Turkey (Türkiye) | |||
| Ahmet E. Okutan |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34949188 | Background | Bhimani R, Shahriarirad R, Ranjbar K, Erfani A, Ashkani-Esfahani S. Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 23;16(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02872-x. | |
| 30364847 | Background | Colombet P, Saffarini M, Bouguennec N. Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at a Minimum of 2 Years Using Adjustable Suspensory Fixation in Both the Femur and Tibia: A Prospective Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Oct 22;6(10):2325967118804128. doi: 10.1177/2325967118804128. eCollection 2018 Oct. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070598 | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007718 | Knee Injuries |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059549 | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001178 | Arthroplasty |
| D019637 | Orthopedic Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D019651 | Plastic Surgery Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 1 year |
| Marx Activity Rating Score | Clinical Outcomes | 1 year |
| Side to side difference in anterior tibial translation | Anterior tibial translation measured by (Knee laxity Testing device) KT-1000 Arthrometer | 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year |
| Samsun |
| Turkey (Türkiye) |