Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performances of high-viscosity glass ionomer (GI), glass carbomer (GC), zirconia-reinforced GI (ZIR), and bulk-fill (BF) composite resin restorations.For this purpose, two calibrated operators placed 128 restorations in 30 patients with a mean age of 21 years. The restorations will be evaluated by one examiner at baseline and at 6, 12, 18,24, and 48 months using the modified US Public Health Service criteria. The data will statistically analyzed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| zirconomer | Active Comparator | zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement |
|
| Equia Fil | Active Comparator | High viscosity glass ionomer cement |
|
| glass carbomer | Active Comparator | glass ionomer cement containing nano sized- carbonized particles. |
|
| Tetric-evo ceram bulk fill | Active Comparator | Bulk fill composite resin |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| class I restoration placement | Procedure | zirconomer, glass carbomer, glass ionomer and composite resin class I restorations were placed. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Retention Alpha for at least 90% of the restorations | The primary factor for determining the clinical performance of a restorative material is the retention rate. It represents the survival rates of the restorations after a period of time. According to ADA guidelines, a restorative material should show at leat 90% alpha retention rate after 18 months to be considered as clinically acceptable. The retention is assesed as alpha (retentive restoratation) or charlie (failed restoration). Clinical evaluation is performed to examine if the restoration is in place or has fallen. | 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| marginal adaptation score alpha | It represents the marginal integrity of the restorations. It is scored as alpha (perfect marginal adaptation), bravo (detectable marginal discrepency, clinically acceptable) or charlie (marginal crevice, clinically unacceptable). The examination of marginal adaptation is performed by clinical examination of the restoration with probe. | 24 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hacettepe University | Ankara | Altındağ | 06230 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
randomized-split mouth clinical trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided