Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01DC020316 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) | NIH |
| Vanderbilt University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Older adults who use cochlear implants to address hearing loss show wide variation in benefit. This research investigates the role of normal aging, the health of peripheral and central auditory pathways, and positioning of the cochlear implant electrode array in contributing to this variability. A range of input types from simple auditory signals to spoken sentences is used to examine these questions.
This research aims to understand age-related temporal processing in older cochlear-implant (CI) users. The overall objective is to disentangle the peripheral and central contributions to age-related temporal processing deficits in this population. The central hypothesis is that age-related speech perception deficits are explained by unique contributions from peripheral and central auditory functions, significantly affecting outcomes in older CI users.
The central hypothesis will be tested by determining (1) the extent to which temporal processing of simple signals from single-electrode stimulation can be explained by aging and the peripheral electrode-to-neural interface; (2) the extent to which speech perception can be explained by aging and the peripheral electrode-to-neural interface; (3) the extent and manner in which central auditory compensation overcomes peripheral processing deficits that contribute to age-related performance declines in CI subjects.
Outcome measures collected in this project include behavioral measures of speech and auditory perception and electrophysiological responses.
Also collected are questionnaire-based reports of history of CI device use, cognitive screening measures, and imaging-based information regarding electrode placement in the cochlea.
Better understanding of the locus of age-related temporal processing deficits in this population will aid in developing age-specific guidance regarding CI candidacy, programming, and rehabilitation, thereby improving expected benefit and quality of life.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enrolled Participants - Older adults with cochlear implants | Experimental | Individuals who already use at least one cochlear implant. |
|
| Enrolled Participants - Adults with typical hearing | Other | Control group to provide baseline or comparison data |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic tests of cochlear implant function | Diagnostic Test | Because the subjects in the study will use CI devices that they have already received as part of their standard-of-care treatment, the medical device itself is not an intervention for the purposes of this study. The intervention here will be to carry out diagnostic tests of CI function. This will include perceptual tests of temporal discrimination and speech understanding. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Perceptual forward-masking recovery | Basic measurement of temporal processing - A masker stimulus encountered before a probe/target stimulus can affect the perception of the probe stimulus to a greater/lesser degree depending on their separation in time and their absolute and relative levels. Percent correct discrimination as a function of time separation and level manipulations, as measured from a behavioral response, will be reported. | Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. No required time frame for NH comparison listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Perceptual gap detection thresholds | Basic behavioral measurement of temporal processing - The ability to detect a silent gap within a stimulus typically varies depending on frequency and level characteristics of the stimulus in which the gap is embedded and also with the hearing history and age of the listener. Gap detection threshold is the shortest gap duration that can be reliably detected under a given set of conditions and is typically reported in milliseconds. | Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. No required time frame for NH comparison listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Perceptual duration discrimination thresholds | Basic measurement of temporal processing - Perceptual duration discrimination thresholds summarize a listener's ability to tell apart stimuli that differ in temporal extent. Percent correct discrimination as a function of duration difference, overall stimulus duration, and level manipulations, as measured from a behavioral response, will be reported. | Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. No required time frame for NH comparison listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Perceptual amplitude discrimination thresholds |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) | ECAP amplitude growth function slopes will be used to predict perceptual performance. This measure uses clinically-available software to track the growth in auditory nerve response (peak-to-peak amplitude) as input level is varied from threshold to the maximal level at which the signal is comfortably loud. The slope of input-output function will be measured for each electrode along the electrode array of each CI study participant. Steeper slopes (measured in microvolts/current unit) will be interpreted as indicating better neural health of the associated auditory neurons. |
Not provided
For Cochlear Implant arm:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
For Typical Hearing arm:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew J. Goupell, PhD | University of Maryland, College Park | Principal Investigator |
| Samira B. Anderson, PhD | University of Maryland, College Park | Study Director |
| Sandra Gordon-Salant, PhD | University of Maryland, College Park | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Maryland, College Park | College Park | Maryland | 20742 | United States |
De-identified data that document, support, and validate research findings will be made available when the main findings have been accepted for publication. De-identified data relevant to the project will be disseminated to researchers on and off-campus by request and review of the PI.
After publication, research products from this project will be archived at the Digital Repository at the University of Maryland(DRUM). DRUM is a long-term, open access repository managed and maintained by the University of Maryland Libraries. Researchers and the general public can download data and code files, associated metadata and documentation, and any guidelines for reuse.
Following publication, available for at least seven years.
Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Nov 28, 2023 | Jan 31, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Diagnostic tests of auditory function | Diagnostic Test | The intervention here will be to carry out diagnostic tests of hearing. This will include perceptual tests of temporal discrimination and speech understanding. |
|
Basic measurement of auditory processing - Perceptual amplitude discrimination thresholds summarize a listener's ability to tell apart stimuli that differ in level. Percent correct discrimination as a function of level difference size and average level, as measured from a behavioral response, will be reported.
| Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. No required time frame for NH comparison listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Speech perception | Word discrimination, consonant, vowel, and sentence perception tests. The ability to discriminate between and identify recorded words, phonemic contrasts, and sentences will be assessed behaviorally. Results are reported in terms of percent correct words or phonemes. | Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. No required time frame for NH comparison listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Amplitude modulation detection performance | Measure of ability to perceive amplitude modulation using modulation depth thresholds. Amplitude modulation detection performance summarizes a listener's ability to detect the presence of slower-changing amplitude variations applied to a faster-varying carrier signal. The modulation depth of the resulting combined signal can vary between 0 to 100% of the carrier signal with larger values indicating more extreme amplitude fluctuation. This research reports on the amount of modulation that can be detected as a function of different modulator and carrier frequencies, as well as overall stimulus level, as assessed via behavioral report. | Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. No required time frame for NH comparison listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Time Frame: Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. Not collected from NH listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) forward masking recovery | Electrophysiological measurement of auditory nerve refractory time. This measure will be used to predict perceptual performance. Detection thresholds will be measured as masker and probe inputs are varied among a fixed set of levels and the interval between masker and probe is adjusted in duration. | Time Frame: Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. Not collected from NH listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Electrically or acoustically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) - Wave V amplitude | Wave V from the ABR is a reflection of brainstem/midbrain processing. We will measure Wave V amplitude (microV) as the masker and probe levels and masker-to-probe interval are varied. This will be used to predict perceptual performance. | Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. No required time frame for NH comparison listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Electrically or acoustically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) - Wave V latency | Wave V from the ABR is a reflection of brainstem/midbrain processing. We will measure Wave V latency (ms) as the masker and probe levels and masker-to-probe interval are varied. This will be used to predict perceptual performance. | Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. No required time frame for NH comparison listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Cortical auditory evoked potential - N1 and P2 amplitude | Cortical (N1 and P2) amplitude (microV) in response to sound will be used to predict perceptual performance. This is an obligatory response from the auditory cortex that indicates sound detection. | Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. No required time frame for NH comparison listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| Cortical auditory evoked potential - N1 and P2 latency | Cortical (N1 and P2) latency (ms) in response to sound will be used to predict perceptual performance. This is an obligatory response from the auditory cortex that indicates sound detection. There is evidence that this latency varies as a function of aging. | Post-treatment - after at least 1 year use of a cochlear implant if CI user. No required time frame for NH comparison listeners. This measure will be collected once within a 6-month time period for each participant. |
| ICF_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| D006319 | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D012678 | Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided