Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2022-07799 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | |
| MM2YA-EA01 | Other Identifier | ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group | |
| MM2YA-EA01 | Other Identifier | CTEP | |
| U10CA180820 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial compares cytarabine versus (vs.) cytarabine and venetoclax vs. liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine and venetoclax vs. azacitidine and venetoclax for treating patients who have residual disease after treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Cytarabine is in a class of medications called antimetabolites. It works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells in the body. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine is a drug formulation that delivers daunorubicin and cytarabine in small spheres called liposomes, which may make the drugs safer or more effective. Azacitidine is a drug that interacts with DNA and leads to the activation of tumor suppressor genes, which are genes that help control cell growth. This study may help the study doctors find out if the different drug combinations are equally effective to the usual approach of cytarabine alone while requiring a shorter duration of treatment. To decide if they are better, the study doctors will be looking to see if the study drugs lead to a higher percentage of patients achieving a deeper remission compared to cytarabine alone.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To improve the rate of measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission (CR) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have achieved a MRD positive CR after induction chemotherapy received in a myeloMATCH young adult basket tier-1 protocol.
II. To determine the rate of achieving MRD negative CR after 2 cycles of post-remission therapy with cytarabine vs. cytarabine + venetoclax or liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine (daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome) + venetoclax azacitidine + venetoclax in AML or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who were MRD positive post induction therapy.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the disease-free survival, overall survival in this group of patients.
II. Assess the percentage of patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT).
III. Compare toxicities of each experimental arm with the control arm.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate MRD kinetics by following patients with detectable MRD through tier 2 and beyond.
II. Evaluate longer term outcomes by treatment arm, genomics, MRD outcome, and other features as patients receive additional myeloMATCH therapies to generate testable hypotheses for more precise patient selection for these therapies aimed at improving outcomes.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive cytarabine intravenously (IV) on study. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy on study. Patients may also undergo echocardiogram (ECHO) and/or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) as clinically indicated.
ARM B: Patients receive cytarabine IV and venetoclax orally (PO) on study. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy on study. Patients may also undergo ECHO and/or MUGA as clinically indicated.
ARM C: Patients receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV and venetoclax PO on study. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy on study. Patients may also undergo ECHO and/or MUGA as clinically indicated.
ARM D: Patients receive azacitidine IV or subcutaneously (SC) and venetoclax PO on study. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy on study. Patients may also undergo ECHO and/or MUGA as clinically indicated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARM A (cytarabine) | Active Comparator | Patients receive cytarabine IV on study. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy on study. Patients may also undergo ECHO and/or MUGA as clinically indicated. |
|
| ARM B (cytarabine, venetoclax) | Experimental | Patients receive cytarabine IV and venetoclax PO on study. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy on study. Patients may also undergo ECHO and/or MUGA as clinically indicated. |
|
| ARM C (liposomal daunorubicin-cytarabine, venetoclax) | Experimental | Patients receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV and venetoclax PO on study. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy on study. Patients may also undergo ECHO and/or MUGA as clinically indicated. |
|
| ARM D (azacitidine, venetoclax) | Experimental | Patients receive azacitidine IV or SC and venetoclax PO on study. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy on study. Patients may also undergo ECHO and/or MUGA as clinically indicated. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azacitidine | Drug | Given IV or SC |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission (CR) | Will be centrally evaluated. The MRD negative CR frequency will be compared between each experimental arm and the standard therapy arm using Fisher's exact test with one-sided alpha of 0.10 for each comparison. Test results with one-sided p-value < 0.10 will be considered statistically significant. Multivariable logistic regression modeling will also be used to examine the treatment effect between each experimental arm and the standard therapy arm, adjusting for stratification factors and other possible clinical and biological risk factors. | Following 2 cycles of consolidation (56 days) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival | Estimates, including medians and confidence intervals, will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison between each experimental arm and the standard therapy arm will be conducted using the one-sided log-rank test. Only nominal p-values will be provided. Cox proportional hazards models will also be used to assess the treatment effect, adjusting for stratification factors and other possible clinical and biological risk factors. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient must not be pregnant or breast-feeding due to the potential harm to an unborn fetus and possible risk for adverse events in nursing infants with the treatment regimens being used.
Patients of childbearing potential and/or sexually active patients must not expect to conceive or father children by using an accepted and effective method(s) of contraception or by abstaining from sexual intercourse for the duration of their participation in the study and continue for 6 months after the last dose of daunorubicin + cytarabine liposome, 6 months after the last dose of azacitidine for patients of childbearing potential, 3 months after the last dose of azacitidine for male patients, and for 30 days after the last dose of venetoclax. Patient must also abstain from nursing an infant for 2 weeks after the last dose of daunorubicin + cytarabine liposome and for 1 week after the last dose of azacitidine
Patients must not have FLT3 TKD or ITD mutation. Patients with this mutation, will be excluded from this study because myeloMATCH plans separate studies in tier-2 for those patients
Patient must not be receiving any other investigational agents at the time of randomization
Patient must not have history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to cytarabine, azacitidine, venetoclax or daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome
Patients must not have uncontrolled intercurrent illness including but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, or serious chronic gastrointestinal conditions associated with diarrhea
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ehab L Atallah | ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
NCI is committed to sharing data in accordance with NIH policy. For more details on how clinical trial data is shared, access the link to the NIH data sharing policy page.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy | Procedure | Undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy |
|
| Cytarabine | Drug | Given IV |
|
|
| Echocardiography Test | Procedure | Undergo ECHO |
|
|
| Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin-Cytarabine | Drug | Given IV |
|
|
| Multigated Acquisition Scan | Procedure | Undergo MUGA |
|
|
| Venetoclax | Drug | Given PO |
|
|
| Between randomization and death from any cause, assessed up to 10 years |
| Disease-free survival | Estimates, including medians and confidence intervals, will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison between each experimental arm and the standard therapy arm will be conducted using the one-sided log-rank test. Only nominal p-values will be provided. Cox proportional hazards models will also be used to assess the treatment effect, adjusting for stratification factors and other possible clinical and biological risk factors. | From randomization to relapse or death in remission, assessed up to 10 years |
| Rate of allogeneic transplant | Up to 10 years |
| Incidence of adverse events | Toxicity will be determined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). | Up to 10 years |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015470 | Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007951 | Leukemia, Myeloid |
| D007938 | Leukemia |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001374 | Azacitidine |
| D001706 | Biopsy |
| D003561 | Cytarabine |
| C000629812 | CPX-351 |
| D003630 | Daunorubicin |
| D007267 | Injections |
| D008081 | Liposomes |
| C579720 | venetoclax |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001372 | Aza Compounds |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
| D012263 | Ribonucleosides |
| D003581 | Cytodiagnosis |
| D003584 | Cytological Techniques |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D001087 | Arabinonucleosides |
| D018943 | Anthracyclines |
| D009279 | Naphthacenes |
| D011084 | Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D000617 | Aminoglycosides |
| D006027 | Glycosides |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D004333 | Drug Administration Routes |
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D008567 | Membranes, Artificial |
| D001697 | Biomedical and Dental Materials |
| D004337 | Drug Carriers |
| D004304 | Dosage Forms |
| D004364 | Pharmaceutical Preparations |
| D008420 | Manufactured Materials |
| D013676 | Technology, Industry, and Agriculture |
| D040761 | Biomimetic Materials |
Not provided
Not provided