Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| ID RCB 2021-A03003-38 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Smoking cessation assistance is one of the major issues in prevention policies because the prevalence of smoking remains high in France. With its numerous consultations, an emergency service seems to be an interesting place for setting up and helping with weaning, despite specific working conditions. The study, which is a pilot, is interested in the feasibility and efficacy of the implementation of a STIR (Screening, Treatment Intervention and Referral) protocol, which screening, brief intervention, nicotine replacement therapy and referral to a specialist in order to help the patients in smoking cessation.
Individual randomization as soon as the patient gives his consent and meets the inclusion - non-inclusion criteria.
Control group: delivery of the "tobacco-info-service" brochure titled "Why quit smoking? ", then phone call at 7 days and a month to collect tobacco consumption. Visit for 3 month. Intervention group: STIR protocol (screening, brief intervention, incentive to download the tobacco info service application, delivery of the "tobacco-info-service" brochure, initiation of a nicotine replacement therapy with nicotine patches made by a trained emergency nurse or doctor, then three consultations face-to-face or remotely with a member of the team addictionology at 7 days, 1 and 3 months.
In both groups: collection of the primary endpoint during the M3 visit. For patients who did not come (regardless of the group):
call for collection of the main judgment criterion
Carers will be included and will sign a consent form once the eligibility criteria have been checked and consent has been signed. They will be asked to complete an adherence questionnaire (Likert scale) regarding smoking prevention in emergency departments before the start of the study and after the last patient follow-up has taken place.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental |
| |
| Control group | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STIR PROTOCOL | Other | Screening, STIR protocol (screening, brief intervention, incentive to download the tobacco info service application, delivery of the "tobacco-info-service" brochure, initiation of a nicotine patch made by the trained emergency nurse or doctor) then three consultations face-to-face or remotely with a member of the team addictionology at 7 days, 1 and 3 months. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility and efficacy of a smoking cessation intervention | Composite outcome: Proportion of patients who participated in follow-up consultations at 3 months after going to the emergency room and proportion of patients weaned from smoking at three months in the intervention group, compared to the control group. A patient is said to be weaned if he / she declares having stopped smoking for 7 days 3 months after his / her visit to the emergency room | 3 months after emergency consultation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| proportion of patients who participated in consultations at D7 and M1 | Assessment of the patient circuit | Day 7 and 1 month after emergency consultation |
| description of the procedure (duration of the inclusion) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Care giver inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Anne Laure Philippon, MD | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emergency department Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière | Paris | 75013 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020340 | Tobacco Use Cessation |
| D016540 | Smoking Cessation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Description of the research circuit
| 4 months |
| number of patients who refused to participate | Description of the procedure's barriers | 4 months |
| Number of doctors/paramedics involved, and of staff who performed the follow-up | Description of staff involved | 4 months |
| Feasibility of measuring exhaled carbon monoxide | Proportion of patients with a carbon monoxide measurement expired | 3 months after emergency consultation |
| Correlation of the measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide and declaration of withdrawal | 3 months after emergency consultation |
| Effectiveness of the smoking cessation intervention | Proportion of patients weaned at 7 days and at 1 month assessed, declarative, collected by phone | Day 7 and 1 month after emergency consultation |
| Number of smoked cigarettes | Number of cigarettes smoked daily at 7 days, 1 and 3 months, declarative | Day 7, 1 month and 3 month after emergency consultation |
| Patients' adherence to the intervention | - Questionnaire with Likert scale: In order to measure adherence to the intervention, 13 sentences in favor of the intervention : answers from 1. I strongly disagree to 5 . I completely agree. A higher score mean a better adherence (min: 13, max : 65). - Proportion of patients who completed follow-up consultations at 7 days and one month | 3 month after emergency consultation |
| Emergency teams' adherence to the intervention | Questionnaire with Likert scale: In order to measure adherence to the intervention, 11 sentences in favor of the intervention : answers from 1. I strongly disagree to 5 . I completely agree. A higher score mean a better adherence (min: 11, max : 55). | 3 month after emergency consultation |
| Patients ' adherence to the intervention, according to demographic criteria. | Description of the population according to age, gender, socio-economic characteristics, grounds for appeal | 3 month after emergency |