Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
With a prevalence of about 10% chronic insomnia is a common problem. The standard treatment for insomnia is cognitive behavioral therapy. According to many, the core element within this treatment is sleep restriction. This element has been examined separately in a couple of studies and also appears to be effective in isolation. In the current study the aim is to get more information about the effectiveness of this core element of the treatment. For this reason, a randomized study is conducted to compare sleep restriction with a diary control condition.
The second aim in this study is to determine mechanisms behind treatments. Network intervention analysis will be used to determine which specific symptoms are associated with therapy success. This is the reason that throughout the study weekly and daily measures will be conducted.
The expectations are that:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep restriction treatment | Experimental | In this condition participants receive a behavioral sleep restriction intervention for six weeks |
|
| Sleep monitoring | Placebo Comparator | In this control condition people fill out a sleep diary for six weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sleep restriction treatment | Behavioral | Treatment consists of sleep restriction treatment for insomnia. In this treatment, participants limit their bedtimes to the time they actually sleep. If they sleep most of the time in bed again then bedtimes are slowly built up again. This treatment technique has already been studied in several trials and found to be effective. Mode of delivery is an online booklet, online exercises and weekly telephone support |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Insomnia Severity Index | The Insomnia Severity Index is a seven item-scale scored on a five-point Likert scale (Bastien et al. 2001). The total score ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate more insomnia. | Change from baseline to six weeks post-randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep diary: sleep onset latency | Sleep onset latency is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in minutes (higher scores indicating longer sleep onset latency). | Change from baseline to six-weeks post-randomization |
| Sleep diary: sleep onset latency |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jaap Lancee, PhD | University of Amsterdam | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Amsterdam | Amsterdam | North Holland | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42095130 | Derived | Klau MM, Lancee J, Looman MI, Van Der Maas HLJ, Visser RM, Blanken TF. From night-to-night and from person-to-person: dynamic phenomena of insomnia. Sleep Adv. 2026 Mar 23;7(2):zpag035. doi: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpag035. eCollection 2026. | |
| 41918497 | Derived | Looman MI, Klau MM, Schoenmakers TM, Kamphuis JH, Blanken TF, Lancee J. The Adherence Conundrum of Sleep Restriction Therapy for Insomnia. J Sleep Res. 2026 Apr 1:e70339. doi: 10.1111/jsr.70339. Online ahead of print. |
Not provided
Not provided
Data will be available upon requests
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007319 | Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020919 | Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic |
| D020920 | Dyssomnias |
| D012893 | Sleep Wake Disorders |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized controlled trial where participants are allocated to either a sleep restriction treatment condition or a sleep monitoring control condition. All participants keep a daily sleep diary and fill out weekly questionnaires
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| sleep diary monitoring | Behavioral | As an active control condition people monitor their sleep with a sleep diary (also included in the sleep restriction intervention) |
|
Sleep onset latency is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in minutes (higher scores indicating longer sleep onset latency). |
| Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Sleep diary: wake after sleep onset | Wake after sleep onset is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in minutes (higher scores indicating longer wake after sleep onset). | Change from baseline to six-weeks post-randomization |
| Sleep diary: wake after sleep onset | Wake after sleep onset is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in minutes (higher scores indicating longer wake after sleep onset ) | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Sleep diary: terminal wakefulness | Terminal wakefulness is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in minutes (higher scores indicating longer terminal wakefulness). | Change from baseline to six-weeks post-randomization |
| Sleep diary: terminal wakefulness | Terminal wakefulness is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in minutes (higher scores indicating longer terminal wakefulness). | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Sleep diary: sleep efficiency | Sleep efficiency is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in percentage (higher scores indicating better sleep efficiency). | Change from baseline to six-weeks post-randomization |
| Sleep diary: sleep efficiency | Sleep efficiency is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in percentage (higher scores indicating better sleep efficiency). | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Sleep diary: total sleep time | Total sleep time is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in minutes (higher scores indicating longer total sleep time). | Change from baseline to six-weeks post-randomization |
| Sleep diary: total sleep time | Total sleep time is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in minutes (higher scores indicating longer total sleep time). | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Sleep diary: time in bed | Time in bed is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in minutes (higher scores indicating longer time in bed). | Change from baseline to six-weeks post-randomization |
| Sleep diary: time in bed | Time in bed is assessed with the Carney (2012) consensus sleep diary. This is measured in minutes (higher scores indicating longer time in bed). | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Cognitive arousal | cognitive arousal is measured daily with a visual analogue scale | Change from baseline to six weeks post randomization |
| Somatic arousal | Somatic arousal is measured daily with a visual analogue scale | Change from baseline to six weeks post randomization |
| Current sleepiness | Sleepiness is measured daily with a visual analogue scale | Change from baseline to six weeks post randomization |
| Insomnia Severity | The Insomnia Severity Index is a seven item-scale scored on a five-point Likert scale (Bastien et al. 2001). The total score ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate more insomnia. | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Sleep safety | Sleep safety behaviors are measured with the Dutch translation of the 32-item Sleep-Related Behaviors Questionnaire-SRBQ (Ree & Harvey, 2004). The total score ranges from 0 (no safety behaviors) to 128 (severe safety behaviors). | Change from baseline to six weeks post-randomization |
| Sleep safety | Sleep safety behaviors are measured with the Dutch translation of the 32-item Sleep-Related Behaviors Questionnaire-SRBQ (Ree & Harvey, 2004). The total score ranges from 0 (no safety behaviors) to 128 (severe safety behaviors). | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale | To assess daytime sleepiness the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is used. The ESS consists of 8-items on a 4-point Likert scale (range 0-24) with higher scores indicating more sleepiness. | Change from baseline to six weeks post-randomization |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale | To assess daytime sleepiness the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is used. The ESS consists of 8-items on a 4-point Likert scale (range 0-24) with higher scores indicating more sleepiness. | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Pre-sleep arousal | Sleep-related arousal was measured with the Pre-sleep Arousal Scale (PSAS) (Nicassio et al. 1985). The PSAS consists of 16 items that range from 1 ('not at all') to 5 ('extremely'), higher scores indicating more arousal (range 16-80). | Change from baseline to six weeks post-randomization |
| Pre-sleep arousal | Sleep-related arousal was measured with the Pre-sleep Arousal Scale (PSAS) (Nicassio et al. 1985). The PSAS consists of 16 items that range from 1 ('not at all') to 5 ('extremely'), higher scores indicating more arousal (range 16-80). | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Sleep-bed association | Sleep-bed association is measured with a newly constructed scale of 5 items on a 7-point Likert scale (0-6). Higher scores indicating a stronger sleep-bed association (range 0-30) | Change from baseline to six weeks post-randomization |
| Sleep-bed association | Sleep-bed association is measured with a newly constructed scale of 5 items on a 7-point Likert scale (0-6). Higher scores indicating a stronger sleep-bed association (range 0-30) | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Dysfunctional beliefs | Dysfunctional beliefs about sleep are measured using the 16-item Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS-16) (Morin et al. 2017). Items are scored on an 11-point Likert scale (0-10). Higher scores indicating more dysfunctional beliefs (range 0-160). | Change from baseline to six weeks post-randomization |
| Dysfunctional beliefs | Dysfunctional beliefs about sleep are measured using the 16-item Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS-16) (Morin et al. 2017). Items are scored on an 11-point Likert scale (0-10). Higher scores indicating more dysfunctional beliefs (range 0-160). | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Depression | Depression is measured with the Dutch version of a nine-item depression scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; range 0-27, Cronbach's α = 0.94; Spitzer et al., 1999). Higher scores indicating more depression. | Change from baseline to six weeks post-randomization |
| Depression | Depression is measured with the Dutch version of a nine-item depression scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; range 0-27, Cronbach's α = 0.94; Spitzer et al., 1999). Higher scores indicating more depression. | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Anxiety | Anxiety is measured with the Anxiety section of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A; Cronbach's α = 0.84, seven items on a four-point Likert scale, scores ranging 0-21; Spinhoven et al., 1997). Higher scores indicating more anxiety. | Change from baseline to six weeks post-randomization |
| Anxiety | Anxiety is measured with the Anxiety section of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A; Cronbach's α = 0.84, seven items on a four-point Likert scale, scores ranging 0-21; Spinhoven et al., 1997). Higher scores indicating more anxiety. | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Acceptance | Acceptance is measured with 10-items of the 'flexibiliteits index test'. Items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale (0-6) and higher scores indicate more acceptance (range 0-60). | Change from baseline to six weeks post-randomization |
| Acceptance | Acceptance is measured with 10-items of the 'flexibiliteits index test'. Items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale (0-6) and higher scores indicate more acceptance (range 0-60). | Change from baseline to six-month follow-up (intervention only) |
| Adverse events | Participants asked to report adverse events ("Did anything unpleasant happen to you that was related to your sleep or participation in the trial?" | Six-weeks post-randomization |
| Treatment quality | Treatment quality is rated with a single question 'how do you rate the treatment'. This is rated on an 11-point Likert scale (0-10) with higher scores indicating more satisfaction (intervention only) | Six-weeks post-randomization |
| Rating coach | Coaches are rated with a single question 'how satisfied were you with your coach during the treatment'. This is rated on an 11-point Likert scale (0-10) with higher scores indicating more satisfaction | Six-weeks post-randomization |
| 40122034 | Derived | Looman MI, Blanken TF, Schoenmakers TM, Reesen JE, Effting M, Linnebank FE, van Straten A, Kamphuis JH, Lancee J. Telephone-Guided Sleep Restriction for Insomnia: A Randomized Sleep Diary-Controlled Trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2025;94(3):147-161. doi: 10.1159/000545138. Epub 2025 Mar 21. |
| D001523 |
| Mental Disorders |