Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Massachusetts, Worcester | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Family-involved treatments for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) hold considerable promise to improve engagement and compliance with treatment and improve treatment outcomes. Currently, however, these treatments are time-intensive and difficult to learn and to integrate with on-going clinical treatment. Consistent with the general trend toward briefer treatments, we propose to develop a brief, 3-session, family-involved treatment that can be incorporated into a variety of other AUD treatment modalities. If successful, the treatment may increase the efficiency and effectiveness of AUD treatment.
The overall aim of this treatment development study is to develop an efficacious, brief, family-involved treatment that can be used flexibly in on-going alcohol treatment settings to advance the dissemination of evidence-based treatment. The treatment to be developed and tested in this grant, "B-FIT" (Brief Family-Involved Treatment), builds on the PI's earlier National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)-supported efficacy trials and studies of mechanisms of change in Alcohol Behavioral Couple Therapy (ABCT) and is designed as an add-on to community-based substance abuse treatment-as-usual (TAU). B-FIT uses family involvement to enhance patient treatment adherence and outcomes by improving family functioning and increasing family-provided incentives for treatment adherence and abstinence. Study aims are carefully sequenced to develop the B-FIT approach and to judge its merits through a rigorous set of fidelity analyses, a small-scale clinical trial, and prospective tests of potential active ingredients, mediators, and moderators of treatment response. Specific are to: (1) modify ABCT to make it (a) appropriate for any concerned family member, (b) shorter, (c) focused on key mechanisms of change, (d) appropriate for use as part of an on-going alcohol treatment program, and (e) more efficacious by incorporating behavioral contracting procedures; (2) conduct a small-scale clinical trial of B-FIT; and (3) finalize materials for a larger-scale RCT. To accomplish study aims, a stage 1A successive cohort treatment development approach followed by a stage 1B small randomized clinical trial (RCT) will be completed. In the 1A stage, key interventions in B-FIT will be identified and integrated into the preliminary version of the treatment manual. Then, in the 1B stage B-FIT will be tested in an RCT to determine feasibility and preliminary efficacy. The project includes six phases: (1) focus groups with service providers, patients, and concerned family members (CFMs) of patients to obtain feedback about the B-FIT content and materials; (2) modification of the B-FIT protocol in response to the focus group feedback; (3) clinician training in the B-FIT protocol followed by pilot testing with six patients and their CFMs. Each clinician, patient, and CFM will be debriefed after the treatment to assess the B-FIT intervention. (4) Further modifications to the B-FIT materials in response to feedback from the pilot study as well as a second set of focus groups used to obtain feedback on the B-FIT written materials in terms of readability, relevance, and ease of use. (5) Structured didactic and experiential training for clinicians on the B-FIT treatment. (6) A small-scale, randomized clinical trial of TAU versus B-FIT + TAU will be conducted with 60 patients and their CFMs to (a) test the feasibility of B-FIT and impact on patient treatment retention, (b) obtain effect size estimates for pre-post changes in drinking, CFM, and family functioning; (c) assess therapist fidelity; (d) measure hypothesized active ingredients in the treatment; and (e) conduct initial moderator analyses. In parallel with phases 1-5 all measures and study procedures will be finalized. Three-month follow-up data will be collected as part of the clinical trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder (B-FIT_ | Experimental | Up to 3 sessions of family-involved treatment for patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and a family member: Session 1; psychoeducation; increasing supportive behaviors, enhancing positive activities. Session 2: Improving communication; recovery contracts. Session 3: Review of session1 & 2 interventions; continue with communication skills. |
|
| Treatment as Usual (TAU | Active Comparator | Treatment as usual in inpatient AUD rehabilitation program, including daily therapy groups, individual counseling, and health and recreational activities. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder | Behavioral | Up to 3 sessions of counseling involving a patient with alcohol use disorder and a concerned family member |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Form-90 Timeline Followback Interview | The Timeline Followback (TLFB) Interview is one section of a larger interview designed to measures outcomes of alcohol treatment. An interviewer uses a calendar to elicit information from the participant about the amount of alcohol consumed on each day within the time period of interest (3 months prior to the interview at baseline; 4 months from baseline at the follow-up interview). From the daily drinking data on the calendar, the interviewer counts the number of days abstinent, and divides that by the total number of days covered in the interview to generate a single value - proportion of days abstinent. This value can range from 0-100. A family member also was interviewed to provide the same data at follow-up. If follow-up data were unavailable from the participant, the family member report was used. Proportion of days abstinent is the outcome variable of interest. Higher values reflect a more positive outcome. | 120 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC-2R) | The DrInC-2R is a 45-item self-report of negative consequences of drinking. Respondents report how often each of 45 different potential negative consequences of drinking has occurred, using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (almost daily). Higher scores reflect a higher number and frequency of negative consequences. Total scores can range from 0-135. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria, Patient:
Inclusion Criteria, Family:
Exclusion Criteria, Patient:
Exclusion Criteria, Family:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara S McCrady, PhD | University of New Mexico | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36931829 | Derived | McCrady BS, Tonigan JS, Fink BC, Chavez R, Martinez AD, Borders A, Fokas K, Epstein EE. A randomized pilot trial of brief family-involved treatment for alcohol use disorder: Treatment engagement and outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Nov;37(7):853-862. doi: 10.1037/adb0000912. Epub 2023 Mar 16. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were recruited from a publicly funded inpatient substance use disorder treatment program.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder (B-FIT_ | Up to 3 sessions of family-involved treatment for patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and a family member: Session 1; psychoeducation; increasing supportive behaviors, enhancing positive activities. Session 2: Improving communication; recovery contracts. Session 3: Review of session1 & 2 interventions; continue with communication skills. Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder: Up to 3 sessions of counseling involving a patient with alcohol use disorder and a concerned family member |
| FG001 | Treatment as Usual (TAU | Treatment as usual in inpatient AUD rehabilitation program, including daily therapy groups, individual counseling, and health and recreational activities. Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder: Up to 3 sessions of counseling involving a patient with alcohol use disorder and a concerned family member |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder (B-FIT_ | Up to 3 sessions of family-involved treatment for patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and a family member: Session 1; psychoeducation; increasing supportive behaviors, enhancing positive activities. Session 2: Improving communication; recovery contracts. Session 3: Review of session1 & 2 interventions; continue with communication skills. Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder: Up to 3 sessions of counseling involving a patient with alcohol use disorder and a concerned family member |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Form-90 Timeline Followback Interview | The Timeline Followback (TLFB) Interview is one section of a larger interview designed to measures outcomes of alcohol treatment. An interviewer uses a calendar to elicit information from the participant about the amount of alcohol consumed on each day within the time period of interest (3 months prior to the interview at baseline; 4 months from baseline at the follow-up interview). From the daily drinking data on the calendar, the interviewer counts the number of days abstinent, and divides that by the total number of days covered in the interview to generate a single value - proportion of days abstinent. This value can range from 0-100. A family member also was interviewed to provide the same data at follow-up. If follow-up data were unavailable from the participant, the family member report was used. Proportion of days abstinent is the outcome variable of interest. Higher values reflect a more positive outcome. | Report of proportion days abstinent based on combined reports of patients and a significant other. Data were not available for 4 participants in the B-FIT condition, and 5 participants in the TAU condition, resulting in a follow-up sample of 14 in B-FIT and 12 in TAU. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | proportion of days abstinent | 120 days |
4 months
No adverse events noted
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder (B-FIT_ | Up to 3 sessions of family-involved treatment for patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and a family member: Session 1; psychoeducation; increasing supportive behaviors, enhancing positive activities. Session 2: Improving communication; recovery contracts. Session 3: Review of session1 & 2 interventions; continue with communication skills. Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder: Up to 3 sessions of counseling involving a patient with alcohol use disorder and a concerned family member |
Not provided
Not provided
Difficulties in establishing a site for recruitment, recruitment challenges, scheduling of baseline assessments and treatment sessions with family members, and large numbers of patients at the treatment facility leaving against medical advice, all resulted in a smaller number of participants than planned.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Barbara McCrady | University of New Mexico | 505-925-2388 | bmccrady@unm.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 12, 2017 | Jan 24, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000437 | Alcoholism |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019973 | Alcohol-Related Disorders |
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000431 | Ethanol |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Patients randomly assigned, prospectively, to one of two study arms.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 4 months |
| Family Environment Scale (FES), Conflict Subscale | The Conflict subscale of the FES is a measure the amount of openly expressed anger and conflict among family members. Respondents answer "true" or "false" to each of the nine items on the scale. After the nine items are totaled, the score is converted to a standard score, which ranges from 33-80, based on the norms in the manual. Higher scores indicate more perceived anger and conflict in the family. The Conflict (and Cohesion) were the only FES subscales administered. | 4 months |
| Family Environment Scale (FES) - Cohesion Subscale | The Cohesion subscale of the FES is a measure of the respondent's perception of the degree of commitment, help, and support family members provide for one another. Respondents answer "true" or "false" to each of the nine items on the scale. After the nine items are totaled, the score is converted to a standard score, which ranges from 4-65 based on the norms in the manual. Higher scores indicate more perceived cohesion in the family. The Cohesion (and Conflict) subscales were the only subscales from the FES. | 4 months |
| BG001 | Treatment as Usual (TAU | Treatment as usual in inpatient AUD rehabilitation program, including daily therapy groups, individual counseling, and health and recreational activities. Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder: Up to 3 sessions of counseling involving a patient with alcohol use disorder and a concerned family member |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) | The AUDIT is a 10-item questionnaire designed to screen for alcohol use disorder. It was administered by interview for the current study but can also be used as a self-report measure. Each item is scored on a 0-4 scale, with scores ranging from 0-40. Questions query alcohol use, symptoms of dependence on alcohol, and negative consequences from alcohol consumption. All items are summed to create a total score. A higher score indicates a more severe alcohol use disorder. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Timeline Followback Interview | The TimeLine FollowBack (TLFB) is an interviewer collected measure, for which the participant reports the number of standard drinks of alcohol consumed on each day during the period of interest. The total number of days on which the participant reports abstinence is counted and divided by the total number of days in the period queried, resulting in the proportion of days abstinent, which can range from 0-1.0. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Proportion of days abstinent |
|
| Family Environment Scale - conflict subscale | The Conflict subscale from the Family Environment Scale (FES) measures the amount of openly expressed anger and conflict among family members. This self-report subscale (and the cohesion scale) were the only FES subscales administered. Raw scores are converted to standardized scores based on the FES scoring manual. Standardized scores for the Conflict scale range from 4-65. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale |
|
| Family Environment Scale - cohesion subscale | The Cohesion subscale from the Family Environment Scale (FES) measures the degree of commitment, help, and support family members provide for one another. This self-report subscale (and the conflict scale) were the only FES subscales administered. Raw scores are converted to standardized scores based on the FES scoring manual. Standardized scores for the Cohesion scale range from 33-80. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder (B-FIT_ | Up to 3 sessions of family-involved treatment for patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and a family member: Session 1; psychoeducation; increasing supportive behaviors, enhancing positive activities. Session 2: Improving communication; recovery contracts. Session 3: Review of session1 & 2 interventions; continue with communication skills. Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder: Up to 3 sessions of counseling involving a patient with alcohol use disorder and a concerned family member |
| OG001 | Treatment as Usual (TAU | Treatment as usual in inpatient AUD rehabilitation program, including daily therapy groups, individual counseling, and health and recreational activities. Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder: Up to 3 sessions of counseling involving a patient with alcohol use disorder and a concerned family member |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC-2R) | The DrInC-2R is a 45-item self-report of negative consequences of drinking. Respondents report how often each of 45 different potential negative consequences of drinking has occurred, using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (almost daily). Higher scores reflect a higher number and frequency of negative consequences. Total scores can range from 0-135. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 4 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Family Environment Scale (FES), Conflict Subscale | The Conflict subscale of the FES is a measure the amount of openly expressed anger and conflict among family members. Respondents answer "true" or "false" to each of the nine items on the scale. After the nine items are totaled, the score is converted to a standard score, which ranges from 33-80, based on the norms in the manual. Higher scores indicate more perceived anger and conflict in the family. The Conflict (and Cohesion) were the only FES subscales administered. | Participants who completed the measure (11/18 in B-FIT) (11/17 in TAU) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 4 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Family Environment Scale (FES) - Cohesion Subscale | The Cohesion subscale of the FES is a measure of the respondent's perception of the degree of commitment, help, and support family members provide for one another. Respondents answer "true" or "false" to each of the nine items on the scale. After the nine items are totaled, the score is converted to a standard score, which ranges from 4-65 based on the norms in the manual. Higher scores indicate more perceived cohesion in the family. The Cohesion (and Conflict) subscales were the only subscales from the FES. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 4 months |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 18 |
| 0 |
| 18 |
| 0 |
| 18 |
| EG001 | Treatment as Usual (TAU | Treatment as usual in inpatient AUD rehabilitation program, including daily therapy groups, individual counseling, and health and recreational activities. Brief Family-Involved Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder: Up to 3 sessions of counseling involving a patient with alcohol use disorder and a concerned family member | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| 0.19 |
| 2-Sided |
| Superiority |
Given the small sample size, we relied more heavily on effect size calculations (Hedges g adjusted for small sample bias). |
Hedges g = .04; SE = .42 |