Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is designed as a prospective, real world registry study that compare the safety and efficacy of the different construction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy.
The patient was admitted to the hospital, and at the time of physical examination, the following conditions were met: 18 years old ≤ age ≤ 80 years old; preoperative ECOG performance status score 0/1; non-pregnant or lactating women; no serious mental illness; no serious respiratory disease; No severe hepatic and renal insufficiency; no history of unstable angina pectoris and myocardial infarction within 6 months; no history of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage within 6 months, except for old cavity infarction; no history of continuous glucocorticoid therapy (local Except for applications); pulmonary function test showed FEV1 ≥ 50% of the predicted value. The patient did not participate in other clinical studies (within 6 months).
gastric adenocarcinoma was diagnosed by endoscopic examination and histopathological biopsy of the patient's primary lesion, including: papillary adenocarcinoma, tubular adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, poorly adherent carcinoma (including signet ring cell carcinoma and other types), Mixed adenocarcinoma, etc. In qualified units, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is recommended. The tumor is located in the upper part of the stomach or at the esophagogastric junction (tumor diameter is less than 4cm, and the length of invasion of the esophagus is less than 2cm);
Enhanced CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis was performed on the patient. For upper gastric cancer, no tumor invading the muscular layer, subserosal layer or serosa layer was found, and no distant metastasis occurred; for esophagogastric junction cancer, no distant metastasis occurred;
The patient has a clear diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma, and it is expected that proximal gastrectomy and lymph node dissection can be performed to obtain an R0 surgical result. .
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double tract reconstruction | Double tract reconstruction would be applied after proximal gastrectomy |
| |
| Gastric conduit reconstruction | Gastric conduit reconstruction would be applied after proximal gastrectomy |
| |
| Other reconstructions | Other reconstructions except for double tract and gastric conduit reconstructions would be applied after proximal gastrectomy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double tract reconstruction | Procedure | Double tract reconstruction would be applied after radical proximal gastrectomy. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reflux esophagitis incidence 1 year after surgery | Reflux esophagitis refers to esophageal erosions and/or esophageal ulcers caused by the reflux of esophageal contents into the esophagus or above (oral mouth, throat, lungs) causing complaints of discomfort and endoscopic manifestations of esophageal mucosal defects. | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Morbidity after surgery | Take the total number of patients receiving surgical treatment as the denominator, and the number of patients with intraoperative/postoperative early and late complications during any one and follow-up as the numerator to calculate the proportion; | 30 days |
| Body weight(kg) after surgery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a prospective, multi-center, open, observational, real-world registry study, prospectively and consecutively enrolling patients undergoing proximal gastric surgery in several important gastric cancer across the country. This study emphasizes the continuity of enrolled patients and the breadth of data sources to reflect the real clinical situation. This study plans to include about 10 centers across the country, and plans to enroll consecutive patients who will undergo radical proximal gastrectomy within 2 years. It is expected that a total of 600 prospective registry cases will be included.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University | Recruiting | Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | 200032 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Gastric conduit reconstruction | Procedure | Gastric conduit reconstructionn would be applied after radical proximal gastrectomy. |
|
| Other reconstructions | Procedure | Other reconstructions except for double tract and gastric conduit reconstructions would be applied after radical proximal gastrectomy. |
|
Body weight(kg)would be monitored during follow-up after surgery. |
| 12 months |
| Albumin(g/L) after surgery | Albumin(g/L) would be monitored during follow-up after surgery. | 12 months |
| Hemoglobin(g/L) after surgery | Hemoglobin(g/L) would be monitored during follow-up after surgery. | 12 months |
| 3-year relapse free survival rate | The time between the date of surgery as the starting point and the date of tumor recurrence as the ending point (or the date of death due to tumor cause when the exact date of tumor recurrence is not known). When neither death nor tumor recurrence was observed at follow-up, the final date of confirmation of recurrence-free survival (final recurrence-free survival confirmation date: the last of the date of the outpatient visit or the date of the examination received) was used. | 3 years |
| Mortality after surgery | Taking the total number of patients receiving surgical treatment as the denominator, and observing any of the following patients as the numerator, the ratio calculated as the surgical death ratio:
| 30 days |