Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ICON plc | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) for the treatment of adult Japanese subjects with a de novo symptomatic calcified occlusive atherosclerotic lesion in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or popliteal (POP) artery, which would be otherwise ineligible for endovascular therapy due to risk of complication. Study objective is to collect safety and effectiveness data to support potential commercialization of the peripheral OAS device in Japan.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) | Experimental | Treatment with Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (CSI) Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) followed by Percutaneous Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA) pre-dilation and Medtronic IN.PACT™ Admiral™ Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) | Device | Treatment with Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) followed by Percutaneous Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA), pre-dilation and Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) - Medtronic IN.PACT™ Admiral™ |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With Acute Device Success | The percentage of subjects with the following, post-procedure:
| At the end of the procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Lesion Stenosis | The percentage changes in diameter stenosis of the target lesion at each stage of the procedure: Baseline, Post OAD, Post POBA and Post DCB [Angiographic Core Lab assessed]. | Baseline, Post OAD, Post POBA |
| Acute Technical Success |
Not provided
General Inclusion Criteria (≤30 Days from Clinical Trial Treatment):
General Exclusion Criteria (≤30 Days from Clinical Trial Treatment):
Clinical Trial Treatment Inclusion:
Clinical Trial Treatment Exclusion:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hiroyoshi Yokoi, MD | International University of Health and Welfare, Japan | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tokyo bay Ichikawa | Urayasu | Chiba | Japan | |||
| Matsuyama Red Cross |
The 14 subjects enrolled in a roll-in cohort, were conducted as part of the site initiation phase to allow operating investigators for procedural training with the investigational device. These roll-in subjects were not included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) and were not part of the reported results in Participant Flow, Baseline Characteristics, Outcome Measures, or Adverse Events modules, as predefined in the statistical analysis plan.
81 subjects were enrolled at 12 Japanese sites between 10January2023 and 19March2024 with 14 subjects in roll-in cohort and 67 in full analysis set (FAS). Subjects were considered to enrolled in study at time point of Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) guide wire entered body and became part of ITT population (N=67). 66 subjects became mITT population,1could not confirm calcification due to insufficient imaging. All 14 roll-in subjects were analyzed separately from enrolled population.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Analysis Cohort [Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS)] | Treatment with Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (CSI) Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) followed by Percutaneous Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA) pre-dilation and Medtronic IN.PACT™ Admiral™ Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS): Treatment with Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) followed by Percutaneous Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA), pre-dilation and Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) - Medtronic IN.PACT™ Admiral™ |
| FG001 | Roll-in Cohort [Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System(OAS)] | Roll-in subjects were initial cases by the investigator enrolled to ensure proper device training, and procedural and data collection adherence. Roll-in subjects were consented, treated, and followed per protocol. Roll-in subject data was reported and analyzed separately from the Analysis Cohort. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Analysis Cohort[Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System(OAS)] | Treatment with Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (CSI) Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) followed by Percutaneous Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA) pre-dilation and Medtronic IN.PACT™ Admiral™ Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS): Treatment with Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) followed by Percutaneous Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA), pre-dilation and Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) - Medtronic IN.PACT™ Admiral™ |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Acute Device Success | The percentage of subjects with the following, post-procedure:
| The mITT population set included all enrolled subjects who have been treated with the OAD on a target lesion that has met Independent Physician Review, regardless of deviations from the protocol. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At the end of the procedure |
|
6 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Analysis Cohort[Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System(OAS)] | Treatment with Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (CSI) Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) followed by Percutaneous Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA) pre-dilation and Medtronic IN.PACT™ Admiral™ Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS): Treatment with Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) followed by Percutaneous Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA), pre-dilation and Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) - Medtronic IN.PACT™ Admiral™ |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral artery slow flow | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ikuko Kishimoto, Principal Clinical Scientist | Abbott Vascular | 651.756.4878 | ikuko.kishimoto@abbott.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 17, 2023 | Aug 18, 2025 | Prot_002.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | May 22, 2024 | Aug 18, 2025 | SAP_003.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058729 | Peripheral Arterial Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050197 | Atherosclerosis |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Acute technical success defined per the Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC) definition of achievement of a final residual stenosis <30% for stented and <50% for non-stented subjects by angiography at the end of the procedure [Angiographic Core Lab assessed] without severe angiographic complications defined as severe dissections (D-F), perforation, or distal emboli requiring additional treatment during the procedure [CEC adjudicated]. |
| At the end of the procedure |
| Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) Device Success | DCB Device Success defined as the ability to achieve successful delivery and deployment of all DCB to the target lesion as described per the Instructions for Use (IFU) within 3 minutes of insertion without removal and use of an additional device. | Within 3 minutes of insertion of DCB |
| Target Vessel Patency | Target Vessel Patency is a binary composite endpoint comprised of:
The vessel is considered patent if both criteria are met at the time of assessment. | Up to 6 months |
| Rate of Severe Angiographic Complications | Rate of severe angiographic complications defined as severe dissections (D-F), perforation, or distal emboli requiring additional treatment during the procedure [CEC adjudicated] | At the end of the procedure |
| Acute Procedural Success | Acute procedural success is defined as both acute technical success and absence of death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), acute onset of limb ischemia, index bypass graft or treated segment thrombosis, and/or need for urgent/emergent vascular surgery within 72 hours of the clinical trial treatment [CEC adjudicated]. | 72 hours after index procedure |
| Rate of Major Adverse Event (MAE) | Major Adverse Event (MAE) rate at 30 days and 6 months (CEC adjudicated) was defined as:
| 30 days and 6 months |
| Change of Rutherford Classification (ITT Population) | Rutherford Classification; Class 0: Asymptomatic; no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease. Class 1: Mild Claudication; there is no limitation with ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking several blocks, climbing stairs). Limiting symptoms may occur with marked exertion (e.g., strenuous, rapid or prolonged exertion at work or recreation). Class 2: Moderate Claudication; there is a slight limitation of ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking uphill, or more than two level blocks, or climbing stairs rapidly). Subject is comfortable at rest. Class 3: Severe Claudication; there is marked limitation of ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking 1-2 level blocks or climbing one flight of stairs). Subject is comfortable at rest. Class 4: Ischemic rest pain. Class 5: Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia. Class 6: Major tissue loss extending above transmetatarsal level; functional foot no longer salvageable. | Baseline, 30 days and 6 months |
| Change of Rutherford Classification (mITT Population) | Rutherford Classification; Class 0: Asymptomatic; no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease. Class 1: Mild Claudication; there is no limitation with ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking several blocks, climbing stairs). Limiting symptoms may occur with marked exertion (e.g., strenuous, rapid or prolonged exertion at work or recreation). Class 2: Moderate Claudication; there is a slight limitation of ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking uphill, or more than two level blocks, or climbing stairs rapidly). Subject is comfortable at rest. Class 3: Severe Claudication; there is marked limitation of ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking 1-2 level blocks or climbing one flight of stairs). Subject is comfortable at rest. Class 4: Ischemic rest pain. Class 5: Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia. Class 6: Major tissue loss extending above transmetatarsal level; functional foot no longer salvageable. | Baseline, 30 days and 6 months |
| Change in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) | The Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) is a simple, non-invasive test used to assess peripheral artery disease (PAD). It compares the blood pressure measured at the ankle with the blood pressure measured at the arm (brachial artery). | Baseline (within 30 days of the clinical treatment), and Post Procedure (after the clinical trial treatment prior to discharge: post procedure ABI was collected on average 1.1 days post clinical trial treatment) |
| Matsuyama |
| Ehime |
| Japan |
| Fukuoka Sannou | Sawara | Fukuoka | Japan |
| Iwaki-City Medical Center | Iwaki | Fukushima | Japan |
| Shonan Kamakura General Hospital | Kamakura | Kanagawa | Japan |
| Kyoto Katsura Hospital | Nishikyo-ku | Kyoto | Japan |
| Sendai Kousei Hospital | Sendai | Miyagi | Japan |
| Nara Medical University | Kashihara | Nara | Japan |
| Morinomiya | Joto | Osaka | Japan |
| Ageo Central Hospital | Ageo | Saitama | Japan |
| Kasukabe Central (Chu-o-) | Kasukabe | Saitama | Japan |
| Daini Osaka Police Hospital | Osaka | Japan |
| BG001 | Roll-in Cohort [Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System(OAS)] | Roll-in subjects were initial cases by the investigator enrolled to ensure proper device training, and procedural and data collection adherence. Roll-in subjects were consented, treated, and followed per protocol. Roll-in subject data was reported and analyzed separately from the Analysis Cohort. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Body mass index | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m² |
|
| Rutherford classification | Rutherford Classification: Class 0 : Asymptomatic; no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease. Class 1: Mild Claudication; there is no limitation with ordinary physical activities. Class 2: Moderate Claudication; there is a slight limitation of ordinary physical activities. Class 3: Severe Claudication; there is marked limitation of ordinary physical activities. Class 4: Ischemic rest pain. Class5:Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia. Class6: Major tissue loss extending above transmetatarsal level; functional foot no longer salvageable. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Serum Creatinine | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/dl |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Lesion Stenosis | The percentage changes in diameter stenosis of the target lesion at each stage of the procedure: Baseline, Post OAD, Post POBA and Post DCB [Angiographic Core Lab assessed]. | The ITT population included all enrolled 67 subjects who have been treated with the OAD regardless of deviations from the protocol. The mITT population set included all enrolled subjects who have been treated with the OAD on a target lesion that has met Independent Physician Review, regardless of deviations from the protocol. Of 67 enrolled subjects, one could not confirm calcification due to insufficient imaging, resulting in mITT analysis population becoming 66 subjects | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of stenosis | Baseline, Post OAD, Post POBA |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acute Technical Success | Acute technical success defined per the Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC) definition of achievement of a final residual stenosis <30% for stented and <50% for non-stented subjects by angiography at the end of the procedure [Angiographic Core Lab assessed] without severe angiographic complications defined as severe dissections (D-F), perforation, or distal emboli requiring additional treatment during the procedure [CEC adjudicated]. | The ITT population included all enrolled 67 subjects who have been treated with the OAD regardless of deviations from the protocol. The mITT population set included all enrolled subjects who have been treated with the OAD on a target lesion that has met Independent Physician Review, regardless of deviations from the protocol. Of enrolled 67 subjects, one could not confirm calcification due to insufficient imaging, resulting in mITT analysis population becoming 66 subjects. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At the end of the procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) Device Success | DCB Device Success defined as the ability to achieve successful delivery and deployment of all DCB to the target lesion as described per the Instructions for Use (IFU) within 3 minutes of insertion without removal and use of an additional device. | The ITT population included all enrolled 67 subjects who have been treated with the OAD regardless of deviations from the protocol. The mITT population set included all enrolled subjects who have been treated with the OAD on a target lesion that has met Independent Physician Review, regardless of deviations from the protocol. Of 67 enrolled subjects, one could not confirm calcification due to insufficient imaging, resulting in mITT analysis population becoming 66 subjects. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Within 3 minutes of insertion of DCB |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Target Vessel Patency | Target Vessel Patency is a binary composite endpoint comprised of:
The vessel is considered patent if both criteria are met at the time of assessment. | The ITT population included all enrolled 67 subjects who have been treated with the OAD regardless of deviations from the protocol. The mITT population set included all enrolled subjects who have been treated with the OAD on a target lesion that has met Independent Physician Review, regardless of deviations from the protocol. Of 67 enrolled subjects, one could not confirm calcification due to insufficient imaging, resulting in mITT analysis population becoming 66 subjects. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Up to 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Rate of Severe Angiographic Complications | Rate of severe angiographic complications defined as severe dissections (D-F), perforation, or distal emboli requiring additional treatment during the procedure [CEC adjudicated] | The FAS population included all subjects enrolled into the trial regardless of treatment with the OAD or deviations from the protocol. The mITT population set included all enrolled subjects who have been treated with the OAD on a target lesion that has met Independent Physician Review, regardless of deviations from the protocol. Of 67 enrolled subjects, one could not confirm calcification due to insufficient imaging, resulting in mITT analysis population becoming 66 subjects | Posted | Number | participants | At the end of the procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acute Procedural Success | Acute procedural success is defined as both acute technical success and absence of death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), acute onset of limb ischemia, index bypass graft or treated segment thrombosis, and/or need for urgent/emergent vascular surgery within 72 hours of the clinical trial treatment [CEC adjudicated]. | The FAS population included all subjects enrolled into the trial regardless of treatment with the OAD or deviations from the protocol. The mITT population set included all enrolled subjects who have been treated with the OAD on a target lesion that has met Independent Physician Review, regardless of deviations from the protocol. Of 67 enrolled subjects, one could not confirm calcification due to insufficient imaging, resulting in mITT analysis population becoming 66 subjects. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 72 hours after index procedure |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Rate of Major Adverse Event (MAE) | Major Adverse Event (MAE) rate at 30 days and 6 months (CEC adjudicated) was defined as:
| The FAS population included all subjects enrolled into the trial regardless of treatment with the OAD or deviations from the protocol. The mITT population set included all enrolled subjects who have been treated with the OAD on a target lesion that has met Independent Physician Review, regardless of deviations from the protocol. Of 67 enrolled subjects, one could not confirm calcification due to insufficient imaging, resulting in mITT analysis population becoming 66 subjects. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30 days and 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change of Rutherford Classification (ITT Population) | Rutherford Classification; Class 0: Asymptomatic; no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease. Class 1: Mild Claudication; there is no limitation with ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking several blocks, climbing stairs). Limiting symptoms may occur with marked exertion (e.g., strenuous, rapid or prolonged exertion at work or recreation). Class 2: Moderate Claudication; there is a slight limitation of ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking uphill, or more than two level blocks, or climbing stairs rapidly). Subject is comfortable at rest. Class 3: Severe Claudication; there is marked limitation of ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking 1-2 level blocks or climbing one flight of stairs). Subject is comfortable at rest. Class 4: Ischemic rest pain. Class 5: Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia. Class 6: Major tissue loss extending above transmetatarsal level; functional foot no longer salvageable. | Analysis population includes all enrolled ITT (intent to treat) subjects who have been treated with the OAD regardless of deviations from the protocol. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, 30 days and 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change of Rutherford Classification (mITT Population) | Rutherford Classification; Class 0: Asymptomatic; no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease. Class 1: Mild Claudication; there is no limitation with ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking several blocks, climbing stairs). Limiting symptoms may occur with marked exertion (e.g., strenuous, rapid or prolonged exertion at work or recreation). Class 2: Moderate Claudication; there is a slight limitation of ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking uphill, or more than two level blocks, or climbing stairs rapidly). Subject is comfortable at rest. Class 3: Severe Claudication; there is marked limitation of ordinary physical activities (e.g., walking 1-2 level blocks or climbing one flight of stairs). Subject is comfortable at rest. Class 4: Ischemic rest pain. Class 5: Minor tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia. Class 6: Major tissue loss extending above transmetatarsal level; functional foot no longer salvageable. | The mITT analysis set included all enrolled subjects who have been treated with the OAD on a target lesion that has met Independent Physician Review, regardless of deviations from the protocol. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, 30 days and 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) | The Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) is a simple, non-invasive test used to assess peripheral artery disease (PAD). It compares the blood pressure measured at the ankle with the blood pressure measured at the arm (brachial artery). | The ITT population included all enrolled 67 subjects who have been treated with the OAD regardless of deviations from the protocol. The mITT population set included all enrolled subjects who have been treated with the OAD on a target lesion that has met Independent Physician Review, regardless of deviations from the protocol. Of 67 enrolled subjects, one could not confirm calcification due to insufficient imaging, resulting in mITT analysis population becoming 66 subjects. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ratio | Baseline (within 30 days of the clinical treatment), and Post Procedure (after the clinical trial treatment prior to discharge: post procedure ABI was collected on average 1.1 days post clinical trial treatment) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 67 |
| 27 |
| 67 |
| 49 |
| 67 |
| EG001 | Roll-in Cohort [Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System(OAS)] | Roll-in subjects were initial cases by the investigator enrolled to ensure proper device training, and procedural and data collection adherence. Roll-in subjects were consented, treated, and followed per protocol. Roll-in subject data was reported and analyzed separately from the Analysis Cohort. | 0 | 14 | 5 | 14 | 11 | 14 |
| Cancer | General disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac dysfunction - Chronic heart failure or aggravated | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| New/worsening claudication | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| New/worsening gangrene | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| New/worsening ulcer | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral artery abrupt closure | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral artery pseudoaneurysm | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral artery restenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral artery stenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral artery vasospasm | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Spinal cord/nerve root disorders | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other vascular disorder | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other infection- Localized | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Adverse event - Other | General disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Perforation | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Distal Emboli | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute onset limb ischemia | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dissection | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bleeding/hemorrhage, non access site | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral artery vasospasm | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral artery abrupt closure | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral artery stenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dissection | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Perforation | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Distal Emboli | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Allergic reaction | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea/vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral arteriovenous fistula | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (26.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| D002318 |
| Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases |
|
| Post POBA (ITT population) |
|
|
| Reduction in % Diameter Stenosis (Pre-procedure - Post OAD) (ITT population) |
|
|
| Reduction in % Diameter Stenosis (Pre-procedure - Post POBA) (ITT population) |
|
|
| Baseline (mITT population) |
|
|
| Post final OAD (mITT population) |
|
|
| Post POBA (mITT population) |
|
|
| Reduction in % Diameter Stenosis (Pre-procedure - Post OAD) (mITT population) |
|
|
| Reduction in % Diameter Stenosis (Pre-procedure - Post POBA) (mITT population) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Distal Emboli: FAS population |
|
|
| Dissection (D-F): mITT population |
|
|
| Perforation: mITT population |
|
|
| Distal Emboli: mITT population |
|
|
|
|
| 30 days (FAS population) : Clinically driven TLR |
|
|
| 6 months (FAS population) : All-cause death |
|
|
| 6 months (FAS population) : Major amputation of the target limb |
|
|
| 6 months (FAS population) : Clinically driven TLR |
|
|
| 30 days (mITT population) : All-cause death |
|
|
| 30 days (mITT population) : Major amputation of the target limb |
|
|
| 30 days (mITT population) : Clinically driven TLR |
|
|
| 6 months (mITT population) : All-cause death |
|
|
| 6 months (mITT population) : Major amputation of the target limb |
|
|
| 6 months (mITT population) : Clinically driven TLR |
|
|
| Grade III :Minor Tissue Loss (5) |
|
| Grade I:Severe Claudication (3) |
|
| Grade I:Moderate Claudication (2) |
|
| Grade I:Mild Claudication (1) |
|
| 30 Days |
|
|
| 6 Months |
|
|
| Grade I:Moderate Claudication (2) |
|
| Grade III :Minor Tissue Loss (5) |
|
| Grade I:Mild Claudication (1) |
|
| Grade I:Severe Claudication (3) |
|
| 30 Days |
|
|
| 6 Months |
|
|
|
| Change in mean ABI (post-procedure - baseline)(ITT population) |
|
|
| Baseline mean ABI (mITT population) |
|
|
| Post Procedure mean ABI (mITT population) |
|
|
| Change in mean ABI (post-procedure - baseline)(mITT population) |
|
|