Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development | OTHER |
| IQ Healthcare | UNKNOWN |
| Radboud Technology Ceter | UNKNOWN |
| Zorginstituut Nederland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rationale:
Efficacy study (RCT) for glycosaminoglycan(GAG)-therapy for the indication bladder pain syndrome / interstitial cystitis with Hunner lesion subtype (BPS-IC H+). reason for this study is a current lack of evidence regarding its efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Main objective is to determine short and long term efficacy of GAG therapy (bladder instillations) for people with BPS-IC H+ as compared to placebo treatment on dominant symptoms such as pain and Quality of Life (QOL)
Rationale:
Reimbursement in the Netherlands for GAG-therapy for bladder pain syndrome / interstitial cystitis patients with Hunner lesion subtype (BPS-IC H+) is under debate, as evidence regarding its efficacy and cost-effectiveness is lacking.
Objective:
Main objective is to determine short and long term efficacy of GAG therapy (bladder instillations) for people with BPS-IC H+ as compared to placebo treatment on dominant symptoms such as pain. Secondary objectives are to determine the 1) cost-effectiveness of GAG therapy, 2) effectiveness of GAG therapy on quality of life and bladder inflammation evaluated by urethrocystoscopy
Study design:
Multi-design study. Study is powered and set-up as double-blinded randomized intervention study and is extended with a double-blinded aggregated N-of-1 trial. As requested by the Zorginstituut Netherlands, the study will be further extended with a prospective, non-blinded intervention study to evaluate long term follow up with a low frequency therapy dose.
Study population:
People with symptomatic BPS-IC H+ (> 18 yrs old). A total of 80 patients will be included for the main study.
Intervention :
GAG bladder instillations (hyaluronic acid + chondroitin sulfate; Ialuril) 50ml administered with a catheter. Placebo will be Hypromellose 50ml administered with a catheter. Patients will receive instillations (Ialuril / placebo with ratio 2:1) in 3 periods of 6 wks with frequency of 1 instillation/wk. With wash-out periods 4 wks. After 3 periods of treatment / placebo (wk 30), blinding will cease and continue unblinded where all subjects will receive maintenance therapy Ialuril for 1x/4wk until 54 weeks (endpoint).
Main study parameters/endpoints:
Primary outcome parameter: change from baseline in maximum bladder pain (visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (3d average and maximal pain score).
Secondary outcome parameters:
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
Benefits patients and group relatedness. All participants are capacitated adults and will receive a similar amount of intervention and placebo treatments. Treatment corresponds to the Dutch NVU guideline BPS. Therapy will be reimbursed for patients. During 54wks, patients will have a 6 week period where placebo is given. Due to the study design, patients can obtain a personal (individual) study efficacy result if therapy was successful in him/her.
Therapy and placebo: risks and burden This study will be submitted as low-intervention trial. GAG therapy (instillations) has been used for >25 yrs in clinical practice to treat BPS-IC. GAG-therapies are registered as medical devices. The therapy is instilled into the bladder using a catheter (by nurse / patient). Catherization has a small increased risk for developing an urine tract infection (1.9%) [Herr 2015], urethral discomfort and in rare cases urethral trauma.
The placebo compound Hypromellose 0.3% is used as moisturizing drops to treat dry eyes. It is inert (non-irritating and hypo-allergenic). Very rare (< 0.01%) side effects are reported in the Dutch 'Farmacologisch Kompas'. They report local side effects of sensitivity (burning, itch, tears e.d.). Blurry vision. and very rare systemic effects as rash, itch.Because of these reported side effects at inclusion the (over)sensitivity is checked by one drop in an eye, taking into account the possible blurry vision afterwards.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo - Intervention - Intervention | Experimental | Treatment period 1: placebo for 1x/week for 6 weeks, followed by two treatment periods of 6 weeks receiving GAG-therapy (Ialuril) 1x/week. Finally this arm continues with unblinded GAG-therapy (Ialuril) instillations 1x/month for 6 instillations. |
|
| Intervention - Placebo - Intervention | Experimental | Treatment period 1: GAG-therapy (Ialuril) for 1x/week for 6 weeks, followed by treatment period 2: Placebo for 1x/week for 6 weeks and afterwards treatment period 3: GAG-therapy (Ialuril) for 1/x week for 6 weeks. Finally, this arm continues with unblinded GAG-therapy (Ialuril) instillations 1x/month for 6 instillations. |
|
| Intervention - Intervention - Placebo | Experimental | Treatment period 1: GAG-therapy (Ialuril) for 1x/week for 6 weeks, followed by treatment period 2: GAG-therapy (Ialuril) for 1x/week for 6 weeks and afterwards treatment period 3: placebo for 1/x week for 6 weeks. Finally, this arm continues with unblinded GAG-therapy (Ialuril) instillations 1x/month for 6 instillations. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IALURIL Prefill | Device | GAG therapy (bladder instillations with glycosaminoglycans) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in maximum bladder pain | VAS pain score (0-10; 0= no pain, 10=worst pain) | Fase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in average bladder pain | VAS pain score (0-10; 0= no pain, 10=worst pain) | Fase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54 |
| 7-point Global Response Assessment (GRA) scale |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D.A.W. Janssen, MD PhD | Contact | +31641856516 | dick.janssen@radboudumc.nl | |
| Charlotte van Ginkel, MD | Contact | charlotte.jvanginkel@radboudumc.nl |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radboud Unviversity Nijmegen Medical Centre | Recruiting | Nijmegen | Gelderland | 6500 | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40473282 | Derived | van Ginkel C, Groenewoud JMM, Hoogeboom TJ, Heesakkers J, Martens F, Janssen D. Carry-over effects in GAG therapy efficacy trial solution for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (GETSBI study): an interim analysis. BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 5;15(6):e092757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092757. | |
| 37045569 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
only anonymous patient data will be shared
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| UNKNOWN |
Study start as a normal double blinded RCT, but continues with an aggregated N-of-1 (multi-crossover) type trial
Not provided
Not provided
double blinded by care provider (person giving the treatment) and the participant (blinded syringes en placebo product)
The GRA is a 7-point descriptive scale, scores of 1-3 indicate worsening of symptoms, and 5-7 indicate and improvement in symptoms
| Fase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54 |
| Change in patient assessed most dominant symptom | VAS score (0-10; 0= no burden, 10=high burden) | Fase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54 |
| Voiding urgency | as single item from the validated Genito-Urinary Pain Index questionnaire (5 point Likert scale) | Fase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54 |
| Voiding frequency | as single item from the validated Genito-Urinary Pain Index questionnaire (5 point Likert scale) | Fase 1: Week 1,2,5,7,8,12,15,17,18,22,25,27,28,29 Fase 2:week 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 54 |
| O'leary Sant interstitial cystitis symptom index/problem index (ICSI/ICPI) | Validated BPS-IC related symptom questionaire | week 1, 6, 18, 28, 29, 40, 48 |
| Patient Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM) short and extended | Improvement (0-100%), continue treatment, reccommend to family, including Adverse Events and start/stop other treatment for BPS/IC | week 1, 8, 18, 28, 29, 40, 48 |
| Voiding diary | 2x24h | at baseline |
| Quality of Life questionnaire | Outcome of ED-5D 5L QoL questionnaire | week 1, 6, 18, 28, 29, 40, 48 |
| Urine sediment | Screening for bacterial urinary tract infection | week 1, 6, 18, 28, 29, 40, 48 |
| Cost effectiveness | iMCQ and iPCQ questionaires | week 1, 8, 18, 28 |
| Cystoscopic evaluation | Likert scale inflammation (1-5) | week 8 and week 28 |
| Rijnstate | Recruiting | Arnhem | 6815AD | Netherlands |
|
| Andros Clinics | Recruiting | Baarn | 3741GP | Netherlands |
|
| Slingeland | Not yet recruiting | Doetinchem | 7009 BL | Netherlands |
|
| Catharina ziekenhuis | Recruiting | Eindhoven | 5623 EJ | Netherlands |
|
| Alrijne ziekenhuis | Recruiting | Leiden | 2334 CK | Netherlands |
|
| MUMC+ | Recruiting | Maastricht | 6229HX | Netherlands |
|
| Isala klinieken | Recruiting | Zwolle | 8025 AB | Netherlands |
|
| van Ginkel C, Baars C, Heesakkers J, Martens F, Janssen D. Study protocol of a multicentre double-blind RCT, comparing a traditional RCT with an aggregated N-of-1 trial: GAG therapy Efficacy Trial Solution for Bladder pain syndrome/Interstitial cystitis (GETSBI study). BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 12;13(4):e068546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068546. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018856 | Cystitis, Interstitial |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003556 | Cystitis |
| D001745 | Urinary Bladder Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided