Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate both clinical measures and PROMs in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using restricted inverse kinematic alignment (iKA) compared to mechanical alignment (MA), both using surgical navigation assistance.
A prospective randomized clinical study will be conducted.
The study will consist of two cohorts and will collect clinical data from a maximum of 148 knee arthroplasty surgeries during which the patient will receive the Optetrak Logic® CR TKA device. Cohorts will consist of 1) subjects undergoing MA TKA and 2) subjects undergoing restricted iKA TKA. All cohorts will utilize navigation-assisted surgery (ExactechGPS®) and will be enrolled and consented concurrently. Subjects will be randomized and have a 50% chance of being assigned to the MA TKA cohort and a 50% chance of being assigned to the restricted iKA TKA cohort. Study and research staff will be blinded to randomization and the cohort allocation until after consenting and eligibility is determined. Subjects will be blinded to the randomization (MA TKA or restricted iKA TKA) until the completion of the study.
Data collection under this protocol shall be conducted in a way that conforms to any applicable local and national rules, regulations, and guidelines relating to the conduct of clinical research and the protection of human subjects. As appropriate, this may include but is not limited to the following: Good Clinical Practice (GCP) requirements, FDA regulations and guidelines, ISO 14155: 2020, ICH guidelines, HIPAA and other regulations pertaining to the protection of patient data and data privacy, guidelines established by local Institutional Review Boards or similar Ethics Committees, the Belmont Report, and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted Invers Kinematic Knee Alignment Technique | Other | Restricted Invers Kinematic Knee Alignment Technique |
|
| Mechanical Knee Alignment Technique | Other | Mechanical Knee Alignment Technique |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optetrak Logic CR Knee System | Device | The OPTETRAK® Comprehensive Knee System consists of the OPTETRAK® Total Knee System and the OPTETRAK Logic® Total Knee System. The OPTETRAK Comprehensive Knee System comprises both non-porous and porous knee prostheses for use in total-knee joint replacement procedures. (In the USA, the OPTETRAK Comprehensive Knee System is indicated for cemented use only, except for the OPTETRAK Logic PS and CR Porous Femoral Components, which are indicated for cemented or cementless use.) The system includes various sizes and types of modular femoral components, tibial components, patellar components, and accessories for use in primary and revision applications. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Knee Society Score (KSS) | Validated outcome score | 3-month |
| Knee Society Score (KSS) | Validated outcome score | 6-month |
| Knee Society Score (KSS) | Validated outcome score | 12-month |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | Validated outcome score | 3-month |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | Validated outcome score | 6-month |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | Validated outcome score | 12-month |
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | Validated outcome score | 3-month |
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | Validated outcome score | 6-month |
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | Validated outcome score |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Knee Alignment | Characterization of knee in terms of ligament balancing will be assessed through constant-pressure full arc of motion measurement. | Intraoperative |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be included in the study:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects will be excluded from the study if they meet any of the following exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Knisely, BSBA | Contact | 352-474-9582 | alex.knisely@exac.com | |
| Amanda Ford, PhD | Contact | amanda.ford@exac.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Mateu-Vincent, Medical Degree | Orthpaedic Surgeon Hospital Universitaria Mutua Terrassa | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fundacio Mutua de Terrassa per a la Docenia i Recera Biomedica i Social, F.P.C. | Recruiting | Barcelona | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32737528 | Background | Winnock de Grave P, Luyckx T, Claeys K, Tampere T, Kellens J, Muller J, Gunst P. Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Feb;30(2):488-499. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06165-4. Epub 2020 Jul 31. | |
| 28302462 |
Not provided
Not provided
There are no plans to share individual participant data
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomization list (block randomized, computer generated, two equal-size groups) will be created within the EDC system
Not provided
Not provided
Study and research staff will be blinded to randomization and the cohort allocation until after consenting and eligibility is determined. Subjects will be blinded to the randomization (MA TKA or restricted iKA TKA) until the completion of the study.
|
|
| 12-month |
| Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain | Visual scale from 1-10 (low score is better) | 3-month |
| Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain | Visual scale from 1-10 (low score is better) | 6-month |
| Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain | Visual scale from 1-10 (low score is better) | 12-month |
| Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Patient Satisfaction | Visual scale from 1-10 (high score is better) | 3-month |
| Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Patient Satisfaction | Visual scale from 1-10 (high score is better) | 6-month |
| Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Patient Satisfaction | Visual scale from 1-10 (high score is better) | 12-month |
| Almaawi AM, Hutt JRB, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA. The Impact of Mechanical and Restricted Kinematic Alignment on Knee Anatomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2133-2140. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.028. Epub 2017 Feb 20. |